Tax salience: an experimental investigation

Morone, Andrea and Nemore, Francesco (2015): Tax salience: an experimental investigation.

Abstract

A basic principle in public finance is tax incidence equivalence (well known as Liability Side Equivalence Principle, LES). This principle holds that the burden of a unit tax on buyers and sellers is independent of who actually pays the tax. Moreover, economic theory assumes an individual behaviour model in which subjects act as if they have to fully optimize changes in tax policies by correctly processing information in their possession. However, a wide empirical literature focused on some psychological issues that have as yet not been considered theoretically. It is easy to assume that the introduction of tax-inclusive prices and tax-exclusive prices could lead to price misperception. This means that individuals could not perceive the exact burden of a tax when it is not salient (as it could be in the case of tax-exclusive prices). We conduct a laboratory experiment that attempts to answer two relevant questions: (1) Do subjects’ behaviour change with a less salient tax? (2) Is tax incidence independent of the responsibility to pay a more or less salient tax? Based on the results of Mann-Whitney U tests, concerning the first question we conclude that, in accordance to the theory of tax incidence, subjects’ behaviour is not affected by salience. On the other hand, concerning the second question, contrary to theoretical predictions, we report evidence of stark differences in average trading prices for LSE principle analysis. Most notably, we observe that tax-on-seller treatment prices are systematically higher, thus revealing a plausible tax-shifting phenomenon.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Tax incidence; Tax salience; Liability Side Equivalence; choice behaviour; laboratory
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General

References

Ashenfelter, O. and D. Sullivan, (1987). “Nonparametric tests of market structure: An application to the cigarette industry” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4): 483-498.

Biswas, A., E. J. Wilson and J. W. Licata (1993). “Reference Pricing Studies in Marketing: A Synthesis of Research Results”, Journal of Business Research 27(3), 239–256.

Boylan, S. J. and P. J. Frischmann (2006). “Experimental Evidence on the Role of Tax Complexity in Investment Decisions”, Journal of the American Taxation Association 28, 69–88.

Chetty, R., A. Looney, K. Kroft (2009). “Salience and taxation: theory and evidence” The American Economic Review, 99(4): 1145-1177.

Cox, J. C., M. Rider, and A. Sen (2012). “Tax incidence: Do institutions matter? An experimental study”. Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series No 2012-17.

De Bartolome, C. A. de (1995). “Which tax rate do people use: Average or marginal?”, Journal of Public Economics 56, 79–96.

DellaVigna, S. (2007). “Psychology and Economics: evidence from the field” UC-Berkeley Working Paper.

Fishbacher, U. (2007). “z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments”, Experimetal Economics, 10(2), 171-178.

Fuji, E.T. and C.B. Hawley (1988). “On the accuracy of tax perceptions”, Review of Economics & Statistics, 70, 344-347.

Fullerton, D. and Metcalf, G. (2002). “Tax incidence.” Handbook of Public Economics, volume 4. A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., (Amsterdam: Elsevier): 1787-1872.

Gensemer, B.L., J.A. Lean and W.B. Neenan (1965). “Awareness of marginal income tax rates among high-income taxpayers”, National Tax Journal, 18, 258-267.

Gode, D.K. and S. Sunder (1997). “What makes markets allocationally efficient?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 2, May 1997.

Hanson, A. and R. Sullivan, (2009). “The incidence of tobacco taxation: evidence from geographic micro-level data” National Tax Journal, 62(4): 677-698.

Harris, J.E., (1987). “The 1983 increase in the federal cigarette excise tax” in Tax Policy and the Economy, 87-111. Lawrence H. Summers (ed.), MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Keeler, T.E., T. Hu, P.G. Barnett, W.G. Manning, H. Sung, (1996). “Do cigarette producers price-discriminate by state?” An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation”, Journal of Health Economics, 15(4): 499-512.

Kerschbamer, R. and G. Kirchsteiger (2000). “Theoretically robust but empirically invalid? An experimental investigation into tax equivalence”, Economic Theory, 16, 719-734.

Krishna, A., R. Briesch, D. Lehmann and H. Yuan (2002). “A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Price Presentation on Deal Evaluation”, Journal of Retailing 78(2), 101–118.

Levin, I. P., S. L. Schneider and G. J. Gaeth (1998). “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2), 149–188.

McCaffery, E.J. and J. Baron (2006). “Thinking about tax”, Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 12(1): 106-35.

Mill, J.S. (1848) “Principle of political economy. With some of their applications to social philosophy”, London.

Morgan, J.N., R.F. Dye and J.H. Hybels (1977). “Results from two national surveys of philanthropic activity” in: Commission on private philanthropy and public needs (ed.): research papers Volume I: History, trends and current magnitudes, 157-324.

Rosen, H. S. (1976). “Taxes in a labor supply model with joint wage-hours determination”, Econometrica 44, 485–507.

Ruffle, B.J. (2005). “Tax and subsidy incidence equivalence theories: experimental evidence from competitive markets. The experimental approaches to public economics”, Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1519-1542.

Rupert, T. J., L. E. Single and A. M. Wright (2003). “The Impact of Floors and Phase-Outs on Taxpayers' Decisions and Understanding of Marginal Tax Rates”, Journal of the American Taxation Association 25, 72–86.

Rupert, T.J. and C.M. Fischer (1995). “An empirical investigation of taxpayer awareness of marginal tax rates”, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 17, 36-59.

Sausgruber, R. and J.R. Tyran (2005). “Testing the Mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion”, Public Choice, 122, 39-68.

Simon, H. (1955). “A behavioral model of rational choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 691(1): 99-118.

Smirnov, N.V. (1936). “Estimate of deviation between empirical distribution functions in two independent samples (Russian),” Bulletin of Moscow State University 2: 3-16.

Smith, V. L. (1982). “Microeconomic system as an experimental science”, American Economic Review, 72, 923-955.

Smith, V.L. (1962). “An experimental study of competitive market behavior,” Journal of Political Economy 70, 111-37.