Can happiness provide new insights into social inequality? Evidence from Japan

Niimi, Yoko (2015): Can happiness provide new insights into social inequality? Evidence from Japan.

Abstract

This paper examines recent trends and determinants of happiness inequality in Japan using unique data from the “Preference Parameters Study of Osaka University” that was conducted annually in Japan during the 2003-2013 period. The data illustrate that, despite some fluctuations, Japan observed a fall in happiness inequality along with income growth during this period. By estimating Recentered Influence Function regressions, we find a negative and significant relationship between income level and happiness inequality, as found for other countries. The results also show that people’s perception of their relative standing in the income spectrum matters for the level as well as the dispersion of happiness. Other key determinants of happiness inequality include the insecurity of jobs, unemployment, the fear of becoming unemployed in the near future, having health concerns, feeling a sense of loneliness, and the expected coverage of living costs by public pensions after retirement, all of which have a positive effect on happiness inequality except that the public pension variable negatively affects the dispersion of happiness. Our empirical analysis illustrates that happiness inequality is a useful addition to the set of conventional inequality indicators to monitor and better understand social inequality and to formulate measures to tackle inequality-related issues.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Happiness; Inequality; Social Protection; Subjective Well-being
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Abul Naga, R. and T. Yalcin (2008), “Inequality Measurement for Ordered Response Health Data,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 27(6), pp. 1614-1625.

Allison, R. A. and J. E. Foster (2004), “Measuring Health Inequality using Qualitative Data,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 23(3), pp. 505-524.

Becchetti, L., R. Massari and P. Naticchioni (2014), “The Drivers of Happiness Inequality: Suggestions for Promoting Social Cohesion,” Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), pp. 419-442.

Beegle, K., K. Himelein and M. Ravallion (2012), “Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vo. 81(2), pp. 556-570.

Clark, A. E., S. Flèche and C. Senik (2014a), “Economic Growth Evens-Out Happiness: Evidence from Six Surveys,” CEP Discussion Papers, No. 136, London: Centre for Economic Performance.

Clark, A. E., S. Flèche and C. Senik (2014b), “The Great Happiness Moderation: Well-being Inequality during Episodes of Income Growth,” in Clark A. E. and C. Senik (eds), Happiness and Economic Growth: Lessons from Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clark, A. E., P. Frijters and M. Shields (2008), “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles,” Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), pp. 96-144.

Di Tella, R. and R. MacCulloch (2006), “Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economies,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20(1), pp. 25-46.

Dutta, I. and J. Foster (2013), “Inequality of Happiness in the U.S.: 1972-2010,” Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 59(3), pp. 393-415.

Easterlin, R. A. (1974), “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence,” in David, P. A. and M. W. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz. New York: Academic Press.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. and P. Frijters (2004), “How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness?” Economic Journal, Vol. 114(497), pp. 641-659.

Firpo, S. N. M. Fortin and T. Lemieux (2011), “Occupational Tasks and Changes in the Wage Structure,” IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5542, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Firpo, S. N. M. Fortin and T. Lemieux (2009), “Unconditional Quantile Regressions,” Econometrica, Vo. 77(3), pp. 953-973.

Firpo, S. N. M. Fortin and T. Lemieux (2007), “Decomposing Wage Distributions using Recentered Influence Function Regressions,” unpublished manuscript, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro and University of British Columbia.

Fleurbaey, M. (2009), “Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare,” Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), pp. 1029-1075.

Frey, B. S. and A. Stutzer (2002), “What Can Economists Lean from Happiness Research?” Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), pp. 402-435.

Frey, B. S. and A. Stutzer (2000), “Happiness, Economy and Institutions,” Economic Journal, Vol. 110(466), pp. 918-938.

Gandelman, N. and R. Porzecanski (2013), “Happiness Inequality: How Much is Reasonable?” Social Indicators Research, Vol. 110(1), pp. 257-269.

Gurr, T. R. (1994), “Peoples against States: Ethnopolitical Conflict and the Changing World System,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38(3), pp. 347-377.

Kalmijn, W. and R. Veenhoven (2005), “Measuring Inequality of Happiness in Nations,” Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 6(4), pp. 357-396.

Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin Books.

Madden, D. (2011), “The Impact of an Economic Boom on the Level of Distribution of Subjective Well-being: Ireland, 1994-2001,” Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 12(4), pp. 667-679.

Ohtake, F., M. Kohara, N. Okuyama and K. Yamada (2013), “Growing Inequalities and Their Impacts in Japan,” GINI Country Report – Japan, available online (http://gini-research.org/system/uploads/449/original/Japan.pdf?1370090592, accessed on April 10, 2015).

Ott, J. (2005), “Level and Inequality of Happiness in Nations: Does Greater Happiness of a Greater Number Imply Greater Happiness Inequality in Happiness?” Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 6(4), pp. 397-420.

Ovaska, T. and R. Takashima (2010), “Does a Rising Tide Life All the Boats? Explaining the National Inequality of Happiness,” Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 44(1), pp. 205-223.

Stevenson, B. and J. Wolfers (2008), “Happiness Inequality in the United States,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 37(S2), pp. S33-S79.

Stiglitz, J. E., A. Sen and J. Fitoussi (2009), Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, available online (http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm, accessed on January 27, 2015).

Tsutsui, Y, F. Ohtake and S. Ikeda (2009), “Naze Anataha Fukounanoka? (in Japanese) (Why are you unhappy?),” Osaka Daigaku Keizaigaku (Osaka Economic Papers), Vol. 58(4), pp. 20-57.

Tullock, G. (1971), “The Paradox of Revolution,” Public Choice, No. 11(1), pp. 89-99.

Van Praag, B. M. S. (2011), “Well-being Inequality and Reference Groups: An Agenda for New Research,” Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 9(1), pp. 111-127.

Van Praag, B. M. S. (1991), “Ordinal and Cardinal Utility: An Integration of the Two Dimensions of the Welfare Concept,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 50(1-2), pp. 69-89.

Veenhoven, R. (2005), “Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-Satisfaction across Time and Nations,” Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 6(4), pp. 457-487.

Yamane, C., S. Yamane and Y. Tsutsui (2008), “Koufukudo de Hakatta Chiikikan Kakusa (in Japanese) (Regional Disparities as Measured by Happiness),” Koudou Keizaigaku (Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance), Vol. 1(1), pp. 1-26.