Bouoiyour, Jamal and Selmi, Refk (2015): Greece withdraws from Euro and runs on Bitcoin; April Fools Prank or Serious Possibility?
Download (744kB) | Preview
This paper assesses whether the way in which the Greek crisis was communicated by media and social networking increase the debt deal uncertainty and the possibility of abandoning the euro in favor of Bitcoin. Through an improved frequency approach, we attempt to disentangle short-, medium- and long-run causality between Google Trends (search queries) and Twitter (social media) data related to the Greek crisis and Bitcoin unconditionally and conditioning upon relevant control variables. Our results unambiguously show a short-run unidirectional causality running from search queries and the number of tweets to the use of Bitcoin. These findings remain meaningful when a number of control variables are accounted for, while the cycle length becomes shorter. These results change substantially by the arrival of the left-wing Syriza party in power, on January 25th, 2015, with its radical approach to debt negotiations. The cycle becomes longer (short- and medium-run). Not surprisingly, doubts have increased as to whether Athens can appropriately settle its debt repayment obligations. This study indicates that Greece’s withdrawal from euro and running on Bitcoin is likely to be an April fool’s joke rather than serious possibility. It also proves a sharp distinguishability among Googlers and Twitters.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Greece withdraws from Euro and runs on Bitcoin; April Fools Prank or Serious Possibility?|
|Keywords:||Greek crisis; Social media; Google Trends; Bitcoin; frequency domain causality.|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E30 - General
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems
G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets
|Depositing User:||R. Selmi|
|Date Deposited:||28. Jun 2015 13:15|
|Last Modified:||28. Jun 2015 14:13|
Barber, S., X. Boyen, E. Shi and E. Uzun (2012), “Bitter to Better-How to Make BitCoin a Better Currency.” In A.D. Keromytis (ed.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 7397, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 399-414.
Bodart, V., et Candelon, B. (2009), “Evidence of interdependence and contagion using a frequency domain framework.” Emerging Markets Review, 10(2), pp. 140-150.
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., (2015), “What Does Bitcoin Look Like?” Annals of Economics and Finance 16, (Forthcoming).
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R. and Tiwari, A-K., (2015), “Is Bitcoin business income or speculative foolery? New ideas through an improved frequency domain analysis.” Annals of Financial Economics, 10(1), pp. 1-23. DOI: 10.1142/S2010495215500025
Bouoiyour,J., Selmi, R., Tiwari, A-K. and Shahbacz, M., (2015), “The Nexus between Oil price and Russia’s Real Exchange rate: Better Paths via Unconditional vs Conditional Analysis”, Energy Economics, In press.
Breitung, J., and Candelon, B., (2006), “Testing for short and long-run causality: a frequency domain approach.” Journal of Econometrics, 132, pp. 363-378.
Buchholz, M., Delaney, J., Warren, J., and Parker, J., (2012), “Bits and Bets, Information, Price Volatility, and Demand for Bitcoin.” Economics 312.
Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., and Kancs, A., (2014), “The Economics of Bitcoin Price Formation.” http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.4498.pdf
Dergides, T., Milas, C. and Pamagiotidis, T., (2013), “Tweets, Google Trends and Sovereign Spreads in the GIIPS.” GreeSE Paper No.78 Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe.
Geweke, J. (1982), “Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series.” Journal of American Statistical Association, 77, pp. 304-324.
Granger, C.W.J. (1969), “Investigation causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods.” Econometrica, 37, pp. 424-438.
Kristoufek, L., (2013), “Bitcoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era.” Scientific Reports 3 (3415), pp. 1-7.
Kristoufek, L., (2014), “What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis.” http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.0268.pdf
Lee, T.B. (2014), “These four charts suggest that Bitcoin will stabilize in the future.” Washington Post.
Lütkepohl, H. (2006), “Structural vector autoregressive analysis for cointegrated variables.” AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 90, pp. 75-88.
Moore, T. and Christin, N. (2013), “Beware the Middleman: Empirical Analysis of BitCoinExchange Risk.” Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 7859, pp. 25-33.
Mitchell, A., T. Rosenstiel and L. Christian (2012), “What Facebook and Twitter Mean for News.” Pew Research Center, Annual Report on American Journalism: The State ofthe News Media 2012.
Piskorec, M., Nino, A-F., Petra, N. , Igor, M. , Miha, G. , Irena, V. , and Tomislav, S., (2014), “News Cohesiveness: an Indicator of Systemic Risk in Financial Markets.” http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3483v1.pdf
Yermack, D., (2013), “Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal.” NBER Working Paper No. 19747. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19747
Van Wijk, D. (2013). “What can be expected from the BitCoin?” Working Paper No. 345986, Erasmus Rotterdam Universiteit.