Nizar, Muhammad Afdi (2010): PENENTUAN EFEK DAN ARAH KEBIJAKAN FISKAL PEMERINTAH INDONESIA: FISCAL IMPULSE MEASURE. Published in: Jurnal Keuangan dan Moneter , Vol. 13, No. 2 (2010): pp. 101-128.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65603.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The government overall budget (actual budget balance) is a one of indicators that could reveal the fiscal policies position responding to different economic situations. This indicator suggests that fiscal policy has been tightened or loosened, and in turn, reflects the impact of government policy to the economy is expansive or contractive. However, the analysis of this indicator is not include the impact of economic cycle nor other factors into consideration. Without inclusion of those factors, the analysis of overal budget would be biased and give mislead information about the impact and the direction of fiscal policy in certain period. Considering the above argument, this study is aimed to asses the impact and the fitness of fiscal policy direction in Indonesia during 2000-2009. The impact of fiscal policy to the economy (contractive, expansive, or neutral) would be assessed based on fiscal impulse measure, a methodolgy which already includes the impact of economic cycle in the analysis. The fitness of fiscal policy, countercyc-lical or procyclical to the economicy cycle, is determined by comparing the result of impulse measure with the economic cycle. This study has reached a several conlcusion: (1) expansive fiscal policy (loosen)—which is marked by increased of budget deficit—is not always give an expansionary impact to the economy. Similarly, contractive fiscal policy (tighten), also is not bring contration impact to the economy. (2) The government policies direction during this period, have been relatively in line to the economy cycle (procyclical) rather than a countercyclical. In other word, the government policy have been expansive during the economic boom period, and have been contractive during recesion. This study also concludes that there are three causes to this phenomenon, Firstly: the absence of automatic stabilizers, Secondly: the budget disbursement pattern was taken without considering the economic cycle, and thirdly: the existence of deviation between the budgeting process and the budget implementation. The study comes with recommendation that the government should reform the fiscal policy and implementation, by shifting from procyclical to the countercyclical policy. The government also should improve the effectiveness of tax and government expenditure instruments as an automatic stabilizers. This step would allow the effectiveness of fiscal policy in promoting economic stability.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | PENENTUAN EFEK DAN ARAH KEBIJAKAN FISKAL PEMERINTAH INDONESIA: FISCAL IMPULSE MEASURE |
English Title: | Fiscal Policy Stance in Indonesia : Fiscal Impluse Measure |
Language: | Indonesian |
Keywords: | contractionary fiscal policy, countercyclical fiscal policy, economic cycles, expansionary fiscal policy, fiscal impluse, output gap, procyclical fiscal policy |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget ; Budget Systems H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus |
Item ID: | 65603 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Muhammad Afdi Nizar |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2015 04:24 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 21:24 |
References: | Afonso, Antonio. Agnello, Luca. and Furceri, Davide. (2008). Fiscal Policy Responsiveness, Persistence, and Discretion. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. No. 659. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Afonso, A., and R. Sousa (2009, January). The Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Policy, ECB Working Paper 991. Aghion, Philippe. and Kharroubi, Enisse. (2007). Cyclical Macro Policy and Industry Growth: The Effect of Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policy. Washington: International Monetary Fund. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. Alberola, Enrique. et al. (2006). Debt Sustainability and Procyclical Fiscal Policies in Latin America. Economía, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Fall), pp. 157-193. Alesina. Alberto, Campante, Filipe. and Tabellini, Guido. (2008). Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical?. Journal of the European Economic Association 6(5): 1006-1036. Arena, Marco. and Revilla, Julio E.(December 2009). Pro-cyclical Fiscal Policy in Brazil: Evidence from the States. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5144. Washington DC: World Bank. Auerbach, A. and D. Feenberg (2000), The Significance of Federal Taxes as Automatic Stabilizers. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol.14, No.3, summer, pp.37–56. Baldacci, Emanuele. (2009, June). Neither Sailing Against the Wind, Nor Going With the Flow: Cyclicality Of Fiscal Policy In Indonesia. In Indonesia IMF Selected Issues. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. Basu, Susanto. and Fernald, John G. (2009, March). What do We Know and Not Know about Potential Output?. FRB Working Paper 2009-05. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Baunsgaard, Thomas. and Symansky, Steven A. (2009, September). Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers: How Can They Be Enhanced Without Increasing the Size of Government?, IMF Staff Position Note 09/23. Washington: International Monetary Fund. Ben Slimane. Sarra. and Ben Tahar, Moez. (2009). Why is fiscal policy procyclical in MENA countries?. Paper presented at Economic Research Forum 16 Annual Conference on “Shocks Vulnerability and Therapy”. November 2009. Cairo: Marriot Hotel. Bevilaqua, Afonso S. and Werneck Rogério L. F. (2007). Fiscal Impulse in the Brazilian Economy, 1989-1996. Texto Para Discussão No 379, Brazil: Departamento De Economia Puc – Rio. Blanchard, Olivier J. (1990, April). Suggestions for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators. OECD Working Papers No. 79. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Blejer, Mario I. and Cheasty, Andrienne. (ed. 1993). How to Measure the Fiscal Deficit: Analytical and Methodological Issues. Washington: International Monetary Fund. Bouthevillain, Carine. et al. (2001, September). Cyclically Adjusted Budget Balances: An Alternative Approach. European Central Bank Working Paper No. 77. Germany: European Central Bank. Bouthevillain, Carine. et al. (2009, July). Pros and Cons of Various Fiscal Measures to Stimulate the Economy. Economic Bulletin. Spain: Banco de España. Braconier, Henrik, and Holden, Steinar. (1999). The Public Budget Balance—Fiscal Indicators and Cyclical Sensitivity in Nordic Countries. NIER Working Paper, No. 67. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute of Economic Research. Braun, Miguel. (2001, March). Why is Fiscal Policy Procyclical in Developing Countries?. Mimeo, Harvard University,. Budnevich L., Carlos. (2002, April). Countercyclical Fiscal Policy: A Review of the Literature, Empirical Evidence and Some Policy Proposals. UNU/WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2002/41. Helsinki, Finland: UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research. Capet, Stéphane. (2004, September). The Efficiency of Fiscal Policies: A Survey of the Literature. CEPII, Working Paper No. 2004 – 11. Carmignani, Fabrizio. (2010), Cyclical Fiscal Policy in Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling xxx (2010) xxx–xxx.Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Chakraborty, Pinaki and Chakraborty, Lekha S. (2006). Is Fiscal Policy Contracyclical in India: An Empirical Analysis. Munich Personal RePec Archiv (MRPA) Paper No.7604. Munchen. http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/7604/MPRA Paper No. 7604 Chalk, Nigel A. (2002, June). Structural Balances and All That: Which Indicators to Use in Assessing Fiscal Policy. IMF Working Paper 02/101. Washington: International Monetary Fund. Chand, Sheetal K. (1992, May). Fiscal Impulses and their Fiscal Impact. IMF Working Paper 92/38. Washington: International Monetary Fund. Chand, Sheetal K. (1993). Fiscal Impulse Measures and their Fiscal Impact. in Mario I. Blejer and Andrienne Cheasty. (eds). How to Measure the Fiscal Deficit: Analytical and Methodological Issues. Washington: IMF. Chouraqui, Jean Claude., Hagemann, Robert P., and Sartor, Nicola. (1990, April). Indicators of Fiscal Policy: A Re-examination. OECD Working Papers, No. 78. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Clark, Tom. and Dilnot, Andrew. (2002). Measuring the UK Fiscal Stance since the Second World War. Briefing Note No. 26, UK: The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Decymus dan Permatasari, Diana. (2003, Desember). Indikator Fiscal Impulse untuk Pengukuran Stance Kebijakan Fiskal. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, Volume 6, Nomor 3. hal. 13-22, Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65603 |
Available Versions of this Item
- PENENTUAN EFEK DAN ARAH KEBIJAKAN FISKAL PEMERINTAH INDONESIA: FISCAL IMPULSE MEASURE. (deposited 21 Jul 2015 04:24) [Currently Displayed]