Dynamic of Publication Network in German Photovoltaic Industry

Vasaf, Esmaeil and Sanatkhani, Mahboobeh (2014): Dynamic of Publication Network in German Photovoltaic Industry.

Abstract

Besides high policy-induced motivations for development of research activities in photovoltaic industry, there have been a few social network studies concentrating on the scientific publication in this field. This study tried to shed light on the structure and evolution of publication network in German PV industry from 1988 to 2013. For this purpose, using the centrality indices, We realized the most influential actors as potential source of knowledge and actors who play the central role in knowledge production and diffusion. In next step, we investigated the dynamic of co-authorship network of scientists. Results showed that against the downward trend of network’s cohesion, overall compared to the same size random generated network, German PV co-authorship network is characterized as a small world network which emphasizes the efficient diffusion of knowledge compare to other type of network. Finally, to disclose the drivers behind the evolution of co-authorship network, we hypothesized two different scenarios. First, using descriptive analysis, the existence of preferential attachment mechanism is investigated. Fitting power law distribution over degree of nodes rejected our hypothesis for all investigating time windows. Therefore, preferential attachment mechanism cannot significantly explain the evolution of the network and reveals that network is robust in response to removal of large nodes. Second, looking at the composition of knowledge on map of science provided strong evidence in support of interdisciplinarity nature of German PV industry. Our descriptive analysis shows that along with existence of leading macro-disciplines such as Materials Science and Physics Applied, new subject categories of science have found a significant position over the existing knowledge domain during the observed period.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: publication network, PV industry, knowledge diffusion, preferential attachment
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General

References

Abbasi, A., L. Hossain and L. Leydesdorff (2012). "Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks." Journal of Informetrics6(3): 403-412.

Andrade., M. T. T., P. Braga., T. K. G. Carneiro., N. M. Ribeiro., M. A. Moret. and H. B. d. B. Pereira. (2014). "Contextualized Analysis of Social Networks: Collaboration in Scientific Communities." Social Networking03(02): 71-79.

Barabasi, A. L., H. Jeong, Z. Nda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert and T. Vicsek (2002). "Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations." Physica A311: 590–614.

Batagelj, V. and A. Mrvar (2004). Pajek—analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph drawing software, Springer: 77-103.

Bellanca, L. (2009). "Measuring interdisciplinary research: analysis of co-authorship for research staff at the University of York." Biocsience Horizons2(2).

Bojanowski, M. (2013). "intergraph: Coercion routines for network data objects in R."

Boyack, K. W. (2004). "Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences101(suppl 1): 5192-5199.

Butts, C. (2008). "network: A Package for Managing Relational Data in R." Journal of Statistical Software24(2).

Clauset, A., C. R. Shalizi and M. E. J. Newman (2009). "Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data." Siam Review51(4): 661-703.

Cowan, R. and N. Jonard (2004). "Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control28(8): 1557-1575.

Csardi, G. and T. Nepusz (2006). "The igraph software package for complex network research." InterJournal Complex Systems1695: 1695.

Erfanmanesh., M., V. A. Rohani. and A. Abrizah. (2012). "Coauthorship Network of Scientometrics Research Collaboration." Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,17(3): 73-93.

Fleming, L., C. King and A. I. Juda (2007). "Small Worlds and Regional Innovation." Organization Science18(6): 938-954.

Gillespie, C. S. (2014). "Fitting heavy tailed distributions: the poweRlaw package." arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3492.

González-Alcaide, G., R. Aleixandre-Benavent, C. Navarro-Molina and J. C. Valderrama-Zurián (2008). "Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology." Fertility and Sterility90(4): 941-956.

Graf, H. (2011). "Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators." Cambridge Journal of Economics35(1): 173-198.

Guo, Y., A. L. Porter and L. Huang (2009). Nanotechnology enhanced thin-film solar cells: analysis of global research activities with future prospects. Proceedings of 18th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology, Orlando, FL.

Kas, M., K. M. Carley and L. R. Carley (2012). "Trends in science networks: understanding structures and statistics of scientific networks." Social network analysis and mining2(2): 169-187.

Katz., J. S. and B. R. Martin (1997). "What is research collaboration?" Research Policy26: 1-18.

Krafft, J., F. Quatraro and P. P. Saviotti (2011). "The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis." Economics of Innovation and New Technology20(5): 445-475.

Leydesdorff, L. and C. S. Wagner (2008). "International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group." Journal of Informetrics2(4): 317-325.

Melin, G. and O. Persson (1996). "Studying research collaboration using co-authorships." Scientometrics36(3): 363-377.

Newman, M. E. J. (2001). "Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality." Physical Review E64(1).

Newman, M. E. J. (2001). "Scientific collaboration networks.I. Network construction and fundamental results." Physical Review E64(1).

Persson, O., R. Danell and J. W. Schneider (2009). "How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis." Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday: 9-24.

Porter, A. L., J. D. Roessner, A. S. Cohen and M. Perreault (2006). "Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture." Research Evaluation15(3): 187-195.

Porter, A. L., J. Youtie, P. Shapira and D. J. Schoeneck (2007). "Refining search terms for nanotechnology." Journal of Nanoparticle Research10(5): 715-728.

Rafols, I., A. L. Porter and L. Leydesdorff (2010). "Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(9): 1871-1887.

Verspagen, B. and C. Werker (2004). "Keith Pavitt and the Invisible College of the Economics of Technology and Innovation." Research Policy33(9): 1419-1431.

Wagner, C. S. and L. Leydesdorff (2005). "Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science." Research Policy34(10): 1608-1618.

Wagner, C. S., J. D. Roessner, K. Bobb, J. T. Klein, K. W. Boyack, J. Keyton, I. Rafols and K. Börner (2011). "Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature." Journal of Informetrics5(1): 14-26.

Wulf, T., P. Missner and F. F. v. Bernewitz (2010). "Future Scenarios for the German Photovoltaic Industry." HHL Working Paper99.

www.irena.org/Publications (2013). "Solar Photovoltaics- Technology Brief." IEA-ETSAP and IRENA- Technology Brief E11.

Ying, G., H. Lu and A. L. Porter (2009). Profiling research patterns for a New and Emerging Science and Technology: Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Science and Innovation Policy, 2009 Atlanta Conference.