Makovi, Michael (2015): Do Economic Models Have to be Realistic?: A Methodological Criticism of Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65790.pdf Download (131kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality, Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1754) sketches a hypothetical illegitimate social contract to explain the origin of socioeconomic inequality. Rousseau himself notes that his illegitimate social contract is not intended to be historically accurate. But this casts doubt on the methodological validity of his argument. According to Ronald Coase's (1981) criticism of Milton Friedman (1953) statements on the methodology of positive economics, theoretical models, to be valid, must possess a certain degree of realism which Rousseau's does not. This same criticism applies to Carole Pateman's adaptation of Rousseau in her Sexual Contract (1988).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Do Economic Models Have to be Realistic?: A Methodological Criticism of Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality |
English Title: | Do Economic Models Have to be Realistic?: A Methodological Criticism of Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Rousseau, Coase, Pateman, Sexual Contract, methodology, inequality |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty |
Item ID: | 65790 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Michael Makovi |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2015 20:26 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:34 |
References: | Coase, Ronald. H. 1981. “How Should Economists Choose?,” in: No editor listed. Ideas, Their Origins, and Their Consequences: Lectures to Commemorate the Life and Work of G. Warren Nutter. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute: 57-79. D'Agostino, Fred, Gaus, Gerald and Thrasher, John. 2014. “Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract,” in: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition). <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/> Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in: Milton Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 3-43. Hague, Rod and Martin Harrop. 2007. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 7th edition. Basingstroke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. Many editions. Locke, John. 1689. Second Treatise of Government. Many editions. Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Mills, Charles W. 2007. “The Domination Contract,” in: Carole Pateman and Charles W. Mills. Contract and Domination. Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA: Polity Press: 79-105. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. NY: Basic Books. Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap (Harvard University Press). Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1754. Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality, in: Wootton 2008: 371-426. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. On the Social Contract, in: Wootton 2008: 427-487. Wootton, David (ed.). 2008. Modern Political Thought: Readings from Machiavelli to Nietzsche. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65790 |