Social assistance benefits and European coordination

Wang, Jinxian and Van Vliet, Olaf and Goudswaard, Kees (2015): Social assistance benefits and European coordination.

Abstract

A number of studies suggest that the Europeanization process has a profound impact on national labour market policies, but fairly little research has been devoted to the development of social assistance benefit schemes across countries and over time. Relying on two new indicators, benefit levels and replacement rates, we examine the impact of the Lisbon Strategy on national social assistance policies. We find no robust effects for the first years of the Lisbon Strategy. However, after its re-launch in 2005, the Lisbon Strategy has significantly contributed to increases of national social assistance benefit levels. In addition to the Lisbon Strategy, domestic political, institutional and several economic factors also have a significant impact on social assistance benefits.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: social assistance benefit replacement rates, open method of coordination, Lisbon Strategy, Europeanization, welfare state reform
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Adema, W. (2006), ‘Social Assistance Policy Development and the Provision of a Decent Level of Income in Selected OECD Countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers no. 38.

Allan, J. P. and L. Scruggs (2004), ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies’, American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496-512.

Amable, B., D. Gatti and J. Schumacher (2006), ‘Welfare State Retrenchment: the Partisan Effect Revisited’, Oxford Review of Economics Policy 22(3): 426-444.

Anderson, K. M. (2001), ‘The Politics of Retrenchment in a Social Democratic Welfare State: Reform of Swedish Pensions and Unemployment Insurance’, Comparative Political Studies 34(9): 1063-1091.

Armingeon, K. (2007), ‘Active Labour Market Policy, International Organizations and Domestic Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(6): 905-932.

Armingeon, K., D. Weisstanner, S. Engler, P. Potolidis and M. Gerber (2012), Comparative Political Data Set III. Berne: University of Berne.

Barcevičius, E. (2014), ‘Is the Social OMC Fit for Purpose? Adequacy and Institutional Design, 2006-2010’, in E. Barcevičius, J. T. Weishaupt and J. Zeitlin (eds), Assessing the Open Method of Coordination: Institutional Design and National Influence of EU Social Policy Coordination. Palgrave Macmillan: 40-86.

Beck, N. and J. N. Katz (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, The American Political Science Review 89(3): 634-647.

Beck, N. and J. N. Katz (2011), ‘Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data’, Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331-352.

Beck, T., G. Clarke, A. Groff, P. Keefer and P. Walsh (2001): ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165-176.

Bekker, S. and S. Klosse (2013), ‘EU Governance of Economic and Social Policies: Chances and Challenges for Social Europe’, European Journal of Social Law 2: 103-120.

Borrás, S. and C. M. Radaelli (2011), ‘The Politics of Governance Architectures: Creation, Change and Effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(4): 463-484.

Borrás, S. (2009), ‘The Politics of the Lisbon Strategy: The Changing Role of the Commission’, West European Politics 32(1): 97-118.

Büchs, M. and K. Hinrichs (2007), ‘Germany: Moving towards Europe but Putting National Autonomy First’, in J. Kvist and J. Saari (eds), The Europeanisation of Social Protection. Bristol: The Policy Press: 21-40.

Caminada, K., Goudswaard, K.P. and Van Vliet, O. (2010) ‘Patterns of Welfare State Indicators in the EU: Is There Convergence?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 48(3): 529–56.

Clegg, D. (2014), ‘Convergence from below? The reform of minimum income protection in France and the UK’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 30(2): 147-164.

Commission of the European Communities (2005), Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2005) 330 final, 20 July 2005, Brussels.

Cusack, T., T. Iversen and P. Rehm (2006), ‘Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3): 365-389.

Daly, M. (2006), ‘EU Social Policy after Lisbon’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 461-481.

Danforth, B. and J.D. Stephens (2013), ‘Measuring social citizenship: achievements and future challenges’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(9): 1285-1298.

De Boef, S. and Keele, L. (2008) ‘Taking Time Seriously’. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184–200.

De la Porte, C. and P. Pochet (2002b), ‘Supple Co-ordination at EU Level and the Key Actors’ Involvement’, in C. de la Porte and P. Pochet (eds), Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co-ordination. Brussels: P.I.E. – Peter Lang, 27-69.

European Council (1992), Council Recommendation on Common Criteria Concerning Sufficient Resources and Social Assistance in Social Protection Systems (92/441/CEE): 246-248.

European Council (2000a), Fight against Poverty and Social Exclusion – Definition of Appropriate Objectives. Document submitted to the European Council in Nice by the Employment and Social Affairs Council, Document No. 14110/00, 30 November 2000.

European Council (2000b), Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000.

European Council (2005), Working Together for Growth and Jobs. A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy. Communication to the Spring European Council of 2 February 2005.

European Commission (2010a), Lisbon Strategy Evaluation Document. Commission Staff Working Document, SEC (2010) 114 final, 2 February 2010, Brussels.

European Commission (2010b), Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, 3 March 2010, Brussels.

European Commission (2014), Exchange Rates Database, Brussels.

Ferrera, M. and M. Matsaganis (2002), ‘Open Coordination against Poverty: the New EU ‘Social Inclusion Process’’, Journal of European Social Policy 12(3): 227-240.

Ferrera, M. and S. Sacchi (2005), ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination and National Institutional Capabilities: The Italian Experience’, in J. Zeitlin, P. Pochet (eds) with L. Magnusson, The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment Strategy and Social Inclusion Strategies. Brussels: P.I.E. – Peter Lang, 137-172.

Garrett, G. and D. Mitchell (2001), ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’, European Journal of Political Research 39(2): 145-177.

Graziano, P.R. and M. Jessoula (2011), ‘’Eppur si muoveva…’ The Italian Trajectory of Recent Welfare Reforms: From ‘Rescued by Europe’ to Euro-scepticism’, in P.R. Graziano, S. Jacquot and B. Palier (eds.), The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 148-174.

Guillén, A. (2007), ‘Spain: Starting from Periphery, Becoming Centre’, in J. Kvist and J. Saari (eds), The Europeanisation of Social Protection. Bristol: The Policy Press: 117-135.

Hamel, M.P. and B. Vanhercke (2009), ‘The Open Method of Coordination and Domestic Social Policy Making in Belgium and France: Window Dressing, One-way Impact, or Reciprocal Influence’, in M. Heidenreich and J. Zeitlin (eds), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge: 84-111.

Hays, J. C., S. D. Ehrlich and C. Peinhardt (2005), ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: Am Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’, International Organization 59(2): 473-494.

Heidenreich, M. and G. Bischoff (2008), ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination: A Way to the Europeanisation of Social and Employment Policies’, Journal of Commen Market Studies 46(3): 497-532.

Hemerijck, A. and J. Visser (2003), Policy Learning in European Welfare States. Unpublished paper, Leiden University and University of Amsterdam.

Heston, A., R. Summers and B. Aten. (2012), Penn World Table Version 7.1. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.

Hicks, A. and D. H. Swank (1992), ‘Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-82’, American Political Science Review 86(3): 658-674.

Immervoll, H., S. P. Jenkins and S. Königs (2015), ‘Are Recipients of Social Assistance ‘Benefit Dependent’? Concepts, Measurement and Results for Selected Countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 162.

Iversen, T. and T. R. Cusack (2000), ‘The Cause of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?’, World Politics 52(3): 313-349.

Jacobsson, K. and H. Johansson (2009), ‘The Micro-politics of the Open Method of Coordination: NGOs and the Social Inclusion Process in Sweden’, in M. Heidenreich and J. Zeitlin (eds), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge: 173-191.

Jessoula, M., J. Kubisa, I. Madama, and M. Zielenska (2014), ‘Understanding Convergence and Divergence: Old and New Cleavages in the Politics of Minimum Income Schemes in Italy and Poland’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 30(2): 128-146.

Korpi, W. and J. Palme (2003), ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975-95’, The American Political Science Review 97(3), 425-446.

Leibfried, S. (2000), ‘National Welfare States, European Integration and Globalisation: A Perspective for the Next Century’, Social Policy and Administration 34(1): 44-63.

Martin, C. J. and D. Swank (2004), ‘Does the Organization of Capital Matter? Employers and Active Labor Market Policy at the National and Firm Levels’, The American Political Science Review 98(4): 593-611.

Marchal, S., I. Marx and N. van Mechelen (2014), ‘The Great Wake-Up Call? Social Citizenship and Minimum Income Provisions in Europe in Times of Crisis’, Journal of Social Policy 43(2): 247-267.

Marx, I. and K. Nelson (2012), Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nelson, K. (2008), ‘Minimum Income Protection and European Integration: Trends and Levels of Minimum Benefits in Comparative Perspective, 1990-2005’, International Journal of Health Services 38(1): 103-124.

Nelson, K. (2010), ‘Social Assistance and Minimum Income Benefits in Old and New EU Democracies’, International Journal of Social Welfare 19: 367-378.

Nelson, K. (2013), ‘Social Assistance and EU Poverty Thresholds 1990-2008. Are European Welfare Systems Providing Just and Fair Protection Against Low Income?’, European Sociological Review 29(2): 386-401. OECD (2015), Labour Statistics. Paris: OECD.

Olaskoaga, J., R. Alaez-Aller and P. Diaz-De-Basurto-Uraga (2013), ‘Beyond Welfare Effort in the Measuring of Welfare States’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(3): 274-287.

Paetzold, J. and O. van Vliet (2014), ‘EU Coordination and the Convergence of Domestic Unemployment Protection Schemes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1070-1089.

Preunkert, J. and S. Zirra (2009), ‘Europeanization of Domestic Employment and Welfare Regimes: The German, French, and Italian Experiences’, in M. Heidenreich and J. Zeitlin (eds), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge: 192-213.

Radaelli, C. M. (2002), ‘The Domestic Impact of European Union Public Policy: Notes on Concepts, Methods and the Challenges of Empirical Research’, Political Européenne 1(5): 105-136.

Rodrik, D. (1998), ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments’, Journal of Political Economy 106(5): 997-1002.

Saarela, J. (2004), ‘How Unemployment Duration Affects Social Assistance Receipt: Evidence from Finland’, International Journal of Social Welfare 13(3): 223-232.

Saari, J. and J. Kvist (2007), ‘European Union Developments and National Social Protection’, in J. Kvist and J. Saari (eds), The Europeanisation of Social Protection. Bristol: The Policy Press: 1-20.

Smeeding, T. (2006), ‘Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Economics Perspectives 20(1): 69-90.

Starke, P. (2006), ‘The Politics of Welfare State Retrenchment: A literature Review’, Social Policy & Administration 40(1): 104-120.

Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Mechelen, N. and S. Marchal (2013), ‘Struggle for Life: Social Assistance Benefits, 1992 – 2009’, in: I. Marx and K. Nelson, Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 28-53.

Van Vliet, O., and K. Caminada (2012), ‘Unemployment Replacement Rates Dataset among 34 Welfare States 1971-2009: An Update, Extension and Modification of Scruggs’ Welfare State Entitlements Data Set’, NEUJOBS Special Report no. 2.

Van Vliet, O. and F. Koster (2011), ‘Europeanisation and the Political Economy of Active Labour Market Policies’, European Union Politics 12(2): 217-239.

Van Vliet, O. and C. Wang (2015), ‘Social Investment and Poverty Reduction: A Comparative Analysis across 15 European Countries’, Journal of Social Policy 44(3): 611-638.

Vink, M. (2003), ‘What Is Europeanisation? And Other Questions on a New Research Agenda’, European Political Science 3(1): 63-74.

Wang, J. and O. van Vliet (2014), ‘Social Assistance and Minimum Income Benefits: Benefit Levels, Replacement Rates and Policies across 33 Countries’, Department of Economics Research Memorandum 2014.04. Leiden: Leiden University.

Whiteford, P. (1995), ‘The Use of Replacement Rates in International Comparisons of Benefit Systems’, International Social Security Review 48(2): 3-30.

World Bank (2012), World Development Indicators. Washington.

Zeitlin, J. (2009), ‘The Open Method of Coordination and Reform of National Social and Employment Policies: Influences, Mechanisms, Effects’, in M. Heidenreich and J. Zeitlin (eds), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge: 214-245.

Zeitlin, J. and Vanhercke, B. (2014), ‘Socializing the European Semester? Economic Governance and Social Policy Coordination in Europe 2020’, SIEPS 2014(7), Stockholm.