Shared ecological knowledge and wetland values: a case study

Franco, Daniele and Luiselli, Luca (2014): Shared ecological knowledge and wetland values: a case study. Published in: Land Use Policy No. 41 (2014): pp. 526-532.

Abstract

The estimation of wetlands’ non-use values to build up a total economic evaluation can be based on stated preference methods, which derives from the standard economic model that assumes a rational assessment of the consequence of preferences on personal utility. The paper describes the citizens’ shared ecological knowledge (SEK) of wetlands functions. It descibes SEK nature, SEK relation with the official knowledge, the relation between the motivations outlined by SEK and those expected by the standard economic model. The results demonstrate that economic preferences are driven by multiple motivations well rooted in the SEK’s social nature, and not by simply consequential motivations. In this case study, social knowledge of wetlands' ecological functions is proportionally related to people's living proximity to those wetlands. Unexpectedly, SEK of historically well-known and critically important services like hydraulic and hydrologic services has also been diminishing. Furthermore, there is a partial or clear-cut separation between official knowledge and SEK on crucial aspects like wetlands’ climate change role. This approach helps to construct a motivational framework to derive values that are useful as long as they allow accounting for a complex socio-cultural capital in the public decision making process.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Wetlands; ecosystem services; ecological functions; public goods; multiple motivation analyses; environmental awareness; perceived utility
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Adams J. 1993. The emperor’s old clothes: the curious comeback of cost benefit analysis. Environmental Values 2(3): 247-260.

Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.

Alberini A., Rosato P., Longo A., Zanatta V. 2005. Information and willingness to pay in a contingent valuation study: the value of S. Erasmo in the Lagoon of Venice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 48: 155–175.

Asciuto A, Fiandaca F, Schimmenti E. 2005. Formati di domanda nella valutazione contingente. Estimo e Territorio 2: 9-21.

Balram S, Dragićević S. 2005. Attitudes toward urban green spaces : integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS technique to improve attitude measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning 71: 147-162.

Bateman, I.J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D.N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., De Nocker, L., Ščeponavičiūté, R., and Seméniené, D. 2009. Making benefit transfers work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 09-10. Online URL http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/edm_2009_10.pdf

Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B.H., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroğlu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R. and Swanson, J. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C., 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10:1251–1262

Bernard, H.R. 1996. Structured and semi-structured interview. In: Research Methods in Anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Boyer T, Polasky S. 2004. Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24:744-755.

Brander, L.M., Florax, J.G.M. & Vermaat, J.E. 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(2): 223-250.

Burnham KP, Anderson D.R. 2002. Model selection and multi model inference. Springer, New York. 236 pp.

Castello, L., J. P., Viana, G. Watkins, M. Pinedo-Vasquez, Luzadis V. A.. 2009. Lessons from integrating fishers of Arapaima in small-scale fisheries management at the Mamirauá Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management. 43(2):197-209.

Costanza R., d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.

Davidson-Hunt I., Berkes F. 2003. Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation Ecology 8(1): 5. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol8/iss1/art5

Farley J., 2012. Ecosystem services: The economics debate. Ecosystem Services. 1: 40–49. available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002 Diamond J, 2005. Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail Or Succeed. Viking, USA.

Franco D, Mannino I, Favero L, Mattiuzzo E., 2007. The Total Economic Value of the wetlands in a European Region. Proceedings of Multifunctions of wetland systems Congress "International Conference on Multiple Roles of Wetlands". Legnaro (Padova) 26 - 29 June 2007.

Franco D., Luiselli L. 2011. Cosa c’è dietro la volontà a pagare per i beni comuni? Un caso studio nella provincia di Roma. Territori. 3: 22-35.

Franco D., Luiselli L., 2013. A procedure to analyse the strategic outliers and the multiple motivations in a contingent valuation: a case study for a concrete policy purpose. International Journal of Social Economics, 3:246-266.

Gómez-Baggethun E., Reyes-García V., Olsson P., Montes C., 2012. Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: a case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change. 22 (3): 640-650.

Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA. 2003. Landscape planning and stress, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2: 1-18.

Hanemann WM, Kanninen B, 1999. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In: Bateman I. and Willis K. (Eds). Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 302-441.

Horstman M.; Wightman G., 2001. Karparti ecology: Recognition of Aboriginal ecological knowledge and its application to management in north-western Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration. 2 (2): 99-109.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York.

IFEN 2000. La Sensibilité Ecologique des Française à Travers l'Opinion Publique. Institut National de l'Environnement.

INFC - Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio (2005) Corpo Forestale dello Stato – Ispettorato Generale

Kadlec RH, Knight RL. 1996. Treatment Wetlands: Theory and Implementation. Lewish Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. Kaplan S, Kaplan R. 1982. Cognition and environment: functioning in a uncertain world. Praeger Publisher, New York.

Leschine TM, Wellman KF, Green TH. 1997. The Economic Value of Wetlands: Wetlands’ Role in Flood Protection in Western Washington. Washington Department of Ecology. Publication No. 97-100.

Lindhjema E., Navrudb S. 2011. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? Ecological Economics. 70 (9): 1628–1637.

Luginbüil Y. 2001. Paysage modèles et modèle de paysage. In: CREDOC, Ministère de l'Environnement: l'Eenvironnement, Question Sociale. Edition Odile Jacob, Paris, pp. 49-56.

Luiselli L. 2006. Ecological modelling of convergence patterns between European and African ‘whip’ snakes. Acta Oecologica 30: 62-68.

MacDonald DH, Weber M., 1998. Using Participatory Research Methods in Economic Research. Rural Economy Staff Paper 98 -11. Department of Rural Economy, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Home Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. on line (18.10.2012) at: http://www.rees.ualberta.ca/Research/~/media/rees/Research/Documents/Staff%20Papers/sp-98-11.pdf.

Mannino I., Franco D., Piccioni E., Favero L., Mattiuzzo E., Zanetto G. 2008. A cost-effectiveness analysis of semi-natural wetlands and activated sludge wastewater treatment systems. Environmental Management. 41:118-119.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington: Island Press.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

Moser D, Dunning M 1986. A Guide For Using the Contingent Valuation Methodology in Recreation Studies, National Economic Development Procedures Manual-Recreation, Vol. 2. IWR Report 86-R-5, U.S. Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Army Corps of Engineers.

Mullarkey DJ, Bishop RC. 1999. Sensitivity to scope: evidence from a CVM study of wetlands. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 1313. Norman H. N. 1999. SPSS for Windows, Release 10.0. SPSS, New York, NY

Orcherton, D. 2012. Raising the bar: Recognizing the intricacies of cultural ecological knowledge in natural resource management. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 12(3): 55–82. http://jem.forrex.org/index.php/jem/article/view/48/102

Pagiola S., von Ritter K., Bishop J. 2004. Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Env. Dep. Paper n. 101. Washington D.C.

Palomo, I., B. Martín-López, C. López-Santiago, C. Montes. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the doñana social-ecological system in southwestern spain. Ecology and Society 16(1): 23. online http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art23/

Pearce D.W., Markandya A., Barbier E. 2000. Blueprint for a green economy. Earthscan, London . Pfeiffer J. M., Butz R.J., 2005. Assessing cultural and ecological variation in ethnobiological research: the importance of gender. Journal of Ethnobiology 25(2):240-278. 2005

Piano Territoriale Provinciale Generale 2010. Supplemento ordinario n.45 "Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Lazio" n.9 del 6 marzo 2010.

Price, C., 1999. Contingent valuation and retrograde information bias. In Park, A. and Stewart Roper, C. (Eds) The Living Forest. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Non-market Benefits of Forestry, Edinburgh, June 1996, TSO, London (1999): 37-44.

Provincia di Roma 2009. La Provincia Capitale: rapporto annuale sull’area romana 2007-2008.

R Development Core Team 2008. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <http://www.Rproject.org> (downloaded on January 2009).

Rist, L., R. Uma Shaanker, E. J. Milner-Gulland, and J. Ghazoul. 2010. The use of traditional ecological knowledge in forest management: an example from India. Ecology and Society 15(1): 3. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art3/

Ryana A. M., Spash C. L. (2011). WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. Journal of Economic Psychology. 32 (5): 674–687

Schwartz B. 1993. Why altruism is impossible... and ubiquitous. Social Service Review. 67(3): 314-343 Shama S. 1995. Landscape and Memory. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Shen, X., Tan J. 2012. Ecological conservation, cultural preservation, and a bridge between: the journey of Shanshui Conservation Center in the Sanjiangyuan region, Qinghai-tibetan Plateau, China. Ecology and Society 17(4): 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05345-170438

Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, Kenyon W, Shannon P, Hill G. 2009. Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68: 955 – 964.

TEEB 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers – Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature.

Tolley G, Fabian RG. 1998. Issues in improvement of the valuation of non market goods. Resource and Energy Economics 20: 75-83.

UNESCO 1971. Ramsar’s Convention. UNESCO Press, New York. V.A., 2010. Rapporto sullo sviluppo socio economico del litorale del Lazio. Litorale S.p.A., Roma, Italy. ISBN 978-80-6060-264-0

Whittington D., Pagiola, S. 2011. Using contingent valuation in the design of payments for environmental services mechanisms: a review and assessment. MPRA Paper 32730, University Library of Munich, Germany. (online 10 August 2011) URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/view/subjects/Q5.html