Theory-U and Emergent Innovation. Presencing as a method of bringing forth profoundly new knowledge and realities

Peschl, Markus F. and Fundneider, Thomas (2013): Theory-U and Emergent Innovation. Presencing as a method of bringing forth profoundly new knowledge and realities. Published in: In O. Gunnlaugson, C. Baron, and M. Cayer (Eds.), Perspectives on Theory U: Insights from the field, pp. 207–233. Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference/IGI Global (2013): pp. 207-233.

Abstract

Abstract: One of the big challenges in the field of innovation is to create something radically new and at the same time something that has been “waited for”, although nobody has explicitly known or seen it; something that—despite its perhaps radical newness—appears just in the right time at the right place (“kairos”) and organically fits in the existing environment (be it a market, an organization, a culture, or society). This chapter introduces an alternative approach to innovation and presents both its theoretical foundation and a concrete well-proven innovation process: Emergent Innovation. Besides other concepts from the fields of innovation, cognitive science, and epistemology, this approach is based on C.O.Scharmer’s Theory U. It will be shown that a new kind of “cognition and epistemology of potentiality” is necessary in order to accomplish such processes as “learning from the future” and “listening to the future as it emerges”. It involves a whole new set of cognitive abilities, attitudes and epistemological virtues, such as radical openness, deep observation and understanding skills, reframing, etc. The second part of this chapter presents the Emergent Innovation approach that applies these theoretical concepts in a concrete process design. It is a socio-epistemological innovation technology bringing forth profoundly new knowledge and innovations having the qualities explicated above. The practical concepts, the implications as well as the learnings from and for Theory U will be discussed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Design | Innovation | Organisationales Lernen | emergent innovation | Innovation | Presencing | Scharmer, C.O. | potential | new | future | socio-epistemological technology
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P0 - General

References

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

Aristotle (2000). On the soul (De anima). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.mb.txt (date of download: 02.04.2011)

Aristotle (2007). Metaphysics. Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html (date of download: 02.04.2011)

Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36(2), 274–287.

Baecker, D. (2002). Wozu Sysetme? Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.

Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2002). Connectionism and the mind. Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks (second.). Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London; New York: Routledge.

Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–93.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, S. M. (2009). Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition). Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/ (date of download: 21.02.2012)

Cole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We have met technology and it is us. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology. The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. (pp. 209–227). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.

Corning, P. A. (2002). The re-emergence of “emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity, 7(6), 18–30.

Costa, A. C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32(5), 605–622.

Department of Trade and Industry (UK). (2005). Creativity, design and business performance (No. 15). London: DTI Economics Paper. Retrieved from: http://www.dti.gov.uk/economics/economics_paper15.pdf (date of download: 08.02.2006)

Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware. A pragmatics of experiencing. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2010). Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.

Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 30.

European Commission. (2008). Decision No 1350/2008/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 16 December 2008 concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009). Official Journal of the European Union, L 348, 115–117.

European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF (date of download: 03.02.2012)

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.) (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.

Foerster, H. V. (Ed.). (2003). Understanding understanding. Essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Fontana, W. (2001). Novelty in evolution. Green paper for bio-evolutionary advanced concepts for NASA. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download doi=10.1.1.61.9487&rep=rep1&type=pdf (date of download: 25.02.2011)

Garcia, R., & Calatone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(20, 110–132.

Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (2000). The new cognitive neurosciences (second.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Glanville, R. (2007). Try again. Fail again. Fail better: the cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes. The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 36(9/10), 1173–1206.

Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995). Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.

Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.

Isaacs, W. N. (1999a). Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and life. New York: Doubleday Currency.

Isaacs, W. N. (1999b). Dialogic leadership. The Systems Thinker, 10(1), 1–5.

Jacoby, R., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). Innovation, growth, and getting to where you want to go. Design Management Review, 18(Winter 2007), 10–15.

Kaiser, A., & Fordinal, B. (2010). Creating a ba for generating self-transcending knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 928–942.

Kelley, T. (2004). The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis CRC Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2011). Principles of design and a trajectory of artificiality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 411–418.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (second.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Laurel, B. (Ed.). (2003). Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Menary, R. (Ed.). (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Moggridge, B., Suri, J. F., & Bray, D. (2007). People and prototypes. In B. Moggridge (Eds.), Designing interactions (pp. 641–735). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1(1), 2–10.

O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2009). Emergent Properties. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition). Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/properties-emergent (date of download: 21.02.2012)

Peschl, M. F. (2001). Constructivism, cognition, and science. An Investigation of its links and possible shortcomings. Foundations of Science, 6(1), 125–161.

Peschl, M. F. (2006). Modes of knowing and modes of coming to know. Knowledge creation and knowledge co-construction as socio-epistemological engineering in educational processes. Constructivist Foundations, 1(3), 111–123.

Peschl, M. F. (2007a). Enabling Spaces – epistemologische Grundlagen der Ermöglichung von Innovation und knowledge creation. In N. Gronau (Eds.), Professionelles Wissensmanagement. Erfahrungen und Visionen (pp. 362–372). Berlin: GITO.

Peschl, M. F. (2007b). Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation. Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Constructivist Foundations, 2(2-3), 136–145.

Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008). Emergent Innovation and Sustainable Knowledge Co-creation. A Socio-Epistemological Approach to "Innovation from within". In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, & others (Eds.), The Open Knowledge Society: A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto (Vol. CCIS (Communications in Computer and Information Science) 19, pp. 101–108). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (CCIS 19).

Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2011). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC), 9(1), 41–61.

Peschl, M. F., & Wiltschnig, S. (2008). Emergente Innovation und Enabling Spaces. Ermöglichungsräume für Prozesse der Knowledge Creation. In U. Lucke, M. C. Kindsmüller, S. Fischer, & others (Eds.), Proceedings der Tagungen Mensch & Computer 2008, DeLFI 2008 und Cognitive Design 2008 (pp. 446–451). Berlin: Logos.

Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations; the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.

Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: a concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37–57.

Rosch, E. (1999). Primary knowing: when perception happens from the whole field. Retrieved from: http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Rosch-1999.pdf (date of download: 06.05.2005)

Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Foundations (Vol. I). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.

Scharmer, C. O. (2000). Presencing: Learning from the future as it emerges. On the tacit dimension of leading revolutionary change. Helsinki School of Economics, Finnland and the MIT Sloan School of Management. Retrieved from: http://www.dialogonleadership.org/PresencingTOC.html (date of download: 02.02.2005)

Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–150.

Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.

Schein, E. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture and organizational learning. Organization Dynamics, 22(2), 44–51.

Schnetzler, N. (2005). The Idea Machine: How ideas can be produced industrially. Weinheim: Wiley -VCH.

Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence. Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.

Stein, E. (1986). Endliches und ewiges Sein. Versuch eines Aufstiegs zum Sinn des Seins. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.

Stephan, A. (1999). Varieties of emergentism. Evolution and Cognition, 5(1), 49–59.

Stephan, A. (2006). The dual role of “emergence” in the philosophy of mind and in cognitive science. Synthese, 151(3), 485–498.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble. Designing in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Varela, F. (2000). Three gestures of becoming aware. Retrieved from: http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Varela-2000.pdf (date of download: 27.04.2005)

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Webber, S. S. (2002). Leadership and trust facilitating cross-functional team success. Journal of Management Development, 21(3), 201–214.

Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations: the German text, with a revised English translation (1953) (third.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.