Peschl, Markus F. and Fundneider, Thomas (2014): Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology. Published in: Computers and Human Behavior No. 37 : pp. 346-359.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66542.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
knowledge creation and innovation. We refer to these artifacts as Enabling Spaces, and they comprise architectural, technological (ICT), social, cognitive, organizational, cultural, as well as emotional dimensions. The paper claims that innovation is a highly challenging social and epistemological process which needs to be facilitated and enabled through supporting (infra-)structures. Our starting point is that innovation can no longer be understood as a mechanistic knowledge creation process. The process of enabling is introduced as an alternative to such traditional approaches of innovation. Enabling is the main design principle that underpins Enabling Spaces and ICT plays an important role in it. These concepts will be illustrated by a case study and concrete examples. The paper culminates in the derivation of a set of design principles, ICT based and otherwise, for Enabling Spaces.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology |
English Title: | Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | artifact, design, enabling space, extended cognition, innovation, meaning, situated cognition, space |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General |
Item ID: | 66542 |
Depositing User: | Markus F. Peschl |
Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2015 04:28 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:26 |
References: | Allen, T. J., & Henn, G. W. (2007). The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam; London: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36, 274–287. Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s innovation jam. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 32–40. Boden, M. A. (Ed.). (1990). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London; New York: Routledge. Borgmann, A. (1999). Holding on to Reality; The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millennium. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 2008(June), 84–92. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements for a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–229). London: Routledge & K. Paul. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41. Christakis, N.A., & Fowler, J.H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little & Brown. Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351. Clark, A. (2001). Mindware. An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Cole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We have met technology and it is us. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology. The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. (pp. 209–227). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Corning, P. A. (2002). The re-emergence of “emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity, 7(6), 18–30. Corso, M., Martini, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2009). Innovation at the intersection between exploration, exploitation and discontinuity. Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital, 6(4), 324–340. Denning, P (2012). The Profession of IT. the Idea Idea: What if practices rather than ideas are the main source of innovation? Communications of the ACM, 2012 85(3), 30-32. Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware. A pragmatics of experiencing. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2010). Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dönitz, E., & others. (2010). Structured and documented collection of current signals for arising changes in innovation patterns (No. D 1.1). INFU – Innovation futures project Europe. Retrieved from http://www.innovation-futures.org/sites/default/files/INFU%20-%20Deliverable%201.1.%20Signals%20of%20change%20Feb%202010.pdf (date of download: 27.10.2010) Dorst, K. (2003). The problem of design problems. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Eds.), Expertise in design (pp. 135–147). Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press. Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. London: Heinemann. DTI. (2005). Creativity, design and business performance ( No. 15). London: DTI Economics Paper. Retrieved from http://www.dti.gov.uk/economics/economics_paper15.pdf (date of download: 08.02.2006) Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 30. Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38, 218–233. Foerster, H. v. (1972). Perception of the future and the future of perception. Instructional Science, 1, 31–43. Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2006). Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Garcia, R., & Calatone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132. Glanville, R. (1998). Re-searching design and designing research. Design Issues, 15(2), 88–91. Glanville, R. (2006). Construction and design. Constructivist Foundations, 1(3), 103–110. Glanville, R. (2007). Try again. Fail again. Fail better: the cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes. The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 36(9/10), 1173–1206. Glasersfeld, E. v. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–141. Glasersfeld, E. v. (1995). Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press. Helander, M., Lawrence, R., & others. (2007). Looking for great ideas: Analyzing the innovation jam. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (pp. 66–73). New York, NY: ACM Press. Hippel, E. v. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/books/sources/SofI.pdf (date of download: 04.11.2010) Hippel, E. v. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm (date of download: 04.11.2010) House, N. A. V. (2003). Science and technology studies and information studies. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (vol 38) (pp. 3–86). Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715–728. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20–31. Kaiser, A., & Fordinal, B. (2010). Creating a ba for generating self-transcending knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 928–942. Kelley, T. (2004). The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis CRC Press. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Principles of design and a trajectory of artificiality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 411–418. Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (2007). Semantics. Meanings and contexts of artifacts. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product Experience (pp. 1–25). New York: Elsevier. Krogh, G. v., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Laurel, B. (Ed.). (2003). Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5, 379–393. Menary, R. (Ed.). (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Müller, K. H. (2000). Wie Neues entsteht. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 11(1), 87–129. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow. A process theory of the knowledge based firm. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. O’Connor, G. C., & McDermott, C. M. (2004). The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 11 - 30. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002 Peschl, M. F. (2006a). Learning and teaching as socio-epistemological engineering. Enabling spaces of profound cogntive change, innovation, and knowledge ceation. In A. Mettinger, P. Oberhuemer, & C. Zwieauer (Eds.), eLearning an der Universtät Wien. Forschung - Entwicklung - Einführung (pp. 112–135). Münster: Waxmann. Peschl, M. F. (2006b). Socio-Epistemological Engineering: Epistemological issues in mobile learning technologies. Theoretical foundations and visions for enabling mobile learning labs. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), Mobile understanding. The epistemology of ubiquitous communication (pp. 145–157). Vienna: Passagen. Peschl, M. F. (2007a). Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation. Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Constructivist Foundations, 2(2-3), 136–145. Peschl, M. F. (2007b). Enabling Spaces – epistemologische Grundlagen der Ermöglichung von Innovation und knowledge creation. In N. Gronau (Ed.), Professionelles Wissensmanagement. Erfahrungen und Visionen (pp. 362–372). Berlin: GITO. Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008a). Emergent Innovation and Sustainable Knowledge Co-creation. A Socio-Epistemological Approach to "Innovation from within". In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, & others (Eds.), The Open Knowledge Society: A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto (Vol. 19, pp. 101–108). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (CCIS 19). Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008b). Emergent Innovationóa Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Change and Radically New Knowledge as Core Challenges in Knowledge Management. In K. Tochtermann & H. Maurer (Eds.), iknow 08 (International Conference on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology) (pp. 11–18). Graz. Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC), 9(1), 41–61. Peschl, M. F., & Wiltschnig, S. (2008). Emergente Innovation und Enabling Spaces. Ermöglichungsräume für Prozesse der Knowledge Creation. In U. Lucke & others (Eds.), Proceedings der Tagungen Mensch & Computer 2008, DeLFI 2008 und Cognitive Design 2008 (pp. 446–451). Berlin: Logos. Peschl, M. F., Raffl, C., Fundneider, T., & Blachfellner, S. (2010). Creating sustainable futures by innovation from within. Radical change is in demand of radical innovation. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems 2010 (pp. 354–359). Wien. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit from Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 13(3), 399-441. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. Rusman, E., Bruggen, J. van, Sloep, P., & Koper, R. (2010). Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a trustworthiness antecedents (TWAN) schema. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(11), 834-850. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.003 Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–150. Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning. Schmid, K. (1996). Making AI systems more creative: the IPC-model. Knowledge- Based Systems, 9(6), 385-397. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (second.). New York: Harper. Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Awakening Faith in an Alternative Future. Reflections. The SoL Journal on Knowledge, Learning, and Change, 5(7), 1–16. Sie, R. L. L., Bitter-Rijpkema, M., & Sloep, P. B. (2011). What ’ s in it for me ? Recommendation of Peers in Networked Innovation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(12), 1659-1672. Retrieved from http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/3467 Stephan, A. (2006). The dual role of “emergence” in the philosophy of mind and in cognitive science. Synthese, 151, 485–498. Stillings, N. A. (1995). Cognitive Science. An Introduction (second.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble. Designing in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Verganti, R. (2006). Innovating through design. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 114–121. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity : beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman. Wiltschnig, S., & Peschl, M. F. (2008). Enabling Enabling Spaces for Knowledge Creation and Innovation. In M. Bohanec & others (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Multiconference Information Society – IS 2008. Ljubljana: Inst. Jozef Stefan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66542 |