White, Howard (2007): Evaluating Aid Impact.
Download (129kB) | Preview
The ultimate measure of aid effectiveness is how aid ffects the lives of poor people in developing countries. The huge literature on aid’s macroeconomic impact has remarkably little to say on this topic, and less still in terms of practical advice to government officials and aid administrators on how to improve development effectiveness. But there is an expanding toolbox of approaches to impact evaluation at the field level which can answer both questions of whether aid works, and, properly applied, why it works (or not, as the case may be). This paper lays out these approaches, describing some of their uses by official development agencies. I advocate a theory based approach to impact evaluation design, as this is most likely to yield policy insights. Academics need to engage in these real world issues and debates if their work is to help alleviate the plight of the world’s poor.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Evaluating Aid Impact|
|Keywords:||aid effectiveness, impact evaluation, quasi-experimental design, results agenda|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O22 - Project Analysis
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
|Depositing User:||Howard White|
|Date Deposited:||13. Jan 2008 05:23|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 17:52|
Angrist, J. D., and V. Lavy (1999). ‘Using Maimonides’ Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (2): 533-75.
Arjumand and Associates (2004). ‘Impact Assessment of Kashf’s Microfinance and Karvaan Enterprise Development Programme’. Report prepared for DIFD Pakistan. Islamabad: Arjumand and Associates.
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) (2005). ‘Impact Evaluation of the Thailand-Australia HIV/AIDS Ambulatory Care Project’. Evaluation and Review Series No. 37. Canberra: AusAID.
Banerjee, A., S. Cole, E. Duflo, and L. Linden (2006). ‘Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India’. CEPR Discussion Paper 5446. London: Centre for Economic Policy and Research.
Brandt, W. (1980). North-South: A Program for Survival. London: Pan Books.
CGD (Center for Global Development) (2006). ‘When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives through Impact Evaluation’. Washington, DC: CGD, Evaluation Gap Working Group.
Coady, D. (2003). ‘Alleviating Structural Poverty in Developing Countries: The Approach of PROGRESA in Mexico’. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Danida (2001). Evaluation: In the Wake of a Flagship. Ex-post Impact Study of the Noakhali Rural Development Project in Bangladesh. Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.
Danida (2002). The Agricultural Development Project in Tete, Mozambique: An Impact Study. Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.
FINNIDA (1996). Zambia Road Assistance Project: Phase II. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Department for International Development Cooperation.
FINNIDA (2001). ‘Finland’s Support to Water Supply and Sanitation’, Helsinki: Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Department for International Development Cooperation.
Galiani, S., and E. Schargrodsky (2006). ‘Property Rights for the Poor: Effects of Land Titling’. Available at www.tinyurl.com/ndw69.
Glewwe, P., M. Kremer, and S. Moulin (2001) ‘Textbooks and Test Scores: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya’. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank.
Glewwe, P., M. Kremer, S. Moulin, and E. Zitzewitz (2004). ‘Retrospective vs. Prospective Analyses of School Inputs: The Case of Flip Charts in Kenya’. Journal of Development Economics, 74 (1): 251–68.
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (2006a). ‘Impact Evaluation of a Youth Job Training Program in the Dominican Republic: Ex-Post Project Evaluation Report of the Labor Training and Modernization Project’. Ex-Post Project Evaluation Report OVE/EPPER-03/06, Washington, DC: IDB.
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (2006b). ‘Impact Evaluation of the Job Training Component (PROCAJOVEN) of the Assistance Program for the Building of a Training and Employment System in Panama’. Ex-Post Project Evaluation Report OVE/EPPER-02/06. Washington, DC: IDB.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2005). ‘Republic of the Gambia: Rural Finance and Community Initiatives Project’. Interim Evaluation Report No. 1623-GM. Rome: IFAD.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2006a). ‘Republic of Ghana: Upper West Agricultural Development Project’. Interim Evaluation Report No. 1758-GH. Rome: IFAD.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2006b). ‘Republic of Ghana: Upper East Region Land Conservation and Smallholder Rehabilitation Project (LACOSREP) - Phase II’. Report No. 1757-GH. Rome: IFAD.
Jalan, J., and E. Glinskaya (2005). ‘Improving Primary School Education in India: An Impact Assessment of DPEP I’. Washington, DC: World Bank. Mimeo.
Ohlin, G. (1970). ‘The Evolution of Aid Doctrine’. In J. Bhagwati and R. Eckaus (eds), Foreign Aid, excerpts of Goran Ohlin (1966) The Evolution of Aid . Harmondsworth: Penquin.
Olken, B. (2005). ‘Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia’. NBER Working Paper 11753. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Pearson, L. (1969). Partners in Development: Report of the Commission on International Development. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Rawlings, L., L. Darling Sherburne-Benz, and J. Van Domelen (2004). Evaluating Social Funds: A Cross-Country Analysis of Community Investments (Regional and Sectoral Studies). Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and World Bank.
Schwartz, J. B., and I. Bhushan (2006). ‘Cambodia: Using Contracting to Reduce Inequity in Primary Health Care Delivery’. In D. Gwatkin, A. Wagstaff and A. Yazbeck (eds), Reaching the Poor with Health, Nutrition, and Population Services: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Washington, DC: World Bank.
UNCDF (2003). Microfinance Programme Impact Assessment. New York: UNCDF.
White, H. (1992). ‘The Macroeconomic Impact of Development Aid: A Critical Survey’. Journal of Development Studies, 28 (2): 163-240.
White, H. (2007) ‘Evaluating Aid Impact: Approaches and Findings’. In S. Lahiri (ed.), The Theory and Practice of Foreign Aid, vol. 1. New York: Elsevier.
World Bank (2000). ‘Agricultural Extension: The Kenya Experience’. Washington, DC: Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank.
World Bank (2003). ‘Books, Buildings and Learning Outcomes: An Impact Evaluation of World Bank Support to Basic Education in Ghana’. Washington, DC: Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank.
World Bank (2005). ‘Maintaining Momentum to 2015? An Impact Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition Outcomes in Bangladesh’. Washington, DC: Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank.
World Bank (2007). ‘The Irrigation Paradox: Poverty Reduction with Low Economic Returns. An Impact Evaluation of Irrigation in Andhra Pradesh’. Washington, DC: Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank.