Il monitoraggio civico delle politiche di coesione e lo sviluppo di comunità civiche

Buttiglione, Paola Liliana and Reggi, Luigi (2015): Il monitoraggio civico delle politiche di coesione e lo sviluppo di comunità civiche. Forthcoming in: Prisma Economia-Società-Lavoro , Vol. 1, No. 2015

Abstract

Social capital is one of the main determinants of the institutional capacity of local governments which can positively influence the impact of development policies and, ultimately, regional socio-economic performances. In particular, the economic backwardness and many unresolved issues in Southern Italy are often explained by low levels of social engagement. Open government data on projects funded by public money can enable new forms of engagement, like the citizen based monitoring of public policy. Citizen monitoring of development policies in Southern Italy can strengthen existing civic communities and create new ones. Furthermore, citizen monitoring has the potential to directly influence the quality of policy-making by collecting evidence on how projects are progressing. This evidence can be harnessed by local governments to improve the implementation of current policy and/or to plan new actions. The paper analyses the case of “Monithon”, an independent initiative aimed at enabling new forms of “citizen monitoring” of EU and national policies for territorial cohesion in Italy. Through this initiative, citizens are able to collect evidence on the progress and results of the projects funded by European and national Cohesion Policy in Italy, based on the official data from OpenCoesione, a governmental open data portal developed by the Department for Cohesion and Economic Development, Ministry of Economic Development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Citizen monitoring of cohesion policies and the development of civic communities
• Language: Italian
• Keywords: Citizen monitoring; Civic communities; Open Data; Institutions; Open Government Data; Social capital; EU Regional Policy; Cohesion Policy; European Policy
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O35 - Social Innovation; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, Crown Publishing, NewYork

Barca F., (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy (disponibile online)

Barca F., Mc Cann P.A., (2012) “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based Versus Place-neutral Approaches”, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 52, pp. 134-152

Canova L.,Vetrò A., Torchiano M., Morando F., (2014) OpenCoesione and Monithon: a transparency effort, W3C Share-PSI 2.0 Workshop, Samos, Greece, 30 June -1 July2014 (disponibile online)

Charron N., Dijkstra L, Lapuente V., (2014) “Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 52, pp. 134–152

Davies T., (2012) Supporting open data use through active engagement, position paper presented at the W3C Using Open Data Workshop (disponibile online)

De Blasio G., Sestito P., (2011) Il capitale Sociale, Donzelli Editore, Roma

Osimo D. (2008) “Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How?”, European Commission Joint Research Centre

Osimo D., (2010) “A short history of Goverment 2.0: from cool projects to policy impact” in Gøtze J.-Pedersen C. B. (a cura di), State of eUnion: Government 2.0 and Onwards, AuthorHouse, Bloomsbury

Keane J., (2009) Monitory democracy and media-saturated societies, Griffith REVIEW Edition 24: Participation Society (disponibile online)

Lanfrey D., (2011) “Il Movimento dei grillini tra meetup, meta-organizzazione e democrazia del monitoraggio”, in Mosca L.-Vaccari C. (a cura di), Nuovi media, nuova politica? Partecipazione e mobilitazione online da MoveOn al MoVimento 5 stelle, Franco Angeli, Milano, pp. 143-166

MacIntosh A., (2004) Characterizing e-participation in policy-making, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (disponibile online)

Picci, L. (2012) Reputation-Based Governance and Making States “Legible” to Their Citizens, in Masum H. and Tovey M. The Reputation Society - How Online Opinions Are Reshaping the Offline World, The MIT Press

Putnam R. D., (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton

Reggi L., Ricci C.A., (2011) “Information Strategies for Open Government in Europe: EU Regions Opening Up the Data on Structural Funds”, in Electronic Government - Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6846, 2011, pp 173-184

Rodríguez-Pose A. 2013 “Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?”, Regional Studies, 47, 7, 1034

Schudson M., (1998) The Good Citizen. A History of American Civic Life, Martin Kessler Books, New York