Ravichandran, Archana and Bhaduri, Saumitra (2015): Diversification and firm performance: A study of Indian manufacturing firms.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68013.pdf Download (245kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The advantages and disadvantages of diversification and its impact on productivity or performance of a firm have been debated upon by academics and business professionals all over, although views on the topic still differ widely. While popular views are that related diversification increases value and unrelated diversification decreases value, the results of research conducted on the effects of overall diversification (without distinguishing between related and unrelated diversification) on productivity are of conflicting nature.
This paper focuses on this relationship in the context of the Indian manufacturing sector. Along with this, it also expounds on the existence of an optimal diversification point for the Indian context. Data used is obtained from CMIE Prowess for the period 2003 to 2014 and standard econometric analysis on panel data is carried out to find the stated relationship. Tobin’s q is used as a measure of performance of the firm. The results show that highly diversified firms perform poorly on account of vertical diversification while horizontal diversification has a positive effect on performance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Diversification and firm performance: A study of Indian manufacturing firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | productivity, diversification, Tobin’s q, related, unrelated |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope |
Item ID: | 68013 |
Depositing User: | Ms Archana Ravichandran |
Date Deposited: | 02 Dec 2015 13:03 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 20:11 |
References: | Martin, John D., and Akin Sayrak. "Corporate diversification and shareholder value: a survey of recent literature." Journal of Corporate Finance 9.1 (2003): 37-57. Berger, Philip G., and Eli Ofek. "Diversification's effect on firm value." Journal of financial economics 37.1 (1995): 39-65. Chang, Hsihui, et al. "A Re-Examination of Diversification and Firm Productivity." Journal of Management Accounting Research 25.1 (2013): 99-118. Schoar, Antoinette. "Effects of corporate diversification on productivity." The Journal of Finance 57.6 (2002): 2379-2403. Gomes, Joao, and Dmitry Livdan. "Optimal diversification: Reconciling theory and evidence." The Journal of Finance 59.2 (2004): 507-535. Lang, Larry HP, and Rene M. Stulz. Tobin's q, corporate diversification and firm performance. No. w4376. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1993. Villalonga, Belen. "Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series." Journal of Finance (2004): 479-506. Jacquemin, Alexis P., and Charles H. Berry. "Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth." The Journal of Industrial Economics (1979): 359-369. Kogut, Bruce, Gordon Walker, and Jaideep Anand. "Agency and institutions: National divergences in diversification behavior." Organization science 13.2 (2002): 162-178. Montgomery, Cynthia A., and Birger Wernerfelt. "Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q." The Rand journal of economics (1988): 623-632. Tobin, James. "A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory." Journal of money, credit and banking 1.1 (1969): 15-29. Delios, Andrew, and Paul W. Beamish. "Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms." Japanese subsidiaries in the new global economy 47 (2001). Anagol, Santosh, and Ankur Pareek. "Diversification and Firm Performance: Evidence from Business Group Owned Mutual Funds in India." (2013). Villalonga, Belen. "Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from BITS establishment-level data." New evidence from BITS Establishment-Level Data. AFA (2003). Servaes, Henri. "The value of diversification during the conglomerate merger wave." Journal of Finance (1996): 1201-1225. Campa, Jose Manuel, and Simi Kedia. "Explaining the diversification discount."The Journal of Finance 57.4 (2002): 1731-1762. Maksimovic, Vojislav, and Gordon Phillips. "The market for corporate assets: Who engages in mergers and asset sales and are there efficiency gains?."Journal of finance (2001): 2019-2065. Khanna, Tarun, and Krishna Palepu. "Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups." Journal of finance(2000): 867-891. Campa, J.-M., Kedia, S., 1999. Explaining the diversification discount. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Business School (April). Lichtenberg, F.R., 1992. Industrial dediversification and its consequences for productivity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18, 427– 438. Fan, J.P.H., Lang, L.H.P., 1999. The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification. Hong Kong University, unpublished manuscript (September). Maksimovic, V., Philips, G., 2001. Do conglomerate firms allocate resources efficiently. Journal of Finance, in press. Khanna, N., Palepu, K., 1999. Corporate Scope and Institutional Context: An Empirical Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68013 |