Finite Change – Implication for Trade Theory, Policy and Development

Marjit, Sugata and Mandal, Biswajit (2014): Finite Change – Implication for Trade Theory, Policy and Development.

Abstract

The paper traces the evolution of trade theory beyond the standard 2X2 models and looks for implications of higher dimensional structures and adjustment problems with large shocks. Typically trade theory and policy talk about expansion and contraction of existing activities. In this paper we explore various situations where certain activities vanish altogether. Similarly other activities may come to existence following major changes in the economic environment. Such regime shifts are interpreted as finite changes as opposed to infinitesimal alterations. These changes allow us to think differently about standard policy changes, all of which have direct implications for developing countries. Emigration, wage inequality and distribution, non-equivalence of tariff and quota in competitive models, capital mobility and corruption are some of the applications involving such finite change. At a theoretical level the paper starts by an interesting interpretation of factor price “non-equalization” hypothesis in the basic Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson type models without depending on standard text book type argument.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: General Equilibrium, Trade
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade

References

Beladi, H. and S. Marjit (1992) - Foreign Capital and Protectionism, Canadian Journal of Economics, 25(1), pp 233-38.

Beladi, H., S. Kar and S. Marjit (2013) - Emigration, Finite Changes and Wage Inequality, Economics and Politics (forthcoming).

Choi, E. Kwan and S. Marjit (1998) - On the Non-Equivalence of Tariff and Quota in a Competitive General Equilibrium Framework, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, 98-060/2, Tinbergen Institute.

Dutta, M., S. Kar and S. Marjit (2013) – Product variety, finite changes and wage inequality, mimeo, CSSSC.

Feenstra, R.C (2004) - Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Findlay, R and R. W. Jones (2000) “Factor bias and technical progress” Economics Letters, 68, 303–308.

Jones, R.W (1974) – The small country in a many commodity world, Australian Economic Papers, 13, pp 225-236.

Jones, R.W. and S. Marjit (1992) - International Trade and Endogenous Production Structures, in W. Neuefeind and R. Riezman (eds.), Economic Theory and InternationalTrade: Essays in Memoriam J. Trout Rader. pp 95-107, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, USA.

Krugman, Paul R. (1979) - Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade, Journal of International Economics, 9(4), pp 469-479.

Krugman, Paul R. (1981) - Intra-industry specialisation and the gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp 959–73.

Mandal, B. and S. Marjit (2012) - Capital inflow, vanishing sector and wage distribution in an economy with corruption related intermediation, Economics Bulletin, 32 (3), pp 2128-2135.

Marjit, S. (1991) - Agro-based industry and rural-urban migration : A case for an urban employment subsidy, Journal of Development Economics, 35(2), pp 393-398.

Marjit, S. (2003) - Economic reform and informal wage--a general equilibrium analysis, Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), pp 371-378.

Marjit, S. and H. Beladi (1996) - Protection and the gainful effects of foreign capital, Economics Letters, 53(3), pp 311-316.

Marjit, S. and H. Beladi (1999) - Complementarity between Import Competition and Import Promotion, Journal of Economic Theory, 86(2), pp 280-285.

Marjit, S and S. Kar (2005) - Emigration and Wage Inequality, Economics Letters, 88, pp.141-145.

Marjit, S and S. Kar (2011) - International Capital Flow, Finite Change and Two-sided Wage Inequality, mimeo, CSSSC.

Melitz, M. (2003) - The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, 71, pp 1695-1725.