Jael, Paul (2015): Prix, taux de profit cible et prévention de l’entrée.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69015.pdf Download (195kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since the marginalist controversy held from 1939 to the mid-fifties, the full cost principle presents itself as an alternative to the marginalist theory of the producer’s equilibrium, without being able to shake its dominance. Yet, through decades, empirical investigations are rather favourable to it. Its rationality has not been sufficiently emphasized; so, orthodoxy was able to belittle it as an empirical practice compatible with its own precepts.
The present article shows that three principles stated by the full costers and their successors would allow to build a sound theory of full cost pricing. These are: - preventing entry of new competitors; - target rate of profit; - competitive price leadership
The article proves that full cost pricing is more conducive to profit maximization than marginalist rule, especially in the case of a competitive market with few suppliers, a market structure usually neglected by microeconomics. Opponents to full cost pricing often consider changes in demand as its Achilles heel. The present article analyses this problem in depth.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Prix, taux de profit cible et prévention de l’entrée |
English Title: | Price, Target Rate of Profit and Entry Preventing |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | prix; concurrence; structure de marché; full cost |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D40 - General D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D49 - Other |
Item ID: | 69015 |
Depositing User: | Paul Jael |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jan 2016 23:08 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 18:19 |
References: | References Andrews, P.W.S. 1959. Manufacturing Business. Macmillan London. Bain, Joe S. 1950. “A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly”. American Economic Review, vol 39: 448-464. Bhagwati Jagdish N. 1970. “Oligopoly Theory, Entry Prevention, and Growth”. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 22 n°3 (Nov), 297-310. Blinder, Alan S. 1994. “On Sticky prices: Academic Theories Meet the Real World” in Monetary Policy Editor Gregory Mankiw. The University of Chicago Press pp 117-154. Chamberlin, Edward Hastings. 1962. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachussetts. Edwards, H. R. 1955. “Price Formation in Manufacturing Industry and Excess Capacity”. Oxford Economic Papers 7 (1) Dec : 94-118. Farm, Ante. 2014. “Competitive Price Leadership”. www2.sofi.su.se/ -afa/docs/Competitive_Price_Leadership.pdf Godley, W.A.H, and W.D. Nordhaus. 1972. “Pricing in the Trade Cycle”. The Economic Journal, vol 82 September: 853-882. Hall, R.L., and C.J. Hitch. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behaviour”. Oxford Economic Papers 2 (May): 12-45. Harrod, R.F. 1952. Economic Essays. Harcourt, Brace and company, New York. Heflebower, Richard B. 1955. “Full Costs, Cost Changes, and Prices” in Business Concentration and Price Policy. Princeton University Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0969.pdf Jael, Paul. 2014. Full Cost, Profit and Competition. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59630/ Kalecki, Michal. 1938. “The Determinants of Distribution of the National Income”. Econometrica 6 (2) (April) : 97-112. Kalecki, Michal. (1943) 1971. “Cost and Prices” in Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy. Cambridge University Press. Lanzillotti, Robert F. 1957. “Competitive Price Leadership- A Critique of Price Leadership Models”. The Review of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 34, 55-64. Lanzillotti, Robert F. 1958. “Pricing Objectives in Large Companies”. American Economic Review 18 (5) December: 921-940. Lee, F.S. 1999. Post Keynesian Price Theory. Cambridge University Press (Virtual Publishing). Cambridge. Lee F.S., and J. Irving-Lessman. 1992. “The Fate of an Errant Hypothesis: The Doctrine of Normal-Cost Prices”. History of Political Economy 24:2 : 373-309. Lucas, M.R. 2003. “Pricing decision and the neoclassical theory of the firm”. Management Accounting Research, 14: 201-207. Machin, Stephen, and John Van Reenen.1993. “Profit Margins and the Business Cycle: Evidence from UK Manufacturing Firms”. The Journal of Industrial Economics 41 (1): 29-50. Machlup, Fritz. 1946. “Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research” . American Economic Review 36 (September): 519-554. Modigliani, Franco. 1958. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front”. Journal of Political Economy, 66(3) June, 215-232. Mongin, Philippe. 1992. “The Full-Cost Controversy of the 1940s and the 1950s: A Methodological Assessment”. History of Political Economy 24:2 311-356. Nubbemeyer, Elmar. 2010, A Reconsideration of Full-Cost Pricing. www.edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12313/2/nubbemeyer_Elmar.pdf. Oliver, Henry M. 1947. “Marginal Theory and Business Behavior”. American Economic Review 37 (June): 375-383. Ray, Korok, and Jacob Gramlich. 2012. Full-Cost Pricing and Economic Pricing: Reconciling Two Approaches. www.korokray.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/fcpep.pdf Robinson, Austin. 1950. “The Pricing of Manufactured Products”. The Economic Journal 51: 771-780. Robinson, Joan. 1946. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Macmillan and co, London. Rotemberg, Julio J, and Michael Woodford. 1999. “The Cyclical Behavior of Prices and Costs”. NBER Working Paper Series. Working paper 6909. www.nber.org/papers/w6909 Rotemberg, Julio J. 1982. “Sticky Prices in the United States”. The Journal of Political Economy 90 (6): 1187-1211. Schumpeter J. ([1943] 1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge, London and New York. Stigler, George J. 1968. The Organization of Industry. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood Illinois. Sylos-Labini. 1962. Oligopoly and Technical Progress. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachussetts. Sylos-Labini, Paolo. 1971. « La théorie des prix en régime d’oligopole et la théorie du développement ». Revue d’économie politique. 81 (2) : 244-272. Sylos-Labini, Paolo. 2007. “Oligopoly: Static and Dynamic Analysis”. Revue d’économie Industrielle, 118 (2e trimestre): 91-107. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69015 |