Matei, Ani and Savulescu, Carmen (2014): Enhancing the capacity for innovation of public administration. An exploratory study on e-Governance, ICT, knowledge management in Romania. Published in: Theoretical and Applied Economics , Vol. XXI, No. 11(600) (30 December 2014): pp. 7-26.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69148.pdf Download (438kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Beyond the role of public sector as driver of innovation in the economy, for the time being, we witness the necessity of boosting innovation in the public sector itself, in view to improve productivity, efficiency, as well as to enhance the creation of public value. The new concept concerning the capacity for innovation of public administration reflects the synergy between the traditional instruments of administrative innovation (planning, strategy etc.) and the modern ones (ICT, e-governance, knowledge management in public administration). The current paper is accomplishing an empirical analysis through operationalization of a conceptual model on the capacity for innovation of public administration. Thus, the paper analyses e-Governance, ICT and knowledge management in the Romanian Prefect institutions by identification, analysis and evaluation of the factors contributing to the improvement of public service quality, effectiveness, efficiency, transparency and citizen participation, strengthening trust and legality.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Enhancing the capacity for innovation of public administration. An exploratory study on e-Governance, ICT, knowledge management in Romania |
English Title: | Enhancing the Capacity for Innovation of Public Administration: An exploratory study on e-Governance, ICT, knowledge management in Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | e-Governance, ICT, knowledge management, innovation, public administration modernisation |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O35 - Social Innovation |
Item ID: | 69148 |
Depositing User: | ANI I MATEI |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jun 2018 15:46 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 20:05 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J., Johnson, S. (2001), “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”, American Economic Review, 91(5), pp. 1369-1401 St. Aubyn, M. (2008), Modernising public administration and economic growth, Paper presented at the European Central Bank Public Finance Workshop: Challenges for government spending in the EU, Frankfurt, 6 December 2007, Mimeo Bason, C. (2010), Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-creating for a better society, Policy Press,Portland, USA Bekkers V., Homburg, V. (eds.) (2005), The information ecology of e-government, E-government as Institutional and Technological innovation in Public Administration. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 1-19 Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J, Steijn, B. (2011), Innovation in the Public Sector, Palgrave MacMillan,p. 3 Borins, S. (2008), Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition and Replication,Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Davenport, T. (1993), Process Innovations: Reengineering Work through Information Technology,Boston MA, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 1-7 Fuglsang, L., Pedersen, J. (2011). „How Common Is Public Sector Innovation and How Similar Is It to Private Sector Innovation”, in Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J, Steijn, B. (2011), Innovation in the Public Sector, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 44-60 Von Hippel, E. (2007), “Horizontal innovation networks – by and for users”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-23 Knack, S., Keefer, P. (1995), Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures, Economics and Politics, 7(3), pp. 207-228 Lewin, A.Y., Massini, S., Peeters, C. (2011), “Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines”, Organization Science, 22(1): pp. 81-98 Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and Growth , Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), pp. 681-712 Olson, M., Sarna, N., Swamy, A. (2000), Governance and Growth: A Simple Hypothesis Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Productivity Growth, Public Choice, 102(3-4) ,pp. 341-364 Osborne, S., Brown, K, (2005), Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations, Routledge Oudshoorn, N., Pinch, T. (2003), How users matter. The co-construction of Users and Technology,Cambridge Mass, MIT Press, pp. 126-137 Vera, D., Crossan, M. (2006), Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Toward an IntegrativeFramework. in M. Easterby-Smith, A. Lyles (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Blackwell Publishing COM (2013). 350 http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/nd/2013eccomm_en.pdf) DG Enterprise, (2011). Innobarometer 2010. Analytical report Innovation in Public Administration, Flash Eurobarometer, p. 305 European Commission,(2012), Excellence in Public Administration for Competitiveness in EU Member States, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/industrial-competitiveness/monitoringmember-states/improving-public-administration/files/pa_report_en.pdf OECD,(2011), Making the Most of Public Investment in a Tight Fiscal Environment: Multilevel Governance Lessons from the Crisis, Paris |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69148 |