o'higgins, s. niall and Sbriglia, Patrizia (2007): measures of social capital and trust.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_6924.pdf Download (266kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Trust and trustworthiness are important components of social capital and much attention has been devoted to the problems of their correct evaluation. Attitudinal survey questions as reported in the EVS – European Value Survey - are often regarded as inefficient indicators of trust, since they lack of behavioural underpinnings (Putnam, 1995) which one might desire when measuring trust. In this paper, we consider alternative measures of trust and trustworthiness, based on behavioural assumptions. We construct two relative behavioural measures of trust (RBM1 and RBM2), both based on the ex post measurement of trust, once individuals are informed on the level of trustworthiness of the social group to which they have been allocated during the experiment. Our main finding is that the relative behavioural measures show that trust strongly varies once the individual is informed on the on the level of trustworthiness of the social group to which he\she has been allocated during the experiment. This difference is higher the higher is the family level of income and the parental education status. As for previous findings (Glaeser et al., 2000, Lazzarini, 2005) which have found no correlation between attitudinal and behavioural measures of trust, we find that relative behavioural measures are not correlated to attitudinal measures but they are strongly correlated to groups’ trustworthiness. We also find that similar social preferences profiles (between Senders and Recipients) tend to enhance the individual level of trust, in the RBM2 context. This result seems to confirm the importance of the homogeneity of the social environment when studying the effects of policy interventions (Alesina and La Ferrara, 2002).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | measures of social capital and trust |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | social capital, trust, experiments |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General |
Item ID: | 6924 |
Depositing User: | patrizia sbriglia |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jan 2008 12:49 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 01:23 |
References: | Alesina A., La Ferrara, E., (2000) “Participation in Heterogeneous Communities”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 45, 847-904. Alesina A., La Ferrara, E., (2002) “Who Trust others?” Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207-234. Barr A., M Lindelow., J. Garcia-Montalvo, P. Serneels (2005), “Strategy Choice and Cognitive Ability in Field Experiments”, GPRG – WPS - 034. Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K., (1995) , “Trust, Reciprocity and Social History”, Games and Economic Behaviour 10, 122-142. Burlando R. M., F. Guala (2005), “Heterogeneous Agents in Public Good Experiments”, Experimental Economics, 8: 35-54. Coleman J. S., “Foundation of Social Theory”, Belknap Press, Cambridge M.A. Ciriolo E. (2007), “Inequity aversion and trustees’ reciprocity in the trust game”, European Journal Political Economy, article in press. Fehr E. and K.M. Schmidt (1999), “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 816-818. Fehr E. and K.M. Schmidt (2006), “Experimental Evidence and New Theories”, in S-C. Kolm and J.M. Ythier (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Vol. I, North-Holland, Amsterdam. Degli Antoni G., (2005), “Le determinanti del Capitale Sociale. Analisi e Verifica Empirica a livello Micro e Macroeconomico”, working paper Università di Ferrara. Glaeser E. L., Laibson D., Scheinkman J. A., Soutter C. L., (2000) “Measuring Trust”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 65, 811-846. Güth, W., S. Huck, W. Mueller (2001) “The relevance of equal split in ultimatum games”, Games and Economic Behaviour, 37: 161-69. Knack S., Keefer P., (1997) “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1251-1288. Lazzarini S. G., Madalozzo R., Artes R., De Oliveira Sequeira J. (2005) “Measuring Trust: An Experiment in Brazil”, IBMEC working Paper. Paldam M., Svendsen, G. T., (2000) “An Essay on Social Capital: Looking for the Fire beyond the Smoke”, European Journal Political Economy, 16, 339-366. Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanetti R., (1993) “Making Democracy Work”, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. Putnam R., (1995) “The Case of Missing Social Capital”, mimeo. Putnam R., (2000) “Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community” Simon and Schuster, NJ. Selten R. (1967), “Die Strategiemethode zur erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen verhaltens in rahmen eimes oligopolexperiments” in Sauerman, H. (ed) Beiträge Zur Experimentallen Wirtschaftsforschung, Tübingen: J.C.B., Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Van Schaig T., (2002) “Social Capital in the Euoropean Values Surveys”, working paper series Tilburg University. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/6924 |