Rey, Sergio (2016): Space-time patterns of rank concordance: Local indicators of mobility association with application to spatial income inequality dynamics. Forthcoming in: Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69480.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the study of income inequality dynamics, the concept of exchange mobility plays a central role. Applications of classical rank correlation statistics have been used to assess the degree to which individual economies swap positions in the income distribution over time. These classic measures ignore the underlying geographical pattern of these rank changes. Rey (2004) introduced a spatial concordance statistic as an extension of Kendall’s rank correlation statistic, a commonly employed measure of exchange mobility. This article suggests local forms of the global spatial concordance statistic: Local Indicators of Mobility Association (LIMA). The LIMA statistics allow for the decomposition of the global measure into the contributions associated with individual locations. They do so by considering the degree of concordance (stability) or discordance (exchange mobility) reflected within an economy’s local spatial context. Different forms of the LIMAs derive from alternative expressions of the neighborhood and neighbor set. Additionally, the additive decomposition of the LIMAs permits the development of a meso-level analytic to examine whether the overall space-time concordance is driven by either interregional or intraregional concordance. The measures are illustrated in a case study that examines regional income dynamics in Mexico.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Space-time patterns of rank concordance: Local indicators of mobility association with application to spatial income inequality dynamics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | space-time, concordance, inequality |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models |
Item ID: | 69480 |
Depositing User: | Sergio Rey |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2016 22:59 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 19:08 |
References: | Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2):93–115. Anselin, L. and Rey, S. J. (2014). Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press. Aroca, P., Bosch, M., and Maloney, W. F. (2005). Spatial dimensions of trade liberalization and economic convergence: Mexico 1985–2002. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(3):345–378. Beenstock, M. and Felsenstein, D. (2007). Mobility and mean reversion in the dynamics of regional inequality. International Regional Science Review, 30(4):335–361. Bigman, D. and Srinivasan, P. (2002). Geographical targeting of poverty alleviation programs: methodology and applications in rural India. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24(3):237–255. Bourguignon, F. (2011). Non-anonymous growth incidence curves, income mobility and social welfare dominance. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(4):605–627. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., and Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. Chung, S. and Hewings, G. J. (2015). Competitive and complementary relationship between regional economies: a study of the Great Lake States. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(2):205–229. Cramer, C. (2003). Does inequality cause conflict? Journal of International Development, 15(4):397–412. Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. (2012). The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5):1055–1085. Cuadrado-Roura, J. R. (2009). Regional policy, economic growth and convergence: lessons from the Spanish case. Springer Verlag. Esquivel, G. (1999). Convergencia regional en México, 1940-1995. El trimestre económico, (264):725. Fields, G. (2010). Does income mobility equalize longer-term incomes? New measures of an old concept. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(4):409–427. Formby, J., Smith, W., and Zheng, B. (2004). Mobility measurement, transition matrices and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics, 120(1):181–205. Hammond, G. W. and Thompson, E. (2006). Convergence and mobility: Personal income trends in US metropolitan and nonmetropolitan regions. International Regional Science Review, 29(1):35–63. Jalan, J. and Ravallion, M. (1998). Are there dynamic gains from a poor-area development program? Journal of Public Economics, 67(1):65–85. Kanbur, S. and Venables, A. (2005). Spatial inequality and development. Oxford University Press, USA. Kendall, M. G. (1962). Rank correlation methods. Griffin, London, 3rd edition. Le Gallo, J. (2004). Space-time analysis of GDP disparities across European regions: a Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review, 27(2):138–163. LeSage, J. and Reed, J. (1990). Testing criteria for determining leading regions in wage transmission models testing criteria for determining leading regions in wage transmission models testing 22 criteria for determining leading regions in wage transmission models. Journal of Regional Science, 30(1):37–50. Maasoumi, E. (1998). On mobility. Handbook of applied economic statistics, pages 119–175. Maasoumi, E., Racine, J., and Stengos, T. (2007). Growth and convergence: A profile of distribution dynamics and mobility. Journal of Econometrics, 136(2):483–508. Magrini, S. (1999). The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(2):257–281. Nelson, T., Wilson, H., Boots, B., and Wulder, M. (2005). Use of ordinal conversion for radiometric normalization and change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(3):535–541. Partridge, M. D. (1997). Is inequality harmful for growth? Comment. The American Economic Review, pages 1019–1032. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Harvard University Press. Quah, D. T. (1996a). Empirics for economic growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6):1353–1375. Quah, D. T. (1996b). Twin peaks: Growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. The Economic Journal, 106:1045–1055. Rey, S. J. (2001). Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 33(3):195–214. Rey, S. J. (2004). Spatial analysis of regional income inequality. In Goodchild, M. and Janelle, D., editors, Spatially Integrated Social Science: Examples in Best Practice, pages 280–299. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Rey, S. J. (2014). Fast algorithms for a space-time concordance measure. Computational Statistics, 29(3-4):799–811. Rey, S. J. (2016). Bells in space: The spatial dynamics of US interpersonal and interregional income inequality. International Regional Science Review, doi:10.1177/0160017615614899. 23 Rey, S. J. and Anselin, L. (2007). PySAL: A Python library of spatial analytical methods. The Review of Regional Studies, 37(1):5–27. Rey, S. J. and Montouri, B. D. (1999). U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 33(2):145–156. Rey, S. J. and Sastré-Gutiérrez, M. L. (2010). Interregional inequality dynamics in Mexico. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(3):277–298. Schluter, C. (1998). Statistical inference with mobility indices. Economics letters, 59(2):157–162. Schorrocks, A. (1978). Income inequality and income mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 19:376– 393. Shorrocks, A. and Wan, G. (2005). Spatial decomposition of inequality. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(1):59–81. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality. Penguin UK. The Economist (2011). Regional inequlity: The gap between many rich and poor regions widened because of the recession. http://www.economist.com/node/18332880?story_id=18332880. Webber, D., White, P., and Allen, D. (2005). Income convergence across US States: An analysis using measures of concordance and discordance. Journal of Regional Science, 45(3):565–589. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69480 |