Tsoulfidis, Lefteris (2010): Economic Theory in Historical Perspective. Published in: Journal of Economic Analysis , Vol. 2, No. 1 (2011): pp. 32-45.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70004.pdf Download (294kB) | Preview |
Abstract
On the methodological plain, this paper outlines the conditions that contribute to the development of economic theories and it continues with an examination of the concrete circumstances that gave rise to modern neoclassical macroeconomic theories. The paper further claims that the current impasse in macroeconomics is indicative of the need for new directions in economic theory which becomes imperative in the long economic downturn that started in 2007 and concludes by suggesting the need for a synthesis between the classical analysis and the theory of effective demand.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economic Theory in Historical Perspective |
English Title: | Economic Theory in Historical Perspective |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | classical approach, neoclassical theory, theory of value, effective demand, paradigm change. |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 70004 |
Depositing User: | Lefteris Tsoulfidis |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2016 14:54 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 16:03 |
References: | Ankarloo, D. and Palermo, G. (2004), Anti-Williamson: a Marxian Critique of New Institutional Economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, 413-429. Arestis, P. (2009), New Consensus Macroeconomics and Keynesian Critique. Mimeo. New York: Levy Institute. Εatwell, J. (1981), Competition, in Bradley, I and Howard, M. (eds.) Classical and Marxian Political Economy: Essays in Memory of Ronald Meek. London: Macmillan. Εatwell, J. (1983), Theories of Value, Output and Employment, in Eatwell and Milgate (eds.) Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution. New York: Oxford University Press. Blaug, M. (1983), Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chandler, A. (1977), The Visible Hand. Cambridge Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Clark, J. B. (1908), The Distribution of Wealth. A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. London: MacMillan. Garegnani, P. (1976), On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution. In Brown M., Sato K and Zarembka P. (eds.) Essays in Modern Capital Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland. Heilbroner, R. (1983), The Problem of Value in the Constitution of Economic Thought. Social Research 50, 253-277. Hollander, S. (1985), On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and Neoclassical Conceptions of Economic Organization: The French Connection in British Classicism. In Caravale, G. (ed.) The Legacy of Ricardo. New York: Basil Blackwell. Hollander, S. (1989), On P. Mirowski’s “Physics and the Marginal Revolution”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 13, 459-70. Hunt, S. (2000), A General Theory of Competition, Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth, London: Sage Publications. Hunt, E. (1992), History of Economic Thought. New York: Harper & Collins. Kalecki, M. (1939), Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. London: Allen and Unwin. Kurz, H. and Salvadori, N. (1995), Theory of Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mariolis, T. and Tsoulfidis, L. (2009), Decomposing the Changes in Production Prices into “Capital-Intensity” and “Price” Effects: Theory and Evidence from the Chinese Economy, Contributions to Political Economy 28, 1-22. Marshall, A. (1969 [1890]), Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan (8th Edition, 1969). Μarx, K. (1967, [1867-94]), Capital 3 vols, New York, International Publishers, 1967. Mill, J. S. (1976 [1848]), Principles of Political Economy. Fairfield, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley. Mirowski, P. (1984), Physics and the Marshallian Revolution, Cambridge Journal of Economics 8, 361-79. Prescott, E. (1986), Theory Ahead of Business Cycles Measurement, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review 10, 9-21. Rubin, I. (1979 [1928]), A History of Economic Thought. London: Ink Links. Samuelson, P. (1988), What would Keynes have Thought of Rational Expectations? Comments on Axel Leijonhfvud. Collected Scientific Papers of Paul Samuelson, vol. 5, 291-300. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Shaikh, A. (1980), Marxian Competition versus Perfect Competition: Further Comments on the So-called Choice of Technique, Cambridge Journal of Economics 4, 75-83. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Schumpeter, J. (1954), History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Tsoulfidis, L. (2008), Price–value deviations: further evidence from input–output data of Japan. International Review of Applied Economics, 22, 707–724. Tsoulfidis, L. (2010), Competing Schools of Economic Thought. Heidelberg: Springer. Tsoulfidis, L. (2011), Classical vs. Neoclassical Conceptions of Competition. Discussion Paper, 11/2011, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70004 |