Sokolovska, Olena (2016): Unilateral tariff cuts: a theory. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70493.pdf Download (261kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In order to analyze the Ukraine-EU trade arrangement in the context of modern theory of non-reciprocal trade agreements we provide brief examination of some theoretical approaches and practical implications of unilateral tariff preference schemes and examine current situation with tariff regulation in Ukraine-EU commodity trade. We found that unilateral tariff reduction or elimination under these schemes could lead either to trade creation or trade diversion, depending firstly form the presence of market power of beneficiary country. The obtained results could be used for further estimation of impact of non-reciprocal reduction of tariffs by EU governments on Ukrainian export flows
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Unilateral tariff cuts: a theory |
English Title: | Unilateral tariff cuts: a theory |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | tariff preferences, trade policy, unilateral trade liberalization |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General |
Item ID: | 70493 |
Depositing User: | Olena Sokolovska |
Date Deposited: | 06 Apr 2016 14:55 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 06:12 |
References: | 1. Akin C., A. Cengis, A. Basak The impact of economic freedom upon eco-nomic growth: an application on different income groups. Asian Economic and Financial Review. 2014. 4(8). 1024-1039. 2. Borrmann A., C. Borrmann, M. Stegger. The EC's Generalized System of Preferences. BRILL, 1981. 3. Candau F., J. Sébastien What Are EU Trade Preferences Worth for Sub-Saharan Africa and Other Developing Countries? CEPII. No 2005. 19 (December). 4. François J., B. Hoekman, M. Manchin. Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization. The World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. 2005. dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3730. 5. Fugazza M., A. Nicita Measuring preferential market access. MPRA Paper No. 38565. 2011. 6. Gamberoni E. Do unilateral trade preferences help export diversification? HEI Working Paper No.17/2007. 2007. HEI Graduate Institute of International Studies. 7. Generalized System of Preferences. List of Beneficiaries. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.62/Rev.6 UNCTAD, 2015. 8. Grossman G., A. Sykes A preference for development: the law and economics of GSP. World Trade Review. 2005. 4:1. 41-67. 9. Herz B., M. Wagner. The Dark Side of the Generalized System of Prefer-ences. Review of International Economics. 2011. 19. 4. 763-775. 10. Hoekman B., M. William, P. Braga. Quantifying the Value of Preferences and Potential Erosion Losses. Ch. 1, In: Trade Preferences Erosion Measurement and Policy Responses. The World Bank, 2008. 11. Jones V. Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate. Congressional Research Service. 2015. RL33663. 12. Jones V., J. Hornbeck, A. Villarreal Trade Preferences: Economic Issues and Policy Options. Congressional Research Service. 2013. R41429. 13. Ketterer T., Bernhofen, M. Chris. Trade Preferences and Multilateral Tariff Cuts: Evidence for Japan. Journal of Japanese and International Economies. 2015. 38. 31-51. 14. Krueger A. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review. 1974. 64(3). 291-303. 15. Laird S. A Review of Trade Preference Schemes for the World’s Poorest Countries. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). 2012. Issue Paper 25. 16. Low P., R. Piermartini, J. Richtering. Non-Reciprocal Preference Erosion Arising From MFN Liberalization in Agriculture: What Are the Risks? Economic Research and Statistics Division. World Trade Organization, 2006. 17. Onguglo B. Developing countries and unilateral trade preferences in the new international trading system. Ch. 4. In: Trade Rules in the Making: Challenges in Regional and Multilateral Negotiations (ed. by M. Mendoza, P. Low and B. Kotschwar. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press/Organization of American States, 1999. 18. Ozden C., E. Reinhardt. The Perversity of Preferences: GSP and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976–2000. Journal of Development Economics. 2005. 78. 1. 1-21. 19. Practical guide to the new GSP trade regimes for developing countries. European Commission, 2013. 20. Revised EU trade scheme to help developing countries applies on 1 January 2014. European Commission, 2013. 21. Rivera L., P. Romer Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1999. 106(2). 531-555. 22. Snyder M. GSP and Development: Increasing the Effectiveness of Nonreciprocal Preferences. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2012. 33. 4. 821-861. 23. The EU’s Generalized Scheme of Preferences (GSP). European Commis-sion, 2015. 24. The European Union’s Generalised System of Preferences (GSP). European Commission, 2004. 25. Wall D. Problems with Preferences. International Affairs. 1971. 47. 87-99. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70493 |