Labson, Stephen (2016): Asset Valuation and the Fascination with Efficiency. Published in: Network , Vol. Dec, No. Issue 61 (December 2016): pp. 1-7.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70667.pdf Download (301kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Asset valuation typically plays an important role in determination of regulated tariffs, and accordingly the methodology employed in valuation of such assets provides a rich source of academic analysis and applied case study. The topic of asset valuation is made more interesting given the range of valuation methodologies to choose from - that the choice of methodology often has a significant impact on deemed prices – and that there is not a professional consensus or standard in which to guide practitioners needing to determine cost based prices or tariffs. Further motivated by the June 2015 judgment in the matter between Sasol Chemical Industries Ltd and the Competition Commission (Competition Appeal Court of South Africa, the Honourable JP Davis) we review competing asset valuation methodologies within the context of economic value, optimality, price signalling, investment incentives, and subsidy – and in doing so identify some common myths and misconceptions gleaned from this case, and in regulatory decisions where tariffs are determined based on the cost of supply of a notional efficient operator.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Asset Valuation and the Fascination with Efficiency |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Asset valuation, excessive pricing, economic value, competitive equilibria, contestable markets,. |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law |
Item ID: | 70667 |
Depositing User: | Dr B Stephen Labson |
Date Deposited: | 13 Feb 2018 19:54 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2019 07:40 |
References: | ACCC (1996) National Electricity Market Network Pricing Forum, 11 July. 1996 Albon, R (2007) ‘The Use and Abuse of the Efficient Components Pricing Rule’, Network, Issue 25, September, pp. 2-7 Baumol, WJ, JC Panzar, and RD Willig, Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982 Clark, J. M. (1940) ‘Toward a Concept of Workable Competition.’The American Economic Review 30.2 p: 241-56. Debreu, G (1959) Theory of Value An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, Yale University Press. Debreu G (1983) ‘Economic Theory In The Mathematical Mode, Nobel Memorial Lecture,’ published in Economic Sciences (p 93). Foer, A (2015) ‘On the Inefficiencies of Efficiency as the Single-minded Goal of Antitrust’, The Antitrust Bulletin, 60(2), pp. 103-127. Gewirtz, P (1996) ‘On “I Know It When I See It”’. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1706 Gleeson, J (2005) ‘Administrative Law Meets The Regulatory Agencies: Tournament Of The Incompatible?’ AIAL FORUM No. 46, pp. 28-38. Houston, G and H Green (2009) Asset Values in Workably Competitive Markets A Report Prepared on Behalf of Orion New Zealand Ltd. Independent Committee of Inquiry (1993), Report on the Inquiry into a National Competition Policy, AGPS, Canberra. Johnstone, D (2002) ‘Replacement Cost Asset Valuation and the Regulation of Energy Infrastructure Tariffs Theory and Practice in Australia' CRI International Lipsey, RG and K Lancaster (1956) ‘The General Theory of Second Best’, Review of Economic Studies 24(1), pp. 11–32. Lorenz, E (1963) ‘Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow’, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, pp. 130-141. Marshall, A, ‘Principles of Economics,’ 3rd Edition 1895. http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marPtoc.html National Competition Council (1997) Compendium of National Competition Policy Agreements, Commonwealth of Australia National Competition Council (2011) A Guide to the Functions and Powers of the National Competition Council under the National Gas Law. Melbourne Nicholas, P. (2008) ‘Administrative Law In The Energy Sector Accountability, Complexity and Current Developments’ AIAL Forum. No 59 p 73 – 92. Perloff, JM (2011) Microeconomics, sixth edition, Addison-Wesley. Shogren, R (2004) ‘Dynamic Efficiencies and Workable/Effective Competition – Comments on a Paper by William G. Shepherd’ ACCC Regulatory Conference, Gold Coast, Australia South Australian Hansard (2008) Legislative Assembly. Steering Committee (1994) Guidelines On Accounting Policy For Valuation Of Assets Of Government Trading Enterprises Using Current Valuation Methods, AGPS van Geert, P (2008) The Dynamic Systems Approach in the Study of L1 and L2 Acquisition: An Introduction, in Modern Language Journal 92(2):179 - 1999 Willig, R.D. (1976) ‘Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology’, The American Economic Review, Vol 66, No 4 p 589-597 Yarrow, G, M Cave, M Pollitt, and J Small (2010) Asset Valuation in Workably Competitive Markets: A Report to the New Zealand Commerce Commission |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70667 |