The Asset Management Industry and Systemic Risk: Is There a Connection?

Lopez, Claude and Markwardt, Donald and Savard, Keith (2016): The Asset Management Industry and Systemic Risk: Is There a Connection?

Abstract

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, new legislation and regulation have pressured banks (and insurances) to reduce their size, leverage, and riskier lines of business in order to avoid another too-big-to-fail debacle. Nonbank financial intermediaries have naturally taken up some of that slack and, not surprisingly, regulatory scrutiny has turned toward these intermediaries to evaluate whether they could pose similar risks to financial stability that banks did pre-crisis. Owing to their stunning growth in the past decade, focus among nonbank intermediaries is now centering on asset managers, which include firms offering mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, hedge funds and private equity funds. This report explores whether there is a demonstrable link between the asset management industry and systemic risk. Key points:

- Systemic risk is distinct from run-of-the-mill financial or operational risk, an important difference when determining whether the sector poses a risk to the broader financial system with the potential for negative spillovers into the real economy.

- Because asset managers do not take on nearly the same level of leverage and do not guarantee balances on customer accounts as banks do with deposits, it is unlikely that the industry is the epicenter of (or creating) systemic risk in the financial system. Theoretically, however, they hold the potential transmit or amplify systemic risk in the system based on unique risk factors such as herding and liquidity mismatches.

- One major regulatory concern is the mismatch between asset management firms offering investors highly liquid investment terms for funds investing in highly illiquid assets, which could create fire sale scenarios that negatively impact financial markets. A close look at the role of high-yield debt markets suggests that major disruptions to the sector’s funding environment could have a significant impact on the real economy. However, even during periods of acute investor outflows, high-yield mutual funds have managed liquidity risk effectively to-date, and high-yield ETFs have actually been a supplemental liquidity source for institutional investors.

- In a post-crisis world, regulators have as much power (if not more) than financial firms’ shareholders. Considerations must include:

i. The dynamic relationship between financial regulation and financial activity ii. The necessity of proper fiscal and monetary policies to complement prudential oversight iii. The reality that financial markets are connected globally.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: systemic risk, asset managers, macroprudential policy, financial stability
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services

References

Delbecque, Bernard (2012), Key Functions of Asset Management, VOXEU, March.

Feroli, Michael, Anil K. Kashyap, Kermit Schoenholtz and Hyun Song Shin (2014), Market Tantrums and Monetary Policy, The Initiative on Global Markets, Working Paper No. 101, February.

Financial Stability Board (2016), Proposed Policy Recommendations to Address Structural Vulnerabilities from Asset Management Activities, June.

Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), Update on review of Asset Management Products and Activities, April.

Frankel, Jeffrey A. (2016), International Coordination, NBER Working Paper 21878.

Goldstein, Itay, Hao Jiang and David T. Ng (2016), Investor Flows and Fragility in Corporate Bond Funds, Wharton working paper May.

International Monetary Fund (2015), Global financial Stability Report.

Jones, Bradley (2015), Asset Bubbles: Re-thinking Policy for the Age of Asset Management, IMF Working Paper No. 15/27.

Lopez, Claude, Donald Markwardt and Keith Savard (2015a), Macroprudential Policy: A Silver Bullet or Refighting the Last War, MI report, July.

Lopez, Claude, Donald Markwardt and Keith Savard (2015b), Macroprudential Policy: What Does it Really Mean, Banking and Financial Services, 34 (10) 1-10, October.

Manconi, Albert, Massimo Massa and Ayako Yasuda (2012), The Role of Institutional Investors in Propagating the Crisis of 2007-2008, Journal of Financial Economics 104(3): 491-518, June.

Maug, Ernst and Narayanan Naik (2011), Herding and Delegated Portfolio Management: The Impact of Relative Performance Evaluation on Asset Allocation, Quarterly Journal of Finance 1(2): 265-292.

McCollum, Andrew (2016), Institutional Investment in ETFs: Versatility Fuels Growth, Greenwich Associates report.

Ramaswamy, Srichander (2011), Market Structures and Systemic Risk of Exchange-Traded Funds, BIS Working Paper No 343.

Reinhart, Carmen M. and Kenneth S. Rogoff (2009), The Aftermath of Financial Crises, American Economic Review, 99(2) 466-72.

Roncalli, Thierry and Guillaume Weisang (2015), Asset Management and Systemic Risk, Working paper, December.

Shin, Hyun Song, and Kwanho Shin (2011), Procyclicality and Monetary Aggregates,” NBER working paper 16836.

Shinasi, Garry J. (2004), Defining Financial Stability, IMF Working Paper No. 04/187, October.

Wagner, Wolf (2010), Diversification at Financial Institutions and Systemic Crises, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(3) 373-386.