Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Beladi, Hamid (2013): Ship inspections in invasive species management: Alternate regimes and their properties. Published in: Theoretical Economics Letters , Vol. 3, (26 August 2013): pp. 1-5.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72269.pdf Download (159kB) | Preview |
Abstract
When it comes to inspections in invasive species management, the literature has shown that there is frequently a tension between economic cost reduction and inspection stringency. As such, we analyze the properties of two probabilistic inspection regimes that are designed to screen arriving ships in a seaport for the presence of one or more deleterious invasive species. In the first regime, the seaport inspector screens arriving ships by using fast (less stringent) and slow (more stringent) protocols. In the second regime, the inspector uses a uniformly stringent protocol with stages. We use the theory of continuous time Markov chains (CTMCs) to delineate both inspection regimes. Next, we derive some key long run performance measures associated with each of these two regimes. Finally, we discuss the implications of our analysis for practical invasive species management.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Ship inspections in invasive species management: Alternate regimes and their properties |
English Title: | Ship inspections in invasive species management: Alternate regimes and their properties |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Inspection, Invasive Species, Management, Performance Measure, Uncertainty |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q27 - Issues in International Trade Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 72269 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Amitrajeet Batabyal |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jun 2016 21:38 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 12:13 |
References: | H.A. Ameden, S.B. Cash, and D. Zilberman. “Border enforcement and firm response in the management of invasive species,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 35-46. A.A. Batabyal. “A theoretical note on the optimal dependability and speed of container inspections in invasive species management,” Studies in Regional Science, Vol. 38, 2008, pp. 199-204. A.A. Batabyal. “An analysis of inspections when economic cost reduction matters more than biological invasion damage control,” in A.A. Batabyal, Dynamic and Stochastic Resource Economics. Forthcoming, World Scientific Publishing. A.A. Batabyal and H. Beladi. “International trade and biological invasions: A queuing theoretic analysis of the prevention problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 170, 2006, pp. 758-770. A.A. Batabyal and P. Nijkamp. “On container versus time based inspection policies in invasive species management,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 340-347. A.A. Batabyal and S.J. Yoo. “A theoretical analysis of random inspections and fines in invasive species management,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 17, 2008, pp. 1-9. A.A. Batabyal, H. Beladi, and W.W. Koo. “Maritime trade, biological invasions, and the properties of alternate inspection regimes,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 184-190. G.J. DeAngelo, A.A. Batabyal, and S. Kumar. “On economic cost minimization versus biological invasion damage control,” in A. Oude Lansink, (Ed.), New Approaches to the Economics of Plant Health, 2006, pp. 23-37. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. G.J. DeAngelo, A.A. Batabyal, and S. Kumar. “An analysis of economic cost minimization and biological invasion damage control using the AWQ criterion,” Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 639-655. C. McAusland and C. Costello. “Avoiding invasives: Trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 48, 2004, pp. 954-977. P.R. Merel and C.A. Carter. “A second look at managing import risk from invasive species,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 56, 2008, pp. 286-290. S.M. Ross. Stochastic Processes, 2nd edition, 1996. Wiley, New York, New York. J.N. Sanchirico, H.J. Albers, C. Fischer, and C. Coleman. “Spatial management of invasive species: Pathways and policy options,” Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 45, 2010, pp. 517-535. H.C. Tijms. A First Course in Stochastic Models, 2003. Wiley, Chichester, UK. USDA, APHIS, and USFS. “Pest Risk Assessment for Importation of Solid Wood Packing Materials into the United States,” 2000, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/pra/swpm/complete.pdf Z. Yang and A.N. Perakis. “Multiattribute decision analysis of mandatory ballast water treatment measures in the US great lakes,” Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 81-86. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72269 |