A Spatial Production Economy Explains Zipf’s Law for Gross Metropolitan Product

Watanabe, Hiroki (2015): A Spatial Production Economy Explains Zipf’s Law for Gross Metropolitan Product.

Abstract

This paper provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of the distribution of GDP at city level (henceforth referred to as gross metropolitan product, GMP) with the aim of bridging the gap betwen the literature on agglomeration economies and the city-size distribution. We show that 1) it shares the same characteristics to the city-size counterpart: They are both fat-tailed, and 2) a 1% increase in employment leads to a 1.117% (or 1.180% in theory) increase in GMP. Free mobility of household forces a city to operate at the size where scale economies are present, or else, the city cannot offset the reduced housing consumption and increased congestion due to crowding set off by agglomeration economies, and loses its population and GMP to elsewhere. We establish a production economy model to break down the interplay above and derive the equilibrium GMP distribution, which tests well with the US data on GMP.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Zipf’s Law, Gibrat’s Law, GDP by City, Production Economy
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D51 - Exchange and Production Economies; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity

References

Fredrik Andersson, Simon Burgess, and Julia I Lane, Cities, matching and the productivity gains of agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics 61 (2007), no. 1, 112–128.

William Alonso, Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent, Harvard University Press, 1964.

Marcus Berliant and Masahisa Fujita, Alonso’s discrete population model of land use: Efficient allocations and competitive equilibria, International Economic Review (1992), 535–566.

Marcus Berliant and Hideo Konishi, The endogenous formation of a city: Population agglomeration and marketplaces in a location-specific production economy, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30 (2000), no. 3, 289– 324.

Jan K Brueckner, The structure of urban equilibria: A unified treatment of the Muth-Mills model, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 2 (1987), 821–845.

Marcus Berliant, Robert R Reed, and Ping Wang, Knowledge exchange, matching, and agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics 60 (2006), no. 1, 69–95.

Marcus Berliant and Ping Wang, Endogenous formation of a city without agglomerative externalities or market imperfections: Marketplaces in a regional economy, Regional Science and Urban Economics 23 (1993), no. 1, 121–144.

Gerald A Carlino, Increasing returns to scale in metropolitan manufacturing, Journal of Regional Science 19 (1979), no. 3, 363–372.

Gerald A Carlino, Productivity in cities: Does city size matter?, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review (1987), 3–12.

Lorenzo Caliendo, Fernando Parro, Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, and Pierre-Daniel Sarte, The impact of regional and sectoral productivity changes on the US economy, Tech. report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014.

Federico Cingano and Fabiano Schivardi, Identifying the sources of local productivity growth, Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2004), no. 4, 720–742.

Gilles Duranton and Diego Puga, Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, Handbook of regional and urban economics 4 (2004), 2063–2117.

Gilles Duranton, Urban evolutions: The fast, the slow, and the still, The American Economic Review (2007), 197–221.

Jan Eeckhout, Gibrat’s law for (all) cities, American Economic Review (2004), 1429–1451.

Glenn Ellison and Edward L Glaeser, Geographic concentration in us manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach, Tech. report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994.

Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman, and Anthony J. Venables, The spatial economy, The MIT Press, 1999.

Shota Fujishima, Evolutionary implementation of optimal city size distributions, Regional Science and Urban Economics 43 (2013), no. 2, 404–410.

Xavier Gabaix, Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1999), 739–767.

Xavier Gabaix and Yannis M Ioannides, The evolution of city size distributions, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4 (2004), 2341– 2378.

Kristian Giesen, Arndt Zimmermann, and Jens Suedekum, The size distribution across all cities – double Pareto lognormal strikes, Journal of Urban Economics 68 (2010), no. 2, 129–137.

J Vernon Henderson, Efficiency of resource usage and city size, Journal of Urban economics 19 (1986), no. 1, 47–70.

J Vernon Henderson, Marshall’s scale economies, Journal of Urban Economics 53 (2003), no. 1, 1–28.

Yannis M Ioannides and Henry G Overman, Zipfs law for cities: an empirical examination, Regional Science and Urban Economics 33 (2003), no. 2, 127–137.

Sukkoo Kim, Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: The trends in US regional manufacturing structure, 1860- 1987, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1995), 881–908.

Paul Krugman, Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99 (1991), no. 3, 483–499.

Eckhard Limpert, Werner A Stahel, and Markus Abbt, Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues, BioScience 51 (2001), no. 5, 341–352.

Patricia C Melo, Daniel J Graham, and Robert B Noland, A metaanalysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies, Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (2009), no. 3, 332–342.

Giordano Mion and Paolo Naticchioni, Urbanization externalities, market potential and spatial sorting of skills and firms, CEPR Discussion Papers (2005).

Enrico Moretti, Human capital externalities in cities, Handbook of regional and urban economics 4 (2004), 2243–2291.

Francisco L Rivera-Batiz, Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production, Regional Science and Urban Economics 18 (1988), no. 1, 125–153.

Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and Mark LJ Wright, Urban structure and growth, The Review of Economic Studies 74 (2007), no. 2, 597–624.

David Segal, Are there returns to scale in city size?, The Review of Economics and Statistics (1976), 339–350.

Daniel Shefer, Localization economies in SMSA’s: A production function analysis, Journal of Regional Science 13 (1973), no. 1, 55–64.

Kwok Tong Soo, Zipf’s law for cities: A cross-country investigation, Regional science and urban Economics 35 (2005), no. 3, 239–263.

Joseph A Swanson, Kenneth R Smith, and Jeffrey G Williamson, The size distribution of cities and optimal city size, Journal of Urban Economics 1 (1974), no. 4, 395–409.

David Starrett, Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility, Journal of Economic Theory 17 (1978), no. 1, 21–37.

Seoung Hwan Suh, The optimal size distribution of cities, Journal of Urban Economics 30 (1991), no. 2, 182–191.

Leo Sveikauskas, The productivity of cities, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1975), 393–413.

Takatoshi Tabuchi, Optimal distribution of city sizes in a region, Environment and Planning A 14 (1982), no. 1, 21–32.

Geoffrey S Watson, Smooth regression analysis, Sankhya: The Indian ¯ Journal of Statistics, Series A (1964), 359–372.