Santos, Antonio Bob and Mendonca, Sandro (2016): A Delphi Approach to Boost an Open Innovation Policy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73007.pdf Download (378kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this research paper we intend to find out whether open innovation approach may be a valid approach to the definition of innovation policy. To that, we use a method applied in various fields of study, including public policy and open innovation studies: the Delphi method. After the introduction (Section 1), we describe the Delphi method (Section 2) and the methodology used in this research (Section 3). The results of the application of the Delphi method are presented in Section 4, where we identify public policy priorities in an open innovation perspective. Then, we propose measures of public policy through which these priorities could be achieved (Section 5). Section 6 presents the main findings, concluding that the approach of open innovation may be considered for prioritization of innovation policy and policy measures.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Delphi Approach to Boost an Open Innovation Policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | open innovation, innovation policy, public policy, Delphi |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 73007 |
Depositing User: | Antonio Bob Santos |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2016 09:27 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:31 |
References: | Adler, M. and E. Ziglio (1996), Gazing Into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Kingsley Publishers. Baldwin, C. and E. von Hippel (2011), Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation, Organization Science 22(6), 1399-1417. Barroca, A., G. Meireles and C. Neto (2015), A Empregabilidade dos Doutorados nas Empresas Portuguesas. Porto: Advancis Business Services. Borrás, S. and C. Edquist (2013), The choice of innovation policy instruments, Paper nº 2013/04, CIRCLE, Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy, Lund University. Brown Jr., A., L. Rusin and H. Rakouth (2010), Open Innovation: An Automotive Supplier's Perspective, Society of Automotive Engineers technical paper series 2010-01-2340, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2340. Bruening, T., D. Scalon, T. Hoover, C. Hodes, X. Shao, P. Dhital et al. (2002), Attributes and Characteristics of Exemplary, Leading, and Innovative Career and Technical Education Teacher Preparation Programs. National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, University of Minnesota, http://tinyurl.com/qfeztbo. Carayannis, E. (2013), Innovation diplomacy as driver of democracy, innovation and development: The case of Greece, in Carayannis, E. e G. Korres (Eds.), The Innovation Union in Europe: A Socio-Economic Perspective on EU Integration, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 123-143. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. and M. Bogers (2014), Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation, in Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-28. Chesbrough, H. and R. Ghafele (2014), Open innovation and intellectual property: A two-sided market perspective, in Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke e J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191-207. De Jong, J.P.J., T. Kalvet and W. Vanhaverbeke (2010), Exploring a theoretical framework to structure the public policy implications of open innovation, Technology Analysis an Strategic Management 22(8), 887-896. Donohoe, H., M. Stellefson and B. Tennant (2012), Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers, American Journal of Health Education 43(1), 38-46. Edquist, C. (2014), Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries — but linearity still prevails!, STI Policy Review 5(2), 1-19. European Commission (2016), Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015. European Commission. Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra and M. Laranja (2011), Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation, Research Policy 40(5), 702-713. Geist, M. R. (2010), Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies, Evaluation and Program Planning 33(2), 147-154. Giannarou, L. and E. Zervas (2014), Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice, International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management 9(2), 65-82. Godinho, M.M. (2013), A Inovação em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Goula, A. (2013), The Organizational Culture of Public Hospital: Factors of Transition from the Bureaucratic to a New Model of Management (in Greek). PhD Thesis, Panteion University of Political and Social Sciences. Havas, A., K. Izsak, P. Markianidou and S. Radošević (2015), Comparative analysis of policy-mixes of research and innovation policies in Central and Eastern European countries, GRINCOH Working Paper 3(12). Heitor, M, H. Horta and J. Mendonça (2014), Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82, 6-22. Henriques, L. (coord.) (2013), Diagnóstico do Sistema de Investigação e Inovação: Desafios, Forças e Fraquezas rumo e 2020. Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Ministério da Educação e Ciência. Howlett, M. e J. Rayner (2007), Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’, Policy and Society 26(4), 1-18. Hsu, C.-C. and B. Sandford (2007), The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12(10), 1-8. Ku Fan, C., and C. Cheng (2006), A study to identify the training needs of life insurance sales representatives in Taiwan using the Delphi approach, International Journal of Training and Development 10(3), 212-226. Lee, C., and B. King (2009), A determination of destination competitiveness for Taiwan’s hot springs tourism sector using the Delphi technique, Journal of Vacation Marketing 15(3), 243-257. Linstone, H.A. and M. Turoff (1975), The Delphi Method. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Mason, K. J., and F. Alamdari (2007), EU network carriers, low cost carriers and consumer behavior: A Delphi study of future trends, Journal of Air Transport Management 13(5), 299-310. Mateus, A., Sociedade de Consultores & Associados (2015), Avaliação ex ante dos Instrumentos Financeiros de Programas do Portugal 2020: Lote 1 — Instrumentos Financeiros para o apoio direto às empresas — Relatório Final. Lisboa: Agência para o Desenvolvimento e Coesão, I.P. Mazzucato, M. (2013), The Entrepreneurial State — Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London, UK e New York, USA: Anthem Press. Mazzucato, M. and C. Penna (2015), Mission-Oriented Finance for Innovation — New Ideas for Investment-led Growth. London: Policy Network and Rowman & Littlefield International. Mendonça, S. (2001), Socio-tecnologia e cenarização: O caso da Shell", in Godinho, M.M., A.S. Ferreira and J.Z. Mendes (Eds.), Como Está a Economia Portuguesa?, Livro de Actas da IV conferência sobre economia portuguesa, Lisboa: CISEP, Europress, 913-924. Nelson, R. R. and B.N. Sampat (2001), Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 44(1), 31-54. Piller, F. and J. West (2014), Firms, users, and innovation: An interactive model of coupled open innovation, in Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke e J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-49. Santos, A.B. (2015), Open Innovation research: trends and influences – a Bibliometric Analysis, Journal of Innovation Management 3(2), 131-165. Scapolo, F. and I. Miles (2004), Eliciting expert’s knowledge: A comparison of two methods, EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods, Seville, Spain, http://tinyurl.com/pomtcoy. Stitt-Gohdes, W. and T. Crews (2004), The Delphi technique: A research strategy for career and technical education, Journal of Career and Technical Education 20(2), http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JCTE/v20n2/stitt.html Szpilko, D. (2014), The use of Delphi method in the process of building a tourism development strategy in the region, Economics and Management 4/2014, http://tinyurl.com/q8nc5xv. Tornjanski,V., S. Marinković, M. L. Jakšić and V. B. Arsić (2015), The prioritization of open innovation determinants in banking, Industrija (43)3, 81-105. Valente, A.C. and Correia, I. (2015), Mapeamento da Oferta de Educação e Formação em TICE em Portugal. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian e Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. Wright, J. T. C. and R.A. Giovinazzo (2000), Delphi — uma ferramenta de apoio ao planejamento prospectivo, Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração 1(12), 54-65. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73007 |