Li, Cheng (2016): Morality and Value Neutrality in Economics: A Dualist View.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73797.pdf Download (504kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a dualist view that economics exhibits the properties of both moral science and value-neutral approach, regardless of the normative-positive distinction. Our argumentation is derived from the understanding that, analytically, economics is a rational choice theory, broadly defined. As implied by this claim, on the one hand, economics behaves as a moral science for two main reasons: all economic theories and policy discussions are necessarily based on some moral premises about means-end considerations; economics as a method of analysis can be and has been applied to explanations of a wide range of moral phenomena. On the other hand, since economists — without being informed of some ethical presuppositions of higher order — cannot deal with the comparisons among different value criteria, their approach remains neutral regarding judgmental positions, which should be given a priori to make economic enquiries possible. Ultimately, by this view we reconcile morality with value neutrality, without slicing the discipline into two branches.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Morality and Value Neutrality in Economics: A Dualist View |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Methodology; Rationality; Moral science; Value-neutral approach; Normative-positive distinction |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General |
Item ID: | 73797 |
Depositing User: | Cheng Li |
Date Deposited: | 19 Sep 2016 09:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 20:00 |
References: | Atkinson, A. B., 2011. The restoration of welfare economics. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 101 (3), 157-161. Backhouse, R.E., and Medema, S. G., 2009. Retrospectives: On the definition of economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (1), 221-233. Becker, G., 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Becker, G., 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Bhagwati, J., 2011. Markets and morality. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 101 (3), 162-165. Boulding, K., 1969. Economics as a moral science. American Economic Review 59 (1), 1-12. Buchanan, J., 1964. What should economists do? Southern Economic Journal 30 (3), 213-222. Coase, R., 1977. Economics and contiguous disciplines. The Journal of Legal Studies 7(2), 201-211. Colander, D., 2009. What was “It” that Robbins was defining? Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4), 437-48. Colander, D., and Su, H., 2015. Making sense of economists’ positive normative distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology 22(2), 157-170. Dupré, J., 2007. Fact and value, in Kincaid, H., Dupré, J., and Wylie, A. (eds.), Value-free Science? Ideals and Illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 27-41. Friedman, M., 1953. The methodology of positive economics, in Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 3-43. Friedman, B., 2011. Economics: A moral inquiry with religious origins. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 101 (3), 166-170. Hands, W., 2012, The positive-normative dichotomy and economics, in Mäki, U., Gabbay, D., Thagard, P., and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol.13, Philosophy of Economics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.219-239. Hausman, D., 2008. Introduction, in Hausman, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics, Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-38. Hausman, D. 2012. Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hirshleifer, J., 1985. The expanding domain of economics. American Economic Review 75 (6), 53-68. Hodgson, B., 2001. Economics as Moral Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Keynes, J. N., 1917. The Scope and Method of Political Economy, Macmillan and Co., Ltd. 4th edition, London. Kirzner, I.,1960. The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought, Sheed and Ward, Inc. Lazear, E., 2000, Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(1), 99-146. Mankiw, N.G., 2013, Defending the one percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(3), 21-34. Marshall, A., 1920 (2013), Principles of Economics, 8th Edition, London, Palgrave Macmillan. Pantaleoni, M., 1889. Pure Economics, Macmillan, London. Pigou, A.C., 1920. The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan Co. Limited, London. Piketty, T., 2013, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Popper, K. 1985. The rationality principle, in Miller, D.(ed.), Popper Selections, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 357-65. Posner, R.A., 2009, A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of ’08 and the Descent into Depression, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Putnam, H., 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Putnam, H., and Walsh, V., 2007. A response to Dasgupta. Economics and Philosophy 23 (3), 359-364. Putnam, H., and Walsh, V., 2009. Entanglement throughout economic science: The end of a separate welfare economics, Review of Political Economy 21 (2), 291-297. Raditzky, G., and Berholz, P., 1987. Economic Imperialism: The Economic Method Applied Outside the Field of Economics. Paragon, New York. Robbins, L., 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (second edition). Macmillan, London. Samuelson, P., 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Say, J-B., 1832, A Treatise on Political Economy. Grigg & Elliot, Philadephia. Scarantino, A., 2009. On the role of values in economic science: Robbins and his critics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4), 449-473. Schumpeter, J.A.1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Sen, A., 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4), 317-344. Sen, A., 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Shiller, R., and Shiller, V., 2011. Economists as worldly philosophers. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 101 (3), 171-175. Stigler, G. J., 1980. Economics or ethics? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University. Stigler, G. J., and Becker, G. S., 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67 (2), 76-90. Stiglitz, J.E., 2012, The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, W.W. Norton & Company, New York. Thaler, R., 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(1), 39-60. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59 (4), S251-S278. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73797 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Morality and Value Neutrality in Economics: A Dualist View. (deposited 17 Oct 2015 06:06)
- Morality and Value Neutrality in Economics: A Dualist View. (deposited 19 Sep 2016 09:11) [Currently Displayed]