Michaelides, Panayotis G. and Milios, John G. (2005): The Influence of the German Historical School on Schumpeter.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74471.pdf Download (237kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The present paper defends the thesis that Schumpeter formulated his research program and his main theses in accordance with the theoretical framework of the German Historical School, as expressed by major theoreticians such as Schmoller, Max Weber and Sombart. For instance, Schumpeter’s notion of development could be viewed in the context of the Schmollerian theoretical approach. Next, we compare, briefly, Schumpeter’s and Weber’s central visions emphasizing the role of the “entrepreneur”, the “circular flow” and the “protestant ethic” and the “spirit of capitalism” respectively. Finally, Schumpeter seems to follow Sombart in his “theoretical materialism”, and there is general agreement between the two theoreticians that capitalism was on the decline. However, the strongest parallels are to be found with respect to forces driving the process, at the end of which Schumpeter expected a socialist system, while Sombart expected a mixed economy. Also, several similarities can be found in their respective theses about the evolution of the capitalist enterprise and the role of technology. Τhe paper discusses, also, some of Schumpetr’s main differences of approach as to the German Historical School and concludes that the latter shall inspire further research and developments in Schumpeterian economics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Influence of the German Historical School on Schumpeter |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Schumpeter, German Historical School, influence |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals |
Item ID: | 74471 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. Panayotis G. Michaelides |
Date Deposited: | 23 Oct 2016 09:19 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:02 |
References: | Appel, M. (1992), Werner Sombart: Theoretiker und Historiker des modernen Kapitalismus, Marburg: Nmetropolis-Verlag. Backhouse, R. (1987), A History of Modern Economic Analysis, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Becker, M.C. and Knudsen, T. (2002): Schumpeter 1911: Farsighted Visions of Economic Development, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 387-403. Bendix, R. (1960), Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, New York: Doubleday. Carlin, E. (1956), Schumpeter’s Constructed Type-The Entrepreneur, Kyklos, IX, pp. 27-40. Chaloupek, G. (1995), Long Term Economic Perspectives Compared: Joseph Schumpeter and Werner Sombart, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2:1, Spring, pp. 127-149. Cramer, D. L. and Leathers, C. G. (1988), Schumpeter and Galbraith: A comparative Analysis on the Modern Corporate Economy, History of Economics Society Bulletin 10, (Spring), pp. 47-56. Ebner, A. (2000), Schumpeter and the ‘Schmollerprogramm’: integrating theory and history in the analysis of economic development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, pp. 355-372. Economakis, G. E. and Milios, J. (2001), Historical School, German, Encyclopedia of International Political Economy, London – New York: Routledge, vol. 2, pp. 686-687. Faltello, R. and Jovanovic, M. 1997. ‘Rudolf Hilferding und Das Finanzkapital’,(http://www.agmarxismus.net/vergrnr/m07_2hil.html), Haberler, G. (1950), Joseph Alois Schumpeter: 1883-1950, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, pp. 333-72. Krause, W. (1962), Werner Sombarts Weg von Kathedersozialismus zum Fachismus, Berlin: Ruetten and Loening.  Landreth, H. (1976), History of Economic Theory, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Landreth, H. and Colander, D. (1989), History of Economic Theory, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Lenin, V. I. (1893-1900), Collected Works [LCW], Volumes 1, 2, 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers 1977. List, F. (1856), National System of Political Economy, Philadelphia (translation by G.A.Matile). MacDonald, R. (1965), Schumpeter and Max Weber – Central Visions and Social Theories, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 79 (3), pp. 373-396. Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2005), Did Hilferding Influence Schumpeter?, History of Economics Review, Vol. 41, Winter, pp. 98-125. Milios, J. and Economakis, G. (2001), Historical School, German, Encyclopedia of International Economics, Vol. 2, Routledge Publishers, 2001, pp. 686-687. Oser, J. and Blanchfield, W. (1975), The Evolution of Economic Thought, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Priddat, B (1995), Werner Sombart's late economic thinking: back to physiocracy, in J.Backhaus (ed.), Werner Sombart Social Scientist, Vol. 2, Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag. Rubin, I. I. (1929), A History of Economic Thought. London: Pluto Press 1989. Samuelson, P. A. (1981), Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, in A. Heertje (ed.), Schumpeter’s Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy after 40 Years, New York: Praeger. Schmoller, G. von (1897), Wechselnde Theoriesn und festehende Wahrheiten im Gebiete der Staats – und Socialwissenschften und die heutige deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre, Berlin: W. Buexenstein. Schmoller, G. von (1901, 1904), Grundriss der allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre, 2 vols, Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot. Schmoller, G. von (1903), Werner Sombart, Der Moderne Kapitalismus, in B. vom Brocke (ed.) Sombart’s ‘Moderner Capitalismus’, Munich; Deutsher Taschenbuch-Verlag, pp. 135-46 [1987].  Schmoller, G. von (1911), ‘Volkswirtschaft, Volkswirtschaftlehre und – methode’, in J.Conrad et al (eds.), Handwoerterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, 3rd ed., vol 8, Jena: Gustav Fischer. Schumpeter, J. (1908), Das Wesen und Der Hauptinhalt der Theoretischen Nationalökonomie, Berlin: Duncker and Humblot. Schumpeter, J. (1924), Epochen der Dogmen und Methodengeschichte, in: Grundriss der Sozialoekonomik, Bd 1,2, Aufl. Mohr, Tübingen. Schumpeter, J. (1926a), Theorie der Wirtschaflichen Entwicklung, 2 Aufl., Berlin: Duncker und Hublot. Schumpeter, J. (1926b), Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von heute, Schmollers Jahrbuch fuer Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich, 50, pp. 337-388. Schumpeter, J. (1927), Sombarts Dritter Band, Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche 51: pp. 349-69. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1939), Business Cycles: A theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill. Schumpeter, J. (1949), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1952), Sozialistische Moeglichkeiten von heute, in J.A. Schumpeter, Aufsaetze zur oekonomischen Theorie, Tuebingen: J.C.B. Mohr-Verlag, pp. 455-510 [1921]. Schumpeter, J. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York. Schumpeter, J. (1971), The Instability of Capitalism, in N. Rosenberg (ed.), The Economics of Technological Change, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 13-42 [1928]. Schumpeter, J. (1987), Sombarts Dritter Band, in B. vom Brocke (ed.) Sombart’s ‘Moderner Kapitalismus’, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, pp. 196-219 [1927]. Shionoya, Y. (1990), Instrumentalism in Schumpeter’s Economic Methodology, History of Political Economy 22 (summer): pp. 187-222.  Shionoya, Y. (1991), Schumpeter on Schmoller and Weber: A Methodology of Economic Socilogy, History of Political Economy 23, pp. 193-219. Shionoya, Y. (1997), Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Meatheoretical Study, Cambridge University Press. Shionoya, Y. (2001), Rational Reconstruction of the German Historical School: An Overview, in Y. Shionoya (ed.), The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics, Routledge, pp. 7-18. Shionoya, Y. (2005), The Soul of the German Historical School, New York: Springer. Smithies, A. (1951), “Memorial: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883-1950”, in Schumpeter, Social Scientist, (ed.) Seymour Harris, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Sombart, W. (1897), Ideale de Sozialpolitik, Archiv fuer soziale Gesetzgebung und Statistik, X: pp. 1-48. Sombart, W. (1908), Sozialismus und soziale Bewegung, Jena: Gustav Fischer- Verlag. Sombart, W. (1909), Der Kapitalistische Unternehmer, Archiv fuer Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik, XXIX: pp. 689-758. Sombart, W. (1913a), Der Bourgeois, Munich and Leipzig: Dunker and Humblot (English Translation (1967) [1915], The Quintessence of Capitalism, New York: H. Fertig. Sombart, W. (1913b), Luxus und Kapitalismus, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Sombart, W. (1913c), Krieg und Kapitalismus, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot. Sombart, W. (1916), Der Moderne Kapitalismus, Vol. 1: Einleitung – Die vorkapitalistischen Wirtschaft – Die historischen Grundlangen des modernen Kapitalismus, Munich and Leipzig: Dunker and Humblot. Sombart, W. (1924), Der proletarische Sozialismus, 2 vols., Jena: Gustav Fischer – Verlag. Sombart, W. (1925), Prinzipielle Eigenart des modernen Kapitalismus, in Grundriss der Sozialoekonomik, IV, Abteilung/ 1. Teil, Tuebingen: J.C.B. Mohr- Verlag.  Sombart, W. (1927), Das Wirtschaftsleben im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus, vol. III/1,2, Der moderne Kapitalismus, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Sombart, W. (1930), Die drei Nationaloekonomien, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Sombart, W. (1932), Die Zukunft des Kapitalismus, Berlin: Buchholz and Weisswange. Sombart, W. (1934), Deutsher Sozialismus, Berlin: Buchholz and Weisswange. Spiethoff, A. (1932), Die Allgemeine Volkswirtschaftslehre als geschichtliche Theorie, Die Wirtschaftsstile, Schmollers Jahrbuch fuer Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 56: p. 51-84. Spiethoff, A. (1952), The Historical Character of Economic Theories, The Journal of Economic History 12: p. 131-9. Swedberg, R. (1991), Joseph A. Schumpeter: His Life and Work, Oxford: Polity Press Usher, A. P. (1951), “Historical Implications of the Theory of Economic Development”, in Schumpeter, Social Scientist, (ed.) Seymour Harris, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Veblen, T. (1898), Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, XII, July. Weber, M. (1904), Die Protestantisches Εthic und der Geist des Kapitalismus (Teil A), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, XX, pp. 1-55. Weber, M. (1905), Die Protestantisches Εthic und der Geist des Kapitalismus (Teil B), Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, XXI, pp. 1-110. Weber, M. (1930), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.  |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74471 |