Yeshineh, Alekaw Kebede (2016): Determinants and Potentials of Foreign Trade in Ethiopia: A Gravity Model Analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74509.pdf Download (334kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study, attempts are made to provide a theoretical justification for using the gravity model to analyze bilateral trade flows. The augmented gravity model was adopted to analyse Ethiopia's trade with its main trading partners using the panel data estimation technique. Estimations of the gravity model for export, import and total trade (sum of exports and imports) are carried on. The estimated results show that Ethiopia's export, import and total trade are positively determined by the size of the economies, per capita GDP differential and openness of the trading countries' economies. Specifically, the major determinants of Ethiopia’s exports are: size of the economies(GDP's of Ethiopia and that of partner), partner countries’ openness of economies, economic similarity and per capita GDP differential of the countries. All these factors affected Ethiopia's export positively except similarity indicator. The exchange rate, on the other hand, has no effect on Ethiopia's export trade. Ethiopia's imports are also determined by GDP's (of Ethiopia and the partner country), per capita income differentials and openness of the countries involved in trade. Transportation cost is found to be a significant factor in influencing Ethiopia's trade negatively. On the other hand, Ethiopia's export and import trade are not found to be influenced to by common border . The country specific effects show that Ethiopia could do better by trading more with Comesa member countries and newly emerging economies of Asia such as Hong Kong, Singapore and Yemen as well as European countries like Turkey and Russia.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Determinants and Potentials of Foreign Trade in Ethiopia: A Gravity Model Analysis |
English Title: | Determinants and Potentials of Foreign Trade in Ethiopia: A Gravity Model Analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Gravity Model, Panel Data, Fixed Effect Model, Random Effect Model, Hausman Tyalor Model, Ethiopia’s Trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade |
Item ID: | 74509 |
Depositing User: | Mr Alekaw Kebede Yeshineh |
Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2016 13:19 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:34 |
References: | Abdulaziz A. (2009). Evaluation of Ethiopia's Bilateral and Potential Exports in the Middle East: A Gravity Approach, MA Project, Addis Ababa University. Alemayehu G. (2009). The Potential for Intra-Africa Trade and the Supply and Demand Constraints for its Realization, ECA Regional Integration Studies. Alemayehu G. etal.(2010). Export Supply Response Capacity Constraints in Ethiopia, African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi, Kenya. Anderson, J.E.(1979) A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 69, 106-16. Anderson, James E. and van Wincoop, Eric (2003): “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle,” The American Economic Review, vol. 93(1), pp. 170-192, March. Baltagi, B. H., Bresson, G. and Pirotte, A., (2003). Fixed Effects, Random Effects or Hausman-Taylor? A Prestest Estimator. Economics Letters 79, 361-369. Batra,A. (2006). India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327-361. Benedictis, L.De, and Vicarelli, C. (2004). Trade Potential in Gravity Panel Data Models. Berkeley Electronic Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy. Bergstand,J.(1985).The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474-81. Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143-153. Bergstrand, J.H. (1990). The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade. Economic Journal, 100(403), 1216-1229. Carbaugh, R. J. (2006). International Economics, 10th Edition. Canada, South-Western, Thompson. Deardorff, A.V. (1995). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?, NBER Working Paper 5377, Cambridge MA. Egger, Peter. (2002). An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials. The World Economy, 25, 297-312. Eaton J. and S. Kortum (2002) Technology, Geography and Trade, Econometrica. Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1997). Technology and Bilateral Trade, in NBER Working Paper, No. 6253, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Evenett S. J. and W. Keller (2002) On Theories Explaining The Success of The Gravity Equation, Journal of Political Economy,110, 2, 281-316. Feenstra, R. (2003). Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Chapter 5, Princeton University Press. Frankel, J.A. (1997) Regional Trading Blocks in the World Economy, Institute of International Economics, New York. Frankel, J. and Wei, S.J.(1993). Emerging Currency Blocs’, Mimeo, University of California-Berkeley. Frankel, J.A. Gebreeyseus G.(2011). Explaining Ethiopia's Foreign Trade Potential: A Dynamic Gravity Approach, Addis Ababa University. Greene, W.H. (2003). Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, New Jersey). Gujrati, D.N. (2003). Panel Data Regression Models. In Basic Econometrics (4thed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Hausman, A. J. and Taylor, E. W. (1981). Panel Data and Unobservable Individual E§ects. Econometrica 49, 1377-1398. Head, Keith (2003).Gravity for Beginners, Mimeography, University of British Columbia. Helpman (1987) Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence From Fourteen Industrialized Countries. Journal of Japanese and International Economics.Vol.1. Helpman, E. and Krugman. P. R. (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. MIT Press. Cambridge. Helpman, E. 1984. ‘ Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets, Trade Theory’, in Ronald W. Jones and Peter B. Kenen, eds. Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland. Kalbasi, H. (2001). The Gravity Model and Global Trade Flows. Isfahan: University of Isfahan, Department of Economics. Mulugeta Ayehu (2009). Modeling the Determinants of Ethiopia's Trade Flows‖: A Gravity Approach, MA Project, Addis Ababa University. Matias Assefa (2010). An Empirical Study of China's Trade Potential with Africa‖, MSc Thesis, Addis Ababa University. The Federal Democratic Republic 0f Ethiopia (2007). Foreign Trade Promotion Manual For Ethiopian Diplomatic Missions, Economic and Business Affairs General Directorate Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ozdeser, H., and Dizen, E. (2010). Turkey’s Trade Potential with Euro-Zone Countries: A Gravity Study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 43(1). Paas, T. (2002). Regional Integration of International Trade in the Context of EU Eastward Enlargement. Discussion Paper 218. Hamburg: Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv. Poyhonen,P.(1963).ATentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93-100. Rahman, M.M. (2003). A Panel Analysis of Bangladesh’s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach. Sydney: University of Sydney. Rahman, M., Shadat, W.B., and Das, N.C. (2006). Trade Potential in SAFTA: An Application of Augmented Gravity Model. Paper 61. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue. Rahman, M.M. (2009). ustralia's Global Trade Potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis, Oxford University, UK. Rahman, M.M. and Ara, L.A. (2010). Bangladesh Trade Potential: a Dynamic Gravity Approach, Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 9 (2): 130-147. Tinbergen,J.(1962). An Analysis of World Trade Flows. In Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund. Yishak T.(2009).Determinants of Ethiopia's Export Performance: A Gravity Model Analysis, Trade and Development Discussion Paper No. 01/2009, bkp Development Research and Consulting, Germany. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74509 |