The Economics of Rhetoric: On Metaphors as Institutions

Lanteri, Alessandro and Yalcintas, Altug (2006): The Economics of Rhetoric: On Metaphors as Institutions. Published in: Ankara University GETA Working Papers No. 94 (April 2006)

Abstract

The professional life of economists takes place within the boundaries of the institution of academic economics. Belonging to the institution enable economists in many ways. It provides a context wherein their contribution is meaningful. But it constrains, too, what economists are allowed to do or say. Thus, institutions both enable and constrain individual action. Metaphors do the same and are therefore, in this respect, institutions. They are place-holders to communicate our beliefs, feelings, and thoughts. So far, there is nothing wrong. This may become a problem, however, as Richard Rorty has once said, when the “happenstance of our cultural development [is] that we got stuck so long with place-holders.” In the essay we focus on the enabling and disabling roles of metaphors as institutions in the rhetoric of economics. We argue, from the perspective of economics of rhetoric, that some of the metaphors can lead us to path dependent circumstances where the performance of the metaphors is not as desirable as it was when the metaphors were first introduced. Sometimes certain metaphors undergo exaptation, and are employed with new functions. Altogether, we believe, the tools of institutional economics can be fruitfully employed to study metaphors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Economics of rhetoric; metaphors as Institutions; path Dependence; exaptation
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary ; Austrian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

Arcuri, A. 2004. “A Different Reason for ‘De-Coasing’ Environmental Law and Economics” Arthur, B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events” Economic Journal 97. Arthur, B. 1998. “The PreText Interview with Brian Arthur”, interviewed by Dominic Gates, available at http://www.pretext.com/may98/colums/interview.htm [Accessed May 2002]. Austin, J. 1962 (1975). How to Do Things with Words (Harvard University Press) Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling Passions (Oxford University Press). Boulding, K. 1971. “After Samuelson, who Needs Adam Smith?” History of Political Economy, 3. Coase, R. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm” Economica, 4 Coase, R. 1984. “The New Institutional Economics” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140 March. Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., and Sharp, D.W. 1971. The Cultural Context of Learning and Thinking (Basic Books). Commons, J. 1931. “Institutional Economics” American Economic Review 21 December. Cooter, R. and Ulen, T. 1995. Law and Economics (Addison-Wesley). Denzau, A. and North, D. 1994. “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions” Kyklos, 47 (1): 3-31 David, P. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review 75(2). David, P. 1992. “Heroes Herds and Hysteresis in Technological History: ‘The Battle of Systems Reconsidered’”, Industry and Corporate Change, 1. Davis, J. 2004. The Theory of Individual in Economics: Identity and Value (Routledge). Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press). Gould, S. and Vrba, E. 1982. “Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form” Paleobiology, 8 Gould, S. 1991. “Exaptation: a crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology” Journal of Social Issues, 47 Hands, W. 2001. Reflections without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory (Cambridge University Press). Harris, R. 2005. A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices, available at http://www.virtualsalt.com/rhetoric.htm [Accessed March 2006]. Harrison, J. 1995. Law and Economics (West Publishing Co.). Hausman, D. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics (Cambridge University Press). Hayek, F. 1952 (1999). The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology (University of Chicago Press). Hesse, M. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science (University of Notre Dame Press). Hodgson, G. 2003. “The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27 Klamer, A. 1984. Conversation with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers). Klamer, A. 2006. Speaking of Economics: How to Be in the Conversation (Routledge). Klamer, A. and Leonard, T. 1994. “So what’s an economic metaphor?” in Mirowski (ed.). Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By (The University of Chicago Press). Lanteri, A. 2003. “Economics: The Institution and its Metaphors. A Positive Ethical Perspective on Experimental Evidence” Mimeo. Levy, D. 2001. How the Dismal Science got its name. Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics (University of Michigan Press). Marciano, A. (2006), “From public choice to new law and economics: The process of de-legalisation of the law”. Presented at EIPE Seminar (30 Jan), Rotterdam McCloskey, D. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics” Journal of Economic Literature 21(2) June. McCloskey, D. 1985 (1998). The Rhetoric of Economics (University of Wisconsin Press). McCloskey, D. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics (Cambridge University Press). McCloskey, D. 1996. The Vices of Economists, the Virtues of the Bourgeois (Amsterdam University Press). McCloskey, D. 1997. “The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: Comment on the Medema-Zebra Paper” In Medema (ed.). McCloskey, D. 2006. Bourgeois Virtues. Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago University Press) McDougall, W. 1923. An Introduction to Social Psychology (John W. Luce) Medema, S. (ed.) 1997. Coasean Economics: The New Institutional Economics and Law and Economics (Boston: Kluwer). Mirowski, P. (ed.) 1994. Natural Images in Economic Thought (Cambridge University Press). Mirowski, P. 2001. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Nelson, R. 2001. Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chiago and Beyond (Pennsylvania State University Press). Nietzsche, F. 1873. “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense.” Nietzsche, F. 1895. Twilight of Idols or How One Philosophizes with a Hammer (Penguin Books). Rhoads, S. 1985. The Economist’s View of the World: Government, Markets and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press) Rizzello, S. 2003. “Introduction: towards a cognitive evolutionary economics” in Rizzello, S. (ed.). Rizzello, S. (ed.) 2003. Cognitive Paradigms in Economics (Routledge). Rizzello, S. 2004. “Knowledge as a Path Dependence Process” Journal of Bioeconomics 6. Rorty, R. 1981. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press). Samuelson, P. 1947 (1983). Foundations of Economic Analysis (Harvard University Press). Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press). Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge University Press). Stigler, G. 1966. The Theory of Price (The Macmillan Co.). Veblen, T. 1898 (1994). The Theory of the Leisure Class (Penguin Books). Yalçıntaş, A. 2006. “Historical Small Events and the Eclipse of Utopia: Perspectives on Path Dependence in Human Thought“ Culture Theory and Critique 47(1) Spring.