Sefiani, Yassine and Davies, Barry and Bown, Robin (2016): The perceptual effects of location on the performance of small businesses.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74768.pdf Download (307kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to develop a clearer understanding of the effects of location on the performance of small and medium enterprises in Tangier, as perceived by local owner-managers.
Prior Work - Several studies have attempted to explain the role of location on business performance. Whilst some studies have stressed urban and rural locations, other studies have often paid particular attention to the connection of location and taxation and industry clustering effects. While the findings of these studies are important, they are perhaps insufficient in fully understanding the role of location.
Approach - Fifteen in-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected owner-managers of SMEs, forming a judgmental selection, to explore their experiences, beliefs, and attitudes with respect to their performance.
Results - Findings of the study revealed that location is a salient factor that influences the performance of SMEs in Tangier. Although at the research design stage it was considered a classificatory variable, location was mentioned extensively in the interviews, in relation to the ‘free zones’. Findings showed that firms located within the free zones enjoyed favourable conditions, in particular, those related to taxation and competition, compared to their counterparts located outside the free zones, which were excluded from these benefits. Furthermore, perceived unfair competition damaged the performance of the SMEs. These findings suggest that the placement of the business in relation to the free zones thus became an important financial and emotionally significant perspective on equality in relation to success.
Implications - Findings could encourage the government to adopt policies that will assist indigenous firms to benefit from advantages that are comparable to those that are available to those in the free zones. Greater attention to the perceptual effects of location would be advantageous.
Value - This research contributes to the theory about SME development in that it highlights the issue of location as a significant factor in the perception of success.Location was a much more acute and multi-faceted issue than in most other studies. In this context of Tangier, ‘location’ may function as a higher-order concept (than say urban versus rural) in relation to, both the placement of business within a country, and choices between countries as jurisdictions in terms of location. There have been few studies on what might be called the psycho-geography of small business, given the predominant view that we are seeing the ‘death of distance’.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The perceptual effects of location on the performance of small businesses |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Location, Performance, SMEs, free zones, unfair competition, Tangier |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M19 - Other |
Item ID: | 74768 |
Depositing User: | Dr Yassine Sefiani |
Date Deposited: | 29 Oct 2016 07:12 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 13:10 |
References: | Alcácer, J. (2006). Location choices across the value chain: how activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science , 52 (10), 1457-1471. Alcácer, J., & Chung , W. (2007). Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science , 53 (5), 760-776. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science , 45 (7), 905-917. Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research (12 ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy , 27 (5), 525–540. Birch, D. (1989). Change, innovation, and job generation. Journal of labor research , 10 (1), 33-38. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (2000). Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of International Business Studies , 31 (1), 141-154. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Bolton Committee Report. (1971). Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Small Firms. London: HMSO . Borden N.H. (1964). The Concept of the Marketing Mix. Journal of Advertising Research, 24 (4): 7-12 Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford university press. Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: how the communications revolution is changing our lives. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press Child, J. (1973). Predicting and understanding organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly , 18 (2), 168-185. Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., Ryan, C. D., Asheim, B. ̧., & Phillips, P. (2006). Comparing a pharmaceutical and an agro-food bioregion: On the importance of knowledge bases for socio-spatial patterns of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 13(4), 393-414 Cooper, A., & Folta, T. (2000). Entrepreneurship and high-technology clusters. In D. L. Sexton, & H. I. Landstron, The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell. Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: A replication and extension of the Cooper et al. study. Enterprise and innovation management studies , 1 (1), 1-17. Dess, G., & Robinson, R. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal , 5 (3), 265-273. Dockel, J., & Ligthelm, A. (2005). Factors Responsible for the Growth of Small Businesses. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences , 8 (1), 54-62. Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Baik, Y. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing , 21 (2), 217–242. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. London: Hutchinson. Gorgievski, M. J., Ascalon, M. E. & Stephan, U. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (2), 207-232. Guzman, J., & Santos, F. (2001). The booster function and the entrepreneurial quality: An application to the Province of Seville. Entrepreneurial and Regional Development , 13 (3), 211-228. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. Harabi, N. (2003). Determinants of firm growth: An empirical analysis from Morocco. MPRA Paper . Switzerland: University of Applied Sciences. Jennings, P., & Beaver, G. (1997). The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: A management perspective. International Small Business Journal , 15 (2), 63-75. Laitinen, E. K. (2002). A dynamic performance measurement system: evidence from small Finnish technology companies. Scandinavian Journal of Management , 18 (2), 65-99. Liedholm, C. (2002). Small firm dynamics: Evidence from Africa and Latin America. Small Business Economics , 18 (1-3), 227-242. Lien, M.E. (1997) Marketing and Modernity. Oxford: Berg. Ligthelm, A. A. (2010). Entrepreneurship and small business sustainability. Southern African Business Review , 14 (3), 131-153. Ligthelm, A. A., & Cant, M. C. (2002). Business success factors of SMEs in Gauteng: a proactive entrepeneurial approach. Bureau of Market Research, University of South Africa. Man, T. W., & Lau, T. (2005). The context of entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: an investigation through the patterns of entrepreneurial competencies in contrasting industrial environments. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development , 12 (4), 464-481. Markman, G., & Baron, R. (2003). Person-entrepreneurship fit: Why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review , 13 (2), 281-301. McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management , 34 (3), 532-565. McCline, R., Bhat, S., & Baj, P. (2000). Opportunity recognition: An exploratory investigation of a component of the entrepreneurial process in the context of the health care industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 25 (2), 81-94. Ministère de l'Industrie, du Commerce et des Nouvelles Technologies. (2007). Retrieved November 9, 2009, from http://www.mcinet.gov.ma/Pages/default.aspx Ministère de l'Industrie, du Commerce et des Nouvelles Technologies. (2011). Secteur industriel: tableau de bord annuel. Régions économiques. Rabat: Ministère de l'Industrie, du Commerce et des Nouvelles Technologies. Ostgaard, T., & Birley, S. (1995). New venture competitive strategies and their relation to growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development , 7 (2), 119-141. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative education methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press. Porter, M. E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review , 29 (2), 258-271. Sridhar, K., & Wan, G. (2010). Firm location choice in cities: Evidence from China, India, and Brazil. China Economic Review , 21 (1), 113-122. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding small firms. London: Routledge. Storey, D. (2011). Optimism and chance: the elephants in the entrepreneurship room. International Small Business Journal , 29 (4), 303-321. Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy , 32 (2), 229-253. The European Commission . (2011). Are EU SMEs recovering from the crisis? Annual report on EU small and medium sized enterprises 2010/2011. Rotterdam: ECORYS Nederland BV. Warren, Nicholas de, (2009), Husserl and the Promise of Time : Subjectivity in Transcendental Phenomenology, Cambridge, CUP UNECA. (2008). Les petites et moyennes entreprises acteurs de développement durable en Afrique du Nord. Rabat: UNECA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74768 |