Konow, James and Saijo, Tatsuyoshi and Akai, Kenju (2016): Equity versus Equality.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75376.pdf Download (789kB) | Preview |
Abstract
How should economic output be distributed among those who created it? An expansive theoretical and empirical literature seeks to answer this fundamental, and controversial, question, which has implications, inter alia, for the structure of wages, redistributive policies and international agreements. Among the possible fairness rules that have been proposed, the primary rivals are equality and equity, whereby the latter refers to allocating in proportion to some measure of individual contributions. This paper reports the results of an experiment conducted in the United States and Japan. It investigates a large variety of factors that might affect preferences for equity and equality, including multiple approaches to examining concepts of culture. We find impersonal third parties, or spectators, exclusively favour equity. Distributive preferences move incrementally toward equality, however, when subjects share personal stakes (i.e., are stakeholders), and even further toward equality, when stakeholder anonymity is lifted. Although the degree of self-interest sometimes differs across countries, these findings about fairness preferences are robust with respect to a wide range of non-ethics variables that seldom matter, including race, income, gender, nationality and culture. We interpret the findings as suggesting that equity is an impersonal (or impartial) rule of fairness, whereas fairness preferences move progressively toward equality with greater proximity, i.e., as relationships become more personal through belonging to a group and being non-anonymous.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Equity versus Equality |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | fairness, equity, equality, experiments |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement |
Item ID: | 75376 |
Depositing User: | James Konow |
Date Deposited: | 05 Dec 2016 10:16 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:18 |
References: | Akerlof, George, and Kranton, Rachel (2000). "Economics and Identity," Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 715-753. Alesina, Alberto, and Angeletos, George-Marios (2005). "Fairness and Redistribution," The American Economic Review 95(4), 960-980. Alesina, Alberto, Cozzi, Guido, and Mantovan, Noemi (2012). “The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness and Redistribution,” The Economic Journal 122(565), 1244-1261. Almås, Ingvild, Cappelen, Alexander, Salvanes, Kjell G., Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2016). “Willingness to Compete: Family Matters,” Management Science 62 (8), 2149-2162. Andreoni, James (1990). “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving”, The Economic Journal 100(401), 464-477. Balafoutas, Loukas, Kocher, Martin, Putterman, Louis, and Sutter, Matthias (2013). “Equality, Equity, and Incentives: An Experiment,” European Economic Review 60 (May), 32-51. Ben-Ner, Avner, Kong, Fanmin, and Putterman, Louis (2004). "Share and Share Alike? Gender-Pairing, Personality, and Cognitive Ability as Determinants of Giving," Journal of Economic Psychology 25(5), 581-589. Blanco, Mariana, Engelmann, Dirk, and Normann, Hans Theo (2011). “A Within-subject Analysis of Other-regarding Preferences,” Games and Economic Behavior 72 (2), 321-338. Bohnet, Iris, and Frey, Bruno S. (1999a). "Social Distance and Other-regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment," The American Economic Review 89(1), 335-339. Bohnet, Iris, and Frey, Bruno S. (1999b). "The Sound of Silence in Prisoner’s Dilemma and Dictator Games," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38(1), 43-57. Bolton, Gary, Katok, Elena, and Zwick, Rami (1998). "Dictator Game Giving: Rules of Fairness versus Acts of Kindness," International Journal of Game Theory 27(2), 269-299. Bracha, Anat and Vesterlund, Lise (2013). “How Law Can You Go? Charity Reporting When Donations Signal Income and Generosity,” Working Papers No.13-11. Brandts, Jordi, Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, and Schram, Arthur (2004) “How universal is behavior? A four country comparison of spite and cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanisms,” Public Choice 119 (3-4), 381-424. Buchan, Nancy, and Croson, Rachel (2004). "The Boundaries of Trust: Own and Others’ Actions in the US and China," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55(4), 485-504. Buchan, Nancy, Johnson, Eric, and Croson, Rachel (2006). “Let’s get personal: An International Examination of the Influence of Communication, Culture and Social Distance on other Regarding Preferences,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(3), 373-398. Burdín, Gabriel (2015). “Equality Under Threat by the Talented: Evidence from Worker-Managed Firms,” The Economic Journal 126(594), 1372-1403. Camerer, Colin (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cappelen, Alexander, Hole, Astri, Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2007). “The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach,” American Economic Review 97 (3), 818-827. Cappelen, Alexander, Moene, Karl Ove, Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2013). “Needs Versus Entitlements – An International Fairness Experiment,” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(3), 574-598. Cappelen, Alexander, Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2010). “Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility,” European Economic Review 54(3), 429-441. Carpenter, Jeffrey, Matthews, Peter, and Schirm (2010). “Tournaments and Office Politics: Evidence from a Real Effort Experiment,” American Economic Review 100(1), 504-517. Cason, Timothy, and Mui, Vai-Lam (1997). “A Laboratory Study of Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game,” The Economic Journal 107(444), 1465-1483. Cason, Timothy, Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, and Yamato, Takehiko (2002). "Voluntary Participation and Spite in Public Good Provision Experiments: An International Comparison," Experimental Economics 5(2), 133-153. Charness, Gary, and Gneezy, Uri (2008). “What's in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 68(1), 29-35. Charness, Gary, and Rabin, Matthew (2002). "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests." Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817-869. Chen, Yan and Li, Sherry (2009). “Group Identity and Social Preferences,” American Economic Review 99(1), 431-57. Cherry, Todd L., Kroll, Stephan, and Shogren, Jason F. (2005). “The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions: Evidence from the Lab,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57(3), 357-365. Corgnet, Brice (2012). “Peer Evaluations and Team Performance: When Friends Do Worse than Strangers,” Economic Inquiry 50(1), 171-181. Crawford, Vincent, Gneezy, Uri, and Rottenstreich, Yuval, (2008). “The Power of Focal Points Is Limited: Minute Payoff Asymmetry May Yield Large Coordination Failures,” American Economic Review 98(4), 1443-1458. Croson, Rachel, and Konow, James (2009). "Social Preferences and Moral Biases," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 69(3), 201-212. Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri (2009). "Gender Differences in Preferences," Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 448-474. Dufwenberg, Martin, and Muren, Astri (2006). "Generosity, Anonymity, Gender," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61(1), 42-49. Di Tella, Rafael, Perez-Truglia, Babino, Andres, and Sigman, Mariano (2015). “Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs about Others’ Altruism,” American Economic Review 105(11), 3416-3442. Eckel, Catherine, and Grossman, Philip (2001). "Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games," Economic Inquiry 39(2), 171-188. Ellingsen, Tore, and Johannesson, Magnus (2008). “Anticipated Verbal Feedback Induces Altruistic Behavior,” Evolution and Human Behavior 29(2), 100-105. Engel, Christoph (2011). “Dictator Games: A Meta Study,” Experimental Economics 14(4), 583-610. Falk, Armin and Ichino, Andrea (2006). “Clean Evidence on Peer Effects,” Journal of Labor Economics 24(1), 39-57. Faravelli, Marco (2007). “How Context Matters: A Survey Based Experiment on Distributive Justice,” Journal of Public Economics 91(7-8), 1399-1422. Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs, (2004). "Third Party Punishment and Social Norms," Evolution and Human Behavior 25(2), 63-87. Fehr, Ernst, and Schmidt, Klaus M. (1999). "A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation." Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817-868. Fischer, Ronald and Smith, Peter (2003). “Reward Allocation and Culture a Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34(3), 251-268. Fong, Christina, and Luttmer, Erzo (2009). “What Determines Giving to Hurricane Katrina Victims? Experimental Evidence on Racial Group Loyalty,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(2), 64-87. Forsythe, Robert, Horowitz, Joel, Savin, Nathan and Sefton Martin (1994). “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments,” Games and Economic Behavior 6(3), 347-369. Frank, Robert (2004). What Price the Moral High Ground? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe, and Moore, Bernard (2001). “Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator games: the cost of anonymity,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46(3), 271-290. Gächter, Simon, and Riedl, Arno (2005). “Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims,” Management Science 51(2), 249-263. Gächter, Simon, and Riedl, Arno (2006). "Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems," Social Choice and Welfare 27(3), 571-594. Goette, Lorenz, Huffman David, and Meirer, Stephan (2012). “The Impact of Social Ties on Group Interactions: Evidence from Minimal Groups and Randomly Assigned Real Groups,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(1), 101-115. Greenberg, Jerald (2001). "Studying Organizational Justice Cross-Culturally: Fundamental Challenges," The International Journal of Conflict Management 12(4), 365-375. Güth, Werner (1988). "On the Behavioral Approach to Distributive Justice: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation." In Aspects of Distributive Justice, edited by Shlomo Maital. New York: New York University Press. Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert, and McElreath, Richard (2001). “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies,” American Economic Review 91(2), 73-78. Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, and Smith, Vernon (1996). “Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games,” American Economic Review 86(3), 653-660. Hofstede, Geert (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Holm, Håkan, and Danielson, Anders (2005). "Tropic Trust versus Nordic Trust: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania and Sweden," The Economic Journal, 115(5), 505-532. Kashima, Yoshihisa, Siegel, Michael, Tanaka, Kenichiro, and Isaka, Hiroko (1988). “Universalism in Lay Conceptions of Distributive Justice: A Cross-Cultural Examination,” International Journal of Psychology 23, 51-64. Kocher, Martin G., Cherry, Todd L., Kroll, Stephan, Netzer, Robert J., and Sutter, Matthias (2008). “Conditional Cooperation on Three Continents,” Economics Letters 101(3), 175-178. Konow, James (2012). “Adam Smith and the Modern Science of Ethics,” Economics and Philosophy 28(3), 333-362. Konow, James (2000). "Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions," American Economic Review 90(4), 1072-92. Konow, James (2009). “Is Fairness in the Eye of the Beholder? An Impartial Spectator Analysis of Justice,” Social Choice Welfare 33(1), 101-127. Konow, James (2003). "Which is the Fairest One of All?: A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1186-1237. Konow, James, Johansson-Stenman, Olof, Martinsson, Peter, and Medhin, Haileselassie (2016). “The Just World Hypothesis: Theory and a Natural Field Experiment,” work-in-progress. Lange, Andreas, Loschel, Andreas, Vogt, Carsten, and Ziegler, Andreas (2010). “On the Self-interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations.” European Economic Review 54(3), 359-375. List, John A. (2007). “On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games,” Journal of Political Economy 115(3), 482-493. Luhan, Wolfgang, Kocher, Martin, and Sutter, Matthias (2009). "Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game Reconsidered," Experimental Economics 12(1), 26-41. Noussair, Charles, and Tan, Fangfang (2011). “Voting on Punishment Systems Within a Heterogeneous Group,” Journal of Public Economic Theory 13(5), 661-693. Ohtake, Fumio, and Saito, Makoto (1998). “Population Aging and Consumption Inequality in Japan,” Review of Income and Wealth 44, 361-381. Okada, Akira and Riedl, Arno (1999). “When Culture Does Not Matter: Experimental Evidence from Coalition Formation Ultimatum Games in Austria and Japan,” Manuscript. Ooghe, Erwin and Peichl, Andreas (2015). “Fair and Efficient Taxation Under Partial Control,” The Economic Journal 125(586), 2024-2051. Piff, Paul, Kraus, Michael, Côté, Stéphane, Cheng, Bonnie, and Keltner, Dacher (2010). “Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(5), 771-784. Piketty, Thomas (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rey-Biel, Pedro, Sheremeta, Roman, and Uler, Neslihan (2016). “When Income Depends on Performance and Luck: The Effects of Culture and Information on Giving,” Manuscript. Reuben, Ernesto and Riedl, Arno (2013). “Enforcement of Contribution Norms in Public Good Games with Heterogeneous Populations,” Games and Economic Behavior 77(1), 122-137. Roth, Alvin, Prasnikar, Vesna, Okuno-Fujiwara, Masahiro, and Zamir, Shmuel (1991). “Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study,” American Economic Review 81(5), 1068-1095. Sama, Linda, and Papamarcos, Steven (2000). “Hofstede’s I-C Dimension as Predictive of Allocative Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis,” International Journal of Value-Based Management 13(2), 173-188. Schram, Aruthur, and Charness, Gary (2015). “Introducing Social Norms in Laboratory Allocation Choices,” Management Science 61(7), 1531-1546. Singelis, Theodore M., Triandis, Harry C., Bhawuk, Dharm P. S., and Gelfand, Michele J. (1995). “Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement.” Cross-Cultural Research 29(3), 240-275. Stiglitz, Joseph (2012): The Prince of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Tachibanaki, Toshiaki (2005). Confronting Income Inequality in Japan: A Comparative Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Reform, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John (1979). “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William Austin. Monterey: Brooks/Cole. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75376 |