Friedrich, Thomas (2016): Aquila non captat muscas :Homo Economicus between exploration and exploitation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75601.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Three different strategic types of ensembles are compared on basis of their calculated superadditive net profit. The superadditive and peaceful ensemble of two Homo Economicus serves us with the starting value. From there two ensemble types emerge rearranging substrate within the ensemble through exploitation with force and deception of source and/or sink. An increasing transfer of substrate will, after an initial increase of rational superadditivity, finally lead to a dominating amount of irrational subadditivity. They are a conditional and an unconditional violent and deceptive ensemble. A third type, not rearranging substrate within the ensemble, is able to increase superadditivity by exploration and transfer from the outside of the ensemble. Dependent ensembles with a master and independent ensembles are considered. A low (realistic) finding probability for new substrate is assumed in all examples. The unconditional violent and deceptive ensemble is in most of the cases superior according to the maximal possible superadditivity. This is altered after consideration of the investments necessary. Besides the three pure types also mixed types are investigated. Mixed strategic types are constructed assuming a mosaic structure of pure behaviour. The result is the topography of superadditivity or subadditivity. With this topography it becomes possible to assess the maximal investment for force and deception and compare the strategies. Extreme subadditivity can be avoided by a revolution of the transfer direction or by a recreation of the starting conditions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Aquila non captat muscas :Homo Economicus between exploration and exploitation |
English Title: | Aquila non captat muscas :Homo Economicus between exploration and exploitation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | utility function, source, sink, ensemble, supply, demand, violence, deception, framing effect, exploration, exploitation, superadditivity, subadditivity, Homo Economicus |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General |
Item ID: | 75601 |
Depositing User: | Thomas / T Friedrich |
Date Deposited: | 15 Dec 2016 16:03 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 04:59 |
References: | 1. Gandolfi AE, Gandolfi AS, Barash DP (2002) Economics As an Evolutionary Science: From Utility to Fitness, ISBN 0-7658-0123-X 2. Tversky A and Kahneman D (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, New Series, Vol. 211, 4481: 453-458 3. Friedrich T and Köpper W (2013) Schumpeter´s Gale: Mixing and compartmentalization in Economics and Biology. MPRA 45305 4. Friedrich T (2014) Work cycles of independent ensembles. MPRA 55090 5. Friedrich T (2015) The limits of wise exploitation in dependent and independent symmetric ensembles. MPRA 68250 6. Turner PE and Chao L (1999) Prisoner's dilemma in an RNA virus. Nature 1999; 98: 441-443. 7. MacLean RC, Fuentes-Hernandez A, Greig D, Hurst LD, Gudelj I (2010) A Mixture of “Cheats” and “Co-Operators” Can Enable Maximal Group Benefit. PLoS Biol 8(9): e1000486. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000486 8. Friedrich T (2014) Entanglement by Genes or Shares; Hamilton´s rule of kin selection revisited. MPRA 60267 9. Rappaport A (1999) New Thinking on How to Link Executive Pay with Performance. Harvard Business Review 10. Rapaport A and Bogle JC (2011) Saving Capitalism from Short-Termism: How to Build Long-Term Value and Take back Our Financial Future. ISBN: 9780071736367 11. Bowle S, Santa Fe Institute, The Death of ‘Homo Economicus. u-tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ParPPYMzfQM 12. Milinski M, Hilbe C, Semmann D, Sommerfeld R, and Marotzke J (2016) Humans choose representatives who enforce cooperation in social dilemmas through extortion. Nature Communications 7: art. Number 10915 13. Rogers A, Dash RK, Ramchurn, SD, Vytelingum P, and Jennings, NR (2007) Coordinating Team Players within a Noisy Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Tournament Theoretical Computer Science 377 (1-3) pp. 243-25 14. Yamagishi T, Takagishi H, Fermin AdSR, Kanai R, Li Y, and Matsumoto Y (2015) Cortical thickness of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts strategic choices in economic games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 20: 5582–5587 15. Crockett MJ, Clark L, Tabibnia G, Lieberman MD, and Robbins TW (2008) Serotonin Modulates Behavioral Reactions to Unfairness. Science, 320 (5884) 16. Yamagishi T, Li Y, Matsumoto Y, and Kiyonari T (2016) Moral Bargain Hunters Purchase Moral Righteousness When it is Cheap: Within-Individual Effect of Stake Size in Economic Games; Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 27824 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75601 |