Ozili, Peterson K (2016): Paying Bank Risk Professionals to Lie About Bank Loan Loss Provisioning Process. Forthcoming in:
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_75354.pdf Download (290kB) |
Abstract
This paper analyses the effects associated with using the magnitude of realised loan losses as a basis for performance measurement and compensation to credit risk team in banks. Paying and rewarding credit risk professionals on the basis of reporting fewer provisions or lower loan losses motivate credit risk teams to game the system that work to determine loan loss provisions estimate of banks. While bank credit risk teams are sometimes mesmerised by the short-term benefits of provisions games, they do not care if their behaviour destroys bank value and the informativeness of loan loss provisioning estimates. While it is not difficult for bank managers and analysts to understand that the provisioning process is subject to gaming, few of them understand the costs it pose on banks and how to lower this costs. This paper explains how this happens and how provisions games can be stopped or reduced. Using the magnitude of loan losses as a basis to determine the compensation to risk professionals or credit risk teams encourages provisions games. The solution is not to reduce or eliminate provisioning discretion of credit risk teams but rather to de-link credit risk teams’ bonuses from the magnitude of loan loss.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Paying Bank Risk Professionals to Lie About Bank Loan Loss Provisioning Process |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Provisions Games; Loan Loss Provisions; Bank Professionals, Credit Risk; Banks. |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing |
Item ID: | 75637 |
Depositing User: | Dr Peterson K Ozili |
Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2016 15:18 |
Last Modified: | 06 Oct 2019 14:23 |
References: | Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C. and Thomas, S. (1999) Bank Loan Loss Provisions: A Reexamination of Capital Management, Earnings Management and Signaling Effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1): 1-25. Angklomkliew, S., George, J. and Packer, F. (2009) Issues and Developments in Loan Loss Provisioning: the Case of Asia. BIS Quarterly Review December. Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2011) Do Delays in Expected Loss Recognition affect Banks' Willingness to Lend?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1): 1-20. Bloomberg (2016, April 25) China May Loosen Bad-Loan Provision Rules . http://www. bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-25/china-mulls-lower-bad-loan-coverage-ratio-bank-chairman-says Bushman, R. M. and Williams, C. D. (2015) Delayed Expected Loss Recognition and the Risk Profile of Banks. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3): 511-553. El Sood, H. A. (2012) Loan Loss Provisioning and Income Smoothing in US banks Pre and Post the Financial Crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25: 64-72. Gaston, E. and Song, M. I. (2014) Supervisory Roles in Loan Loss Provisioning in Countries Implementing IFRS. International Monetary Fund. No 14-170 Jensen, M. C. (2003) Paying people to lie: The truth about the budgeting process. European Financial Management, 9(3), 379-406. Laeven, L. and Majnoni, G. (2003) Loan Loss Provisioning and Economic Slowdowns: Too Much, Too Late?. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12(2): 178-197. Latham, G.P. and Mann, S. (2006) Advances in the Science of Performance Appraisal: Implications for practice. In: Hodgkinson, G.P. and Ford, J.K. (eds.), International Review of Organizational and Industrial Psychology, Vol. 21. San Francisco: John Wiley, 295-337. Lobo, G. J. and Yang, D. H. (2001) Bank Managers' Heterogeneous Decisions on Discretionary Loan Loss Provisions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 16(3): 223-250. Locke, E. A. (1978) The Ubiquity of the Technique of Goal Setting in Theories of and Approaches to Employee Motivation. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 594-601. Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. (1990) A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Locke, E. A. (2001) Motivation by goal setting. In R. T. Golembiewski (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior New York: Marcel Dekker. Ozili, P. K. (2015). Loan Loss Provisioning, Income Smoothing, Signaling, Capital Management and Procyclicality: Does IFRS Matter? Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 224-232. Ozili P. K. (2017). Bank Earnings Smoothing, Audit Quality and Procyclicality in Africa. The Case of Loan Loss Provisions. Review of Accounting and Finance, Forthcoming. Pérez, D., Salas-Fumás, V. and Saurina, J. (2008) Earnings and Capital Management in Alternative Loan Loss Provision Regulatory Regimes. European Accounting Review, 17 (3): 423-445. Reuter (2016, May 26) Greece's National Bank turns profitable as bad debt charges decline. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/greeces-national-bank-posts-first-145225945.html Saurina, J. (2009) Loan Loss Provisions in Spain. A Working Macro-prudential Tool. Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, 17: 11-26. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75637 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Paying Bank Risk Professionals to Lie About Bank Loan Loss Provisioning Process. (deposited 03 Dec 2016 07:17)
- Paying Bank Risk Professionals to Lie About Bank Loan Loss Provisioning Process. (deposited 19 Dec 2016 15:18) [Currently Displayed]