Catch-Up: A Rule That Makes Service Sports More Competitive

Brams, Steven J. and Ismail, Mehmet S. and Kilgour, D. Marc and Stromquist, Walter (2016): Catch-Up: A Rule That Makes Service Sports More Competitive.

Abstract

Service sports include two-player contests such as volleyball, badminton, and squash. We analyze four rules, including the Standard Rule (SR), in which a player continues to serve until he or she loses. The Catch-Up Rule (CR) gives the serve to the player who has lost the previous point—as opposed to the player who won the previous point, as under SR. We also consider two Trailing Rules that make the server the player who trails in total score. Surprisingly, compared with SR, only CR gives the players the same probability of winning a game while increasing its expected length, thereby making it more competitive and exciting to watch. Unlike one of the Trailing Rules, CR is strategy-proof. By contrast, the rules of tennis fix who serves and when; its tiebreaker, however, keeps play competitive by being fair—not favoring either the player who serves first or who serves second.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sports rules; service sports; Markov processes; competitiveness; fairness; strategy-proofness
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism

References

Anbarci, Nejat, Ching-Jen Sun, and M. Utku Ünver (2015). “Designing Fair Tiebreak Mechanisms: The Case of FIFA Penalty Shootouts.” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2558979

Anderson, C. L. (1977). “Note on the Advantage of First Serve.” Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 23, no. 3: 363.

Barrow, John D. (2012). Mathletics: 100 Amazing Things You Didn’t Know about the World of Sports. W. W. Norton.

Brams, Steven J., and Alan D. Taylor (1999). The Win-Win Solution: Guaranteeing Fair Shares to Everybody. New York: W. W. Norton.

Brams, Steven J., and Mehmet S. Ismail (2018). “Making the Rules of Sports Fairer.” SIAM Review. 60(1): 181{202.

D. Cohen-Zada, A. Krumer, O. M. Shapir (2018). "Testing the effect of serve order in tennis tiebreak." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 146: 106-115.

Isaksen, Aaron, Mehmet Ismail, Steven J. Brams, and Andy Nealen (2015). “Catch-Up: A Game in Which the Lead Alternates.” Game & Puzzle Design 1, no. 2: 38–49.

Kemeny, John G., and J. Laurie Snell (1960; reprinted 1976). Finite Markov Chains. New York: Springer.

Kingston, J. G. (1976). “Comparison of Scoring Systems in Two-sided Competitions.” Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 20, no. 3: 357–362.

Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio (2014). Beautiful Game Theory: How Soccer Can Help Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pauly, Marc (2014). “Can Strategizing in Round-Robin Subtournaments Be Avoided?” Social Choice and Welfare 43, no. 1 (June): 29–46.

Ruffle, Bradley J., and Oscar Volij (2015). “First-Mover Advantage in Best-of-Series: An Experimental Comparison of Role-Assignment Rules.”  International Journal of Game Theory, 1–38.

Schilling, Mark F. (2009). “Does Momentum Exist in Competitive Volleyball?” Chance 22, no. 4: 29–35.

von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Decisions, 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.