Thapa, Sridhar (2007): The relationship between farm size and productivity: empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills.
Download (184kB) | Preview
This paper examines the farm size and productivity relationship using data from Nepalese mid hills. The household data used has been drawn from a survey conducted by the author and financed by the Norwegian University of Life Science. The analysis uses models both allowing for and not allowing for village dummies(as cluster controls), the ratio of irrigated land (as proxy for land quality), and other socio-economic variables such as households, belonging to caste groups, and family size (as proxy for access to resources). The result supported the almost ‘stylized fact’ of inverse relationship (IR) between farm size and output per hectare. Total cash input use and labour hours per hectare were found to be higher on small farms. The findings of regression equations allowing for village dummies and other socio-economic variables do not support the explanation that the IR between farm size and productivity is due to variation in regions as well as access to resources. Nevertheless, family size and caste dummies show some effects on farm value added. The paper further investigates returns to scale in Nepalese agriculture, applying the Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function. The result shows constant returns to scale. Labour input seems more influential in farm production, followed by manure, in the sample farms. The overall result shows that the IR between farm size and output per hectare is perhaps due to the result more of other inputs used by small farms rather than diseconomies of scale.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The relationship between farm size and productivity: empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills|
|Keywords:||inverse relationship; farm size; productivity; returns to scale; Nepal|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products
|Depositing User:||Sridhar Thapa|
|Date Deposited:||12. Mar 2008 00:16|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2014 16:46|
Abdulai, A. and P.P. Regmi (2000). “Estimating labour supply of farm households under nonseparability: empirical evidence from Nepal”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 22: 309-320. Bardhan P.B.(1973), “Size, Productivity, and Returns to Scale: An Analysis of Farm-Level Data in Indian Agriculture”, Journal of Political Economy, 81:1370-1386. Barrett, C.B.(1996), “On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship”, Journal of Development Economics 51: 193-215. Berry, R.A. and W.R. Cline(1979), “Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries”, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. Bhalla, S.S. and P. Roy(1988), “Mis-Specification in Farm Productivity Analysis: the Role of Land Quality”, Oxford Economic Papers 40: 55-73. Bhandari, R.(2006), “ Searching for a Weapon of Mass Production in Nepal: Can Market-Assisted Land Reforms Live Up to their Promise?”, Journal of Developing Societies 22: 111-143. Carter, M.R.(1984), “Identification of inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical evidence of peasant agricultural production”, Oxford Economic Papers 36(1): 131-145. CBS(2002), “National Sample Census of Agriculture Nepal 2001/02”, Central Bureau of Statistics, Nepal Government, 2002, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cornia, G.A.(1985), “Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries”, World Development 13: 513-534. Deolalikar, A.B. (1981), “The inverse relationship between productivity and farm size: a test using regional data from India”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63:275-279 Fan S. and C. Chan-Kang (2005), “Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture”, Agricultural Economics, 32, (s1): 135-146. Feder, G.(1985), “The Farm Size and Farm Productivity: the Role of Family Labour, Supervision and Credit Constraints”, Journal of Development Economics 18: 297-313. Heltberg R.(1998), “Rural Market Imperfections and the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Pakistan”, World Development Vol.26, No.10: 1807-1826. Newell et al(1997), “Farm Size and the Intensity of Land Use in Gujarat”, Oxford Economic Papers 49: 307-315. Sen, A. K.(1962), “An Aspect of Indian Agriculture”, Economic Weekly, Annual Number. Sen, A. K.(1966), “Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labour”, Journal of Political Economy 7: 425-50. Thapa, Sridhar(2003). “Estimation of the Agricultural Household Labour Supply: A Case from Mardi Watershed Area, Kaski, Nepal”. Dissertation submitted to partial fulfilment of Masters of Science in Development and Resource Economics, Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Science, Norway.