On consumption patterns in oyster markets: the role of attitudes

Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano and Carlucci, Domenico and De Devitiis, Biagia and Nardone, Gianluca and Viscecchia, Rosaria (2017): On consumption patterns in oyster markets: the role of attitudes. Forthcoming in: Marine Policy

Abstract

Achieving a low-carbon and sustainable economy is a long-term goal that EU aims at achieving in the next few decades: the potential role of bioeconomy is likely to make the difference, and in particular, the EU aquaculture and the seafood processing industry has the potential to contribute substantially to the emergence of bioeconomies (for instance through new – niche - markets for bio-based products such as algae, etc). In this particular framework, understanding how to enhance cleaner and more sustainable consumption patterns is preliminary to the transition towards more equitable and sustainable markets. The present analysis investigates the role of consumers’ attitudes with respect to sustainable attributes (namely food safety and respect of the environment) in order to suggest on their potential role to catalyze the transition toward bioeconomies. Up to date, empirical investigations on this issue are limited to few markets, and studies on aquaculture are particularly scant. The gap is reduced by the present analysis: it has been implemented a survey on fish consumers to investigate how their attitudes toward food safety and environmental issues tend to influence consumption choices, and it is shown that those attitudes are important determinants of consumers choices. Put differently, a cleaner and more sustainable supply chain (i.e through a safer, and environmental friendly product) is likely to enhance consumption of oysters. To the extent that policy makers, producers, and taxpayers are interested in enhancing sustainable bioeconomies, understanding the relevance of attitudes toward food safety and environmental sustainability is an important and pressing goal. The analysis, novel in its application to a high quality product, speaks in this direction and will help understanding how to accelerate the transition to sustainable bioeconomies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Attitudes, Consumption, Food safety, Environment, Seafood, Sustainability
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q11 - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis ; Prices; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q22 - Fishery ; Aquaculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy

References

1. Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., and A. Spiller. 2009. “The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing .“ Food Control. 20(10): 927-935.

2. Asche, F., Larsen, T.A., Smith, M.D., Sogn-Grundvåg, G., & Young, J.A. (2015). Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy, 53, 82-93.

3. Baselice, A., Colantuoni, F., Lass, D. A., Nardone, G., & Stasi, A. (2017). Trends in EU Consumers’ Attitude Towards Fresh-cut Fruit and Vegetables. Food Quality and Preference. (in press)

4. Bi, X., House, L., and Z. Gao. 2016. “Impacts of Nutrition Information on Choices of Fresh Seafood Among Parents. “ Marine Resource Economics, 31(3).

5. Brécard, D., Hlaimi, B., Lucas, S., Perraudeau, Y., and F. Salladarré. 2009. “Determinants of demand for green products: an application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe.“ Ecological Economics. 69(1): 115-125.

6. Bronnmann, J., Loy, J. P., and K.J. Schroeder. 2016. “Characteristics of Demand Structure and Preferences for Wild and Farmed Seafood in Germany: An Application of QUAIDS Modeling with Correction for Sample Selection. “ Marine Resource Economics, 31(3).

7. Bruner, D.M., Huth, L.W., McEvoy, D.M., and O.A. Morgan, 2014. “Consumer Valuation of Food Safety: The Case of Postharvest Processed Oysters.“ Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 43(2): 300–318.

8. Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite, 84, 212-227.

9. Carlucci D., De De Vitiis B., Nardone G., Santeramo, F.G. (2017) Certification Labels vs Convenience Formats: What drives the market in aquaculture products? Marine Resource Economics. (In press)

10. Duggan, D. E., and Kochen, M. 2016. Small in scale but big in potential: Opportunities and challenges for fisheries certification of Indonesian small-scale tuna fisheries. Marine Policy, 67, 30-39.

11. European Commission, 2014. “Facts and figures on the Common Fisheries Policy – 2014 Edition.“ Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

12. Fabinyi, M. 2016. Sustainable seafood consumption in China. Marine Policy, 74, 85-87.

13. FAO, 2014. “The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges.“ Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

14. Fernqvist, F., and L. Ekelund. 2014. “Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food–A review.“ Food Quality and Preference, 32: 340-353.

15. Fonner, R., and Sylvia, G. 2015. “Willingness to pay for multiple seafood labels in a niche market.“ Marine Resource Economics, 30(1): 51-70.

16. Garza-Gil, M. D., Vázquez-Rodríguez, M. X., and Varela-Lafuente, M. M. 2016. Marine aquaculture and environment quality as perceived by Spanish consumers. The case of shellfish demand. Marine Policy, 74, 1-5.

17. Gracia, A., Loureiro, M. L., and R. M. Nayga. 2009. “Consumers’ valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study.“ Food Quality and Preference. 20(7): 463-471.

18. Grunert, K. G. 2005. “Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand.“ European Review of Agricultural Economics. 32(3): 369-391.

19. Hall, T. E., and S. M. Amberg. 2013. “Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the pacific northwest. “ Appetite. 66: 1-9.

20. Hynes, S., Norton, D., & Corless, R. (2014). Investigating societal attitudes towards the marine environment of Ireland. Marine Policy, 47, 57-65.

21. Jaffry, S., Glenn, H., Ghulam, Y., Willis, T., and Delanbanque, C. 2016. Are expectations being met? Consumer preferences and rewards for sustainably certified fisheries. Marine Policy, 73, 77-91.

22. Köster, E. P. 2009. “Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective.“ Food quality and preference. 20(2): 70-82.

23. Lancaster, K.J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 132-157.

24. Massoud, M. A., Fayad, R., El-Fadel, M., and R. Kamleh. 2010. “Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: A case of Lebanon.“ Journal of Cleaner Production. 18(3): 200-209.

25. McClenachan, L., Dissanayake, S., and X. Chen. 2016. “Fair trade fish: consumer support for broader seafood sustainability.“ Fish and Fisheries.

26. Olson, J., Clay, P. M., and da Silva, P. P. 2014. Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems. Marine Policy, 43, 104-111.

27. Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., Scholderer, J., Brunsø, K., and S. O. Olsen. 2007. “European consumers’ use of and trust in information sources about fish. “ Food Quality and Preference. 18(8): 1050-1063

28. Rickertsen, K., Alfnes, F., Combris, P., Enderli, G., Issanchou, S., and J.F. Shogren. 2017. “French Consumers’ Attitudes and Preferences toward Wild and Farmed Fish.“ Marine Resource Economics, 32(1): 59-81

29. Santeramo, F. G. (2015). Price transmission in the European tomatoes and cauliflowers sectors. Agribusiness, 31(3), 399-413.

30. Santeramo, F.G., Goodwin, B. K., Adinolfi, F., & Capitanio, F. (2016) Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Program. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 67(3), 639–657

31. Schmidt, O., Padel, S., and L. Levidow. 2012. “The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. “ Bio-based and Applied Economics. 1(1): 47-63.

32. Sjöberg, E. 2015. “Pricing on the Fish Market—Does Size Matter?.“ Marine Resource Economics, 30(3): 277-296.

33. Swartz, W., Schiller, L., Sumaila, U. R., and Ota, Y. 2017. Searching for market-based sustainability pathways: Challenges and opportunities for seafood certification programs in Japan. Marine Policy, 76, 185-191.

34. Tran, N., Bailey, C., Wilson, N., & Phillips, M. (2013). Governance of global value chains in response to food safety and certification standards: The case of shrimp from Vietnam. World development, 45, 325-336.

35. Wang, H. H., Zhang, X., Ortega, D. L., and N. J. O. Widmar. 2013. “Information on food safety, consumer preference and behavior: The case of seafood in the US.“ Food control. 33(1): 293-300.

36. Wessells, C. R., and J. G. Anderson. 1995. “Consumer willingness to pay for seafood safety assurances.“ Journal of Consumer Affairs. 29(1): 85-107.

37. Zhu, Q., Li, Y., Geng, Y., and Y. Qi. 2013. “Green food consumption intention, behaviors and influencing factors among Chinese consumers.“ Food Quality and Preference. 28(1): 279-286.