Broekel, Tom and Boschma, Ron (2017): The cognitive and geographical structure of knowledge links and how they influence firms’ innovation performance. Published in: Regional Statistics , Vol. 6, No. 2 (February 2017): pp. 3-26.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76805.pdf Download (218kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Firms’ embeddedness in knowledge networks has received much attention in literature. However, little is known about the structure of firms’ knowledge exchange with respect to different types of proximities. Based on survey data of 295 firms in 8 European regions, we show that firms’ knowledge exchange systematically differs in their geographical and cognitive dimensions. We find that firms’ innovation performance is enhanced if the firm primarily links to technologically related as well as technologically similar organizations. Connecting with organizations at different geographical levels yields positive effects as well.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The cognitive and geographical structure of knowledge links and how they influence firms’ innovation performance |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | geographical proximity knowledge networks technological relatedness innovation performance |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 76805 |
Depositing User: | Géza Tóth |
Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2017 11:57 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:11 |
References: | ARNDT, O.–STERNBERG, R. (2000): Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical based answer European Planning Studies 8 (4): 465–485. AZZALINI, A.–TORELLI, N. (2007): Clustering via nonparametric density estimation Statistics and Computing 17 (1): 71–80. BALLAND, P.-A. (2011): Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from Research and Development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry Regional Studies 46 (6): 741–756. BALLAND, P.-A.–SUIRE, R.–VICENTE, J. (2013): Structural and geographical patterns of knowledge networks in emerging technological standards: Evidence from the European GNSS industry Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22 (1): 47–72. BATHELT, H.–MALMBERG, A.–MASKELL, P. (2004): Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56. BIN, R. D.–RISSO, D. (2011): A novel approach to the clustering of microarray data via nonparametric density estimation BMC Bioinformatics 12:49. BOSCHMA, R. A. (2005): Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. BOSCHMA, R.–FRENKEN, K. (2010): The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective In: BOSCHMA, R.–MARTIN, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography pp. 120–135., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. BRESCHI, S.–LISSONI, F. (2003): Mobility and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited CESPRI Working Paper, No. 142., Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”, Milano. BROEKEL, T.–BOSCHMA, R. (2012): Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox Journal of Economic Geography 12 (2): 409–433. CANTNER, U.–GRAF, H. (2004): The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis Research Policy 35 (4): 463–480. CASSIMAN, B.–COLOMBO, M. G.–GARRONE, P.–VEUGELERS, R. (2005): The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness Research Policy 34 (2): 195–220. CRIBARI-NETO, F.–ZEILEIS, A. (2010): Beta regression in R Journal of Statistical Software 34 (2): 1–24. FERRARI, S. L. P.–CRIBARI-NETO, F. (2004): Beta Regression for modeling rates and proportions Journal of Applied Statistics 31 (7): 799–815. FORNAHL, D.–BROEKEL, T.–BOSCHMA, R. A. (2011): What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location Papers in Regional Science 90 (2): 395–418. FRENKEL, A.–SCHEFER, D. (1998): Local milieu and innovations: Some empirical results The Annals of Regional Science 32 (1): 185–200. GLUCKLER, J. (2007): Economic geography and the evolution of networks Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 619–634. GRAF, H. (2011): Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovation Cambridge Journal of Economics 35 (1): 173–198. KAUFMAN, L.–ROUSSEEUW, P. J. (1990): Finding groups in data John Wiley and Sons Ltd. West Sussex, England. LAZERSON, M. H.–LORENZONI, G. (1999): The firm that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source Industrial and Corporate Change 8 (2): 235–266. Martin, R.–Moodysson, J. (2011): Innovation in Symbolic Industries: The Geography and Organization of Knowledge Sourcing European Planning Studies 19 (7): 1183–1203 MEYER-KRAHMER, F. (1985): Innovation behaviour and regional indigenous potential Regional Studies 19 (6): 523–534. NOOTEBOOM, B. (2000): Learning and innovation in organizations and economics Oxford University Press, Oxford. NOOTEBOOM, B.–VAN HAVERBEKE, W.–DUYSTERS, G.–GILSING, V.–VAN DEN OORD, A. (2007): Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity Research Policy 36 (7): 1016–1034. PHELPS, C. C. (2010): A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition of firm exploratory innovation Academy of Management Journal 53 (4): 890–913. PONDS, R.–VAN OORT, F.–FRENKEN, K. (2007): The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration Papers in Regional Science 86 (3): 423–443. POWELL, W. W.–WALTER, W.–KOPUT, K. W.–SMITH-DOERR, L. (1996): Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in Biotechnology Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1): 116–145. SINGH, J. (2005): Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns Management Science 51 (5): 756–770. SMITHSON, M.–VERKUILEN, J. (2006): A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-Likelihood Regression with Beta-Distributed Dependent Variables Psychological Methods 11 (1): 54–71. STERNBERG, R.–ARNDT, O. (2001): The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behavior of European firms? Economic Geography 77 (4): 364–382. TER WAL, A.–BOSCHMA, R. (2009): Applying social network analysis in Economic Geography: Framing some key analytical issues Annals of Regional Science 43 (3): 739–756. TORRE, A.–RALLET, A. (2005): Proximity and localization Regional Studies 39 (1): 47–59. UZZI, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect American Sociological Review 61 (4): 674–698. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76805 |