What May Constitute an Equal Society? Addressing Externalities of Globalization:

Mamoon, Dawood (2001): What May Constitute an Equal Society? Addressing Externalities of Globalization:.

Abstract

This paper is a short review of Mamoon (2007) analysis on inequality where it is contrasted with growth. The economic processes or institutional dynamics that are good for growth may not be a priority if inequalities are the prime consideration. For example rule of law and control for corruption are the most salient factors to mitigate inequality but though they are also good for growth, it is good regulation that takes the lead in growth promotion. China has been benefitting from good market regulation - a pro capitalist economic tool kit while suffering from rising inequality that may be due to less emphasis on control for corruption.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Inequality, growth, globalization, Institutions
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy

References

Chen, Shaohua and Ravallion, Martin, “Household Welfare Impacts of China’s Accession to the World Trade Organization,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3040, 2003 www.econ.worldbank.org/files/26013_wps3040.pdf

Chong, Alberto and Mark Gradstein, “Inequality and Institutions,” Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper No. 506, April 2004.

Cockburn, John, “Trade Liberalization and Poverty in Nepal: A Computable General Equilibrium Micro Simulation Analysis,” The Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series. Working Paper 170, 2002 http://www.bepress.com/csae/paper170

Cornai, Giovanni, Andrea, Tony Addison and Sampsa Kiiski, “Income Distribution Changes and Their Impact in the Post-Second World War Period,” in Cornia Andrea Giovanni (eds) “Inequality, Growth, and Poverty in an Era of Liberalisation and Globalization”, Oxford Press for UNU_WIDER and UNDP, 2004

Dollar, David and Aart Kraay, “Institutions, Trade and Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (1), 2003, pp. 133-162.

Engerman, S. L. and K. L. Sokoloff, “Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Economies,” NBER Working Paper No. 9259, 2002.

Friedman, Jed, “Differential Impacts of Trade Liberalisation on Indonesia’s Poor and Non-Poor,” Conference on International Trade and poverty, Stockholm, October 20, 2000

Glaeser, Edward, L., Raphael La Porta,, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer, “Do Institutions cause Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2004, pp. 271-303

Gupta, Sanjeev, Hamid Davoodi and Rosa Alonso-Terme, “Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?” IMF Working Paper, WP/98/76, May 1998

Hellman, J., and Daniel Kaufmann, “The Inequality of Influence,” Washington DC, US, World Bank, 2002

Kaufman, Daniel, Aaart Kraay and Zoido-Lobaton, “Governance Matters II: Updated Indicators for 2000/01,” Policy Research Working Paper 2772, The World Bank, 2002 http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/govmatters2.pdf

Keefer, P., “Polarisation, Politics, and Property Rights: Links between Inequality and Growth,” Public Choice, Vol. 111, No. 1-2, 2002, pp. 127-54

Lofgren, Hans, “Trade Reform and the poor in morocco: A Rural-Urban General Equilibrium Analysis of Reduced Protection,” TMD Discussion paper, IFPRI, Washington DC, No. 38, 1999

Mamoon, Dawood and S. Mansoob Murshed, “Are Institutions more important than Integration?” Institute of Social Studies, Working Paper Series No. 416, November 2005

Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian and Francesco Trebbi , “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, pp. 131-165

Yudaeva, Ksenia, “Globalisation and Inequality in CIS Countries: Role of Institutions,” GDN Conference Paper, January 2003