Honma, Satoshi and Yoshida, Yushi (2017): Convergence in pollution terms of trade.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_78810.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
By implementing the world input-output tables for 40-countries by 35-industries to account for intermediate trade, we constructed the pollution terms of trade (PTT) on the basis of CO2 emissions between 1995 and 2009. We examine whether the PTTs have converged among the 40 countries in the past 15 years. The empirical evidence supports PTT convergence; PTT growth is negatively related to its initial level, and this empirical result is robust to various control variables.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Convergence in pollution terms of trade |
English Title: | Convergence in pollution terms of trade |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | World input-output table; International trade; Pollution haven hypothesis; Pollution terms of trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment |
Item ID: | 78810 |
Depositing User: | Satoshi Honma |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2017 13:40 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 01:53 |
References: | Ackerman, F., Ishikawa, M., and Suga, M., 2007. The carbon content of Japan–US trade. Energy Pol. 35(9), 4455–4462. Aldy, J. E., 2006. Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence? Environ. Resour. Econ. 33(4), 533–555. Antweiler, W., 1996, The Pollution Terms of Trade. Econ. Syst. Res. 8(4), 361–365. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 2001. Is free trade good for the Environment? Am. Econ. Rev. 91(4), 877–908. Bajona, C., Kehoe, T.J., 2010. Trade, growth, and convergence in a dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin model. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 13, 487–513. Baumol, W.J., 1986. Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show, American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072–1085. Barro, R.J., 1991. Economic growth in a cross section of countries, Q. J. Econ. 106(2), 407–443. Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X., 1992. Convergence. J. Polit. Econ. 100(2), 223–251. Ben-David, D., 1993. Equalizing exchange: Trade liberalization and income convergence. Q. J. Econ. 108(3), 653–679. Bernard, A.B., Durlauf, S.N., 1996. Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. J. Econometrics. 71, 161–173. Brock, W.A., Taylor, M.S., 2010. The green Solow model. J. Econ. Growth. 15, 127–153. Bulte, E., List, J.A., Strazicich, M.C., 2007. Regulatory federalism and the distribution of air pollutant emissions. J. Regional Sci. 47(1), 155-178. Carson, R.T., 2010. The environmental Kuznets curve: seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Rev. Env. Eco. Policy, 4(1), 3-23. Chatterjee, P., Shukayev, M., 2012. A stochastic dynamic model of trade and growth: convergence and diversification. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 36, 416–432 Chen, Z.Q., 1992. Long-run equilibria in a dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin model. Can. J. Econ. 25(4), 923–943. Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., 2003. Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 46, 363–383. Cuñat, A., Maffezzoli, M., 2004. Neoclassical growth and commodity trade. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 7, 707–736. Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol. Econ., 49(4), 431-455. Douglas, S., Nishioka, S., 2012. International differences in emissions intensity and emissions content of global trade. J. Dev. Econ. 99, 415–427. Druckman, A., Jackson, T., 2009. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: a socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model. Ecol. Econ. 68(7), 2066–2077. Eaton, J., Kortum, S., Neiman, B., Romalis, J., 2016. Trade and the Global Recession. Forthcoming in Am. Econ. Rev. Ederington, J., Levinson, A., Minier, J., 2004. Trade liberalization and pollution havens. Adv. Econ. Anal. Pol. 4(2), Article 6, 1–22. Frankel, J.A., Rose, A.K., 2005. Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality, Rev. Econ. Stat. 87(1), 85–91. Grether, J.M., Mathys, N.A., de Melo, J., 2009. Scale, technique and composition effects in manufacturing SO2 emissions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 43(2), 257–274. Grether, J.M., Mathys, N.A., 2013. The pollution terms of trade and its five components. J. Dev. Econ. 100(1), 19–31. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1993. Environment impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, in: Garber, P.M. (ed.), The Mexican-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. He, J., Fu, J., 2014. Carbon leakage in China's manufacturing trade: An empirical analysis based on the carbon embodied in trade. J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev. 23(3), 329–360. Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T.M., 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emisions and economic growth. J. Public Econ. 57, 85–101. Islam, N., 2003. What have we learnt from the convergence debate? J. Econ. Surv. 17(3), 309–362. Johnson, R.C., Noguera, G., 2012. Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. J. Int. Econ. 86, 224–236. Levinson, A., 2009. Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. Am. Econ. Rev. 99(5), 2127–2192. Levinson, A. and Taylor, M.S., 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int. Econ. Rev. 49(1), 223–254. Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tsurumi, T., 2009. Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 58, 346–363. McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K., 2008. The CO2 ‘trade balance’ between Scotland and the rest of the UK: performing a multi-region environmental input–output analysis with limited data. Ecol. Econ. 66(4), 662–673. Mountford, A., 1998. Trade, convergence, and overtaking. J. Int. Econ. 46, 167–182. Muradian, R., O’Connor, M., Martinez-Alier, J., 2002. Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the ‘environmental load displacement’ of industrialized countries. Ecol. Econ. 41, 51–67. Nakano, S., Okamura, A., Sakurai, N., Suzuki, M., Tojo, Y., Yamano, N., 2009. The measurement of CO2 embodiments in international trade: Evidence from the harmonised input-output and bilateral trade database (No. 2009/3). OECD Publishing. Ngyuen Van, P., 2005. Distribution dynamics of CO2 emissions, Environ. Resour. Econ. 32, 495–508. Ordás Criado, C., Grether, J.M., 2011. Convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: a robust distributional approach. Resour. Energy Econ. 33(3), 637–665. Ordás Criado, C., Valente, S., Stengos, T., 2011. Growth and pollution convergence: theory and practice. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 62, 199–214. Pan, J., Phillips, J., Ying, C., 2008. China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol. 24(2), 354–736. Peters, G.P., Hertwich, E.G., 2006. Pollution embodied in trade: The Norwegian case, Glob. Environ. Change. 16, 379–387. Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L., Edenhofer, O., 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 201006388. Serrano, M., Dietzenbacher, E., 2010. Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches. Ecol. Econ. 69(11), 2224–2232. Strazicich, M.C., List, J.A., 2003. Are CO2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Environ. Resour. Econ. 24, 263–271. Trefler, D., 1993. International factor price differences: Leontief was right! J. Polit. Econ. 101(6), 961–987. Trefler, D., Zhu, S.C., 2010. The structure of factor content predictions. J. Int. Econ. 82, 195–207. Ventura, J., 1997. Growth and interdependence. Q. J. Econ. 112(1), 57–84. Wiedmann, T., 2009. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting, Ecol. Econ. 69, 211–222. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., Barrett, J., 2007. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities—Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecol. Econ. 61(1), 15–26. Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H.C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S., Palm, V., 2011. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70(11), 1937–1945. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/78810 |