Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2016): Sovereign Debt Restructuring After Argentina. Forthcoming in: Development (2017)
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79130.pdf Download (147kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Sovereign debt restructurings may experience marginal changes as a result of recent modifications in contractual terms being incorporated into new bond issues, but for the most part they will likely resemble what has generally worked so well in recent decades to the satisfaction of most governments and private creditors. The statutory reforms that have been proposed to date are highly unlikely to gain traction for a variety of reasons, including the prospect that they would have been stymied when confronted with a rogue sovereign debtor such as Argentina.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sovereign Debt Restructuring After Argentina |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Argentina, default, debt, sovereign, restructuring, statutory; contractual; collective action; pari passu; finance |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F65 - Finance H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N26 - Latin America ; Caribbean |
Item ID: | 79130 |
Depositing User: | Arturo C. Porzecanski |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2017 04:33 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:04 |
References: | Alfaro, Laura (2015) ‘Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Evaluating the Impact of the Argentina Ruling’, Harvard Business Law Review 5(1): 47-71. Baker & McKenzie (2015), ‘Argentina Replaces DJAIs with Import Monitoring System’, Available at http://www.internationaltradecomplianceupdate.com/2015/12/22/argentina-replaces-djais-with-import-monitoring-system/ [accessed 23 August 2016]. Bradley, Michael, James D. Cox and Mitu Gulati (2010) ‘The Market Reaction to Legal Shocks and Their Antidotes: Lessons from the Sovereign Debt Market’, Journal of Legal Studies, 39(1): 289-324. Cancel, Daniel (2013) ‘Argentina Settles $677 Million Arbitration Cases with Bonds’, Bloomberg News, 18 October. Duggar, Elena (2013) ‘The Role of Holdout Creditors and CACs in Sovereign Debt Restructurings’, New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 10 April. Duggar, Elena (2014) ‘Impact of Court Ruling on Argentina’s Debt on Future Sovereign Debt Restructurings Is Likely Limited’, New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 3 March. Eichengreen, Barry and Richard Portes (eds.) (1995) Crisis? What Crisis? Orderly Workouts for Sovereign Debtors, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Enderlein, Henrik, Christoph Trebesch and Laura von Daniels (2012) ‘Sovereign Debt Disputes: A Database on Government Coerciveness during Debt Crises’, Journal of International Money and Finance 31(2): 250-266. Fisch, Jill E. and Caroline M. Gentile (2004) ‘Vultures or Vanguards: The Role of Litigation in Sovereign Debt Restructuring’, Emory Law Journal 53(Special Ed.): 1043-1113. Fritz, Thomas and Philipp Hersel (2002) Fair and Transparent Arbitration Process: A New Road to Resolve Debt Crises, Berlin: Discussion Paper FDCL-Verlag, August. Gelpern, Anna, Ben Heller and Brad Setser (2016) ‘Count the Limbs: Designing Robust Aggregation Clauses in Sovereign Bonds’, in Martin Guzman, José A. Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York: Columbia. Goldschmid, Paul M. (2005) ‘More Phoenix than Vulture: The Case for Distressed Investor Presence in the Bankruptcy Reorganization Process’, Columbia Business Law Review 2005(1): 191-274. Guzman, Martin and Joseph E. Stiglitz (2016a) ‘Creating a Framework for Sovereign Debt Restructuring that Works’, in Martin Guzman, José A. Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York: Columbia. Guzman, Martin and Joseph E. Stiglitz (2016b) ‘How Hedge Funds Held Argentina for Ransom’, New York Times, 1 April. Hofmann, Christian (2014) ‘Sovereign-Debt Restructuring in Europe Under the New Model Collective Action Clauses’, Texas International Law Journal 49(2): 383-441. International Capital Market Association (2014), ‘Standard Pari Passu Provision for the Terms and Conditions of Sovereign Notes’, Available at www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Resources/ICMA-Standard-Pari-Passu-Provision-August-2014.pdf, accessed 23 August 2016. IMF (2013) ‘Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Recent Developments and Implications for the Fund’s Legal and Policy Framework’, 26 April, International Monetary Fund. IMF (2014) ‘Strengthening the Contractual Framework to Address Collective Action Problems in Sovereign Debt Restructuring’, 2 September, International Monetary Fund. IMF (2015) Progress Report on Inclusion of Enhanced Contractual Provisions in International Sovereign Bond Contracts, 17 September, International Monetary Fund. Kaiser, Jürgen (2016) ‘Making a Legal Framework for Sovereign Debt Restructuring Operational’, in Martin Guzman, José A. Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York: Columbia. Mander, Benedict (2014) ‘Argentina Reaches Landmark Deal with Paris Club Creditors’, Financial Times, 29 May. Mander, Benedict (2016) ‘Argentina to Pay Italian ‘Holdout’ Creditors’, Financial Times, 2 February. Makoff, Gregory and Robert Kahn (2015) Sovereign Bond Contract Reform: Implementing the New ICMA Pari Passu and Collective Action Clauses, Waterloo: CIGI Paper No. 56, February. Ocampo, José A. (2014) ‘Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Argentina,’ Financial Times, 23 June. Ocampo, José A. (2016) ‘A Brief History of Sovereign Debt Resolution and a Proposal for a Multilateral Instrument’, in Martin Guzman, José A. Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York: Columbia. Platt, Eric and Elaine Moore (2016) ‘How Did Argentina Pull Off a $16.5bn Bond Sale?’ Financial Times, 20 April. Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2005) ‘From Rogue Creditors to Rogue Debtors: Implications of Argentina’s Default’, Chicago Journal of International Law 6(1): 311-332. Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2010) ‘When Bad Things Happen to Good Sovereign Debt Contracts: The Case of Ecuador’, Law & Contemporary Problems 73(4): 251-271. Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2015) The Origins of Argentina’s Litigation and Arbitration Saga, 2002-2014, Washington, DC: American University School of International Service Research Paper No. 2015–6. Raffer, Kunibert (1990) ‘Applying Chapter 9 Insolvency to International Debts: An Economically Efficient Solution with a Human Face’, World Development 18(2): 301-313. Taylor, John B. (2007) Global Financial Warriors: The Untold Story of International Finance in the Post-9/11 World, New York: W.W. Norton. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79130 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Sovereign Debt Restructuring After Argentina. (deposited 28 Aug 2016 20:59)
- Sovereign Debt Restructuring After Argentina. (deposited 15 May 2017 04:33) [Currently Displayed]