Tamayo, Adrian (2017): Assignment of powers and number of states in Federal Philippines Discussion paper on federalizing Philippines.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79545.pdf Download (546kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper argues that the number of states or regional units the Philippine should have when it will federalize the country must be limited to 5. This claim meets the Samuelsonian principle of welfare theorem where marginal social cost is equal to marginal social benefit.
The paper also argues that the states or regional governments should have the limited to earn revenue through taxing powers which will be used to spend for government operations. In this manner, efficiency is achieved and control of the federal government on the affairs of the states and regional governments is limited primarily to transfers through equalization parameters.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Assignment of powers and number of states in Federal Philippines Discussion paper on federalizing Philippines |
English Title: | Assignment of powers and number of states in Federal Philippines Discussion paper on federalizing Philippines |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal powers, Philippine federalism, welfare analysis |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions |
Item ID: | 79545 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Adrian Tamayo |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jun 2017 05:30 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:51 |
References: | Bardhan, P. (2006). Decentralization and development. Handbook of fiscal federalism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 201-223. Chipman, J. S., & Moore, J. C. (1980). Compensating variation, consumer's surplus, and welfare. The American Economic Review, 933-949. Hicks, J. R. (1943). The four consumer's surpluses. The review of economic studies, 11(1), 31-41. Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). Rethinking federalism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 43-64. MacDonald, R., & Hallwood, P. (2004). The economic case for fiscal federalism in Scotland. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Books. Prakash Chandra, J. (2012). Theory of Fiscal Federalism: An Analysis. Quigley, J. M. (1997). Fiscal federalism and economic development: A theoretical overview. In Government for the Future (pp. 83-101). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Ribstein, Larry E., and Bruce H. Kobayashi. "The economics of federalism." University of Illinois Legal Working Paper Series (2006) Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The review of economics and statistics, 387-389. Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. The review of economics and statistics, 350-356. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy, 64(5), 416-424. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79545 |