The Continuing Continuum Problem and Future Goods

Bagus, Philipp and Howden, David (2012): The Continuing Continuum Problem and Future Goods. Published in: The Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 3, No. 106 (2012): pp. 295-300.

Abstract

Barnett and Block (2011) argue that one cannot distinguish between deposits and loans due to the continuum problem of maturities and because future goods do not exist – both essential characteristics that distinguish deposit from loan contracts. In a similar way but leading to opposite conclusions, Bagus and Howden (forthcoming) maintains that both maturity mismatching and fractional reserve banking are ethically justified as deposit and loan contracts are equivalent. We argue herein that the economic and legal differences between genuine deposit and loan contracts are clear. This implies different legal obligations for deposit and loan contracts, a necessary step in assessing the ethics of both fractional reserve banking and maturity mismatching. While the former is economically, legally, and perhaps most importantly ethically problematic, there are no such troubles with the latter.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: banking, fraud, fractional reserves, maturity mismatching, natural law, difference loans and deposits, continuum problem, claims to future goods
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics

References

Bagus, P., and D. Howden: 2009, ‘The Legitimacy of Loan Maturity Mismatching: A Risky, but not Fraudulent, Undertaking’, Journal of Business Ethics 90(3), 399–406.

Bagus, P., and D. Howden: 2011, ‘The Economic and Legal Significance of “Full” Deposit Availability’, working paper.

Bagus, P., D. Howden and W. E. Block: forthcoming, ‘Deposits, Loans and Banking: Clarifying the Debate’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

Barnett, W., and W. Block: 2005: ‘Money: Capital Good, Consumers’ Good, or (Media of) Exchange Good?, The Review of Austrian Economics 18(2), 179-94.

Barnett, W., and W. Block: 2007: ‘Saving and Investment: A Praxeological Approach’, New Perspectives on Political Economy 3(2), 129-38.

Barnett, W., and W. Block: 2008: ‘Continuums’, Etica & Politica 10(1), 151-66.

Barnett, W., and W. Block: 2009: ‘Time Deposits, Dimensions and Fraud’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(4), 711-16.

Barnett, W., and W. Block: 2011, ‘Rejoinder to Bagus and Howden on Borrowing Short and Lending Long’, Journal of Business Ethics 100 (2), 229-38.

Hayek, F. A.: 1973: Law, Legislation and Liberty: Volume 1- Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hoppe, H.-H., J. G. Hülsmann, and W. Block: 1998, ‘Against Fiduciary Media, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 1(1), 19-50.

Huerta de Soto, J.: 2006, Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Leoni, B.: 1961, Freedom and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Company.

Mises, L. v.: 1952 [1951], ‘Profit and Loss’, in Planning for Freedom, 3rd edition. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press. pp. 108-50.

Peirce, C. S.: 1955 [1906] ‘The Concept of God’, in J. Buchler (ed.) Philosophical Writings of Peirce, New York: Dover Publications. pp. 375-79.

Rothbard, M. N.: 2001 [1962], Man, Economy, and State. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Rothbard, M. N.: 1998 [1982]. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press.

Selgin, G.: 2010. ‘Those Dishonest Goldsmiths’ (April 14, 2010). Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589709

White, L. H.: 2007, ‘Huerta de Soto's Case Against Fractional Reserves’, Free-Market News Network (08 Jan).

Yeager, L. B. (2010). Bank reserves: A dispute over words and classification. The Review of Austrian Economics, 23(2), 183-191.