Bulgaria in the EU Cohesion Process

Hadjinikolov, Dimitar (2017): Bulgaria in the EU Cohesion Process. Published in: Economic Alternatives No. 2 (26 June 2017): pp. 213-225.

Abstract

Cohesion is a precondition for implementing a number of important EU internal and external policies, such as functioning of the single market, the Eurozone, Common commercial policy,Environmental policy, etc. Therefore, achieving stronger cohesion is one of the main tasks of the European institutions. But in order to assess the development of the EU cohesion process and thereof the effectiveness of the ongoing cohesion policy, it is necessary to introduce and assess the results of certain cohesion indicators. The article includes nine such indicators: GDP per capita; Research and development expenditure as percentage of GDP; High-tech exports as percentage of total exports; People at risk of poverty or social exclusion; the Gini Coefficient; Life expectancy at birth; Density of motorway network; Share of trains in total inland passenger transport; Population connected to wastewater collection and treatment system. By using the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), the study establishes that in the decade of 2004-2014 there was enhanced cohesion in the EU in 8 out of the 9 indicators used. Based on comparison between Bulgaria’s individual results and those of the EU as a whole, it concludes that Bulgaria has not yet been able to get fully included in the cohesion process: 7 out of the total 9 cohesion indicators are lower than the average for the EU indicators.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: cohesion policy, cohesion indicators, European Union, Bulgaria
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

Bal-Domańska, B., Sobczak, E. (2016). On the Relationships between Smart Growth and Cohesion Indicators in the EU Countries. Statistics in Transition, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 249-264.

Baldwin, R., Wyplosz, Ch. (2009). The Economics of European Integration (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, L., pp. 381-416.

Chan. J., Chan. E., To, H.-P. (2006). Reconsidering Social Cohesion, Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 75, No.2 pp. 273-302.

Çolak, M. S., & Ege, A. (2013). An Assessment of EU 2020 Strategy: Too Far to Reach? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), pp. 659–680.

European Commission (2012). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. Official Journal if the European Union, 26.10.2012, C326/17.

European Commission (2010). Europa 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 2020 final.

OECD. (2011). Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World. OECD Publishing, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/persp_glob_dev-2012-en

Pasimeni, P. (2013). The Europe 2020 Index. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), pp. 613–635.

Pieńkowski, J., Berkowitz, P. (2015). Econometric Assessments of Cohesion Policy Growth Effects: How to make them more relevant for policy makers? Regional Working Paper 2015. European Commission, WP 02/2015, pp. 12-13.

Rappai, G. (2015). Europe En Route to 2020: A New Way of Evaluating the Overall Fulfillment of the Europe 2020 Strategic Goals. Social Indicators Research, 129(1), pp. 77-93.

Riga University. (2015). Abstract Book: Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy (2014-2020): An Academic and Policy Debate.

Stanley, D. (2003). What Do We Know about Social Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal Government’s Social Cohesion Research Network. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 1, Montréal, pp. 5-17.

Stratfor (2015). The Controversial EU Cohesion Policy Falls Short. https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/controversial-eu-cohesion-policy-falls-short

Tomova, M. et al. (2013). EU Governance and EU Funds – Testing the Effectiveness of EU Funds in a Sound Macroeconomic Framework, European Commission, DG ECFIN, European Economy, Economic Papers No 510, Brussels.