Tulung, Joy Elly and Ramdani, Dendi (2015): The Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on BPD Performance. Published in: International Research Journal of Business Studies , Vol. 8, No. 3 (2016): pp. 155-166.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79906.pdf Download (388kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Based on ”upper echelons theory”, this paper investigates the relation between top management team composition and BPD performance. For top management team characteristics, we employ age, level of education, background of education, gender, and functional background, while for measured the BPD performance we employ return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), capital adequacy ratio (CAR), net interest margin (NIM), loan to deposit ratio (LDR), non-performing loan (NPL) and operation expenses to operation income (BOPO). The results show that all characteristics have positive significant influences on BPD performance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on BPD Performance |
English Title: | The Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on BPD Performance |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Top Management Team, BPD Performance, Upper Echelons Theory |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance |
Item ID: | 79906 |
Depositing User: | Joy Elly Tulung |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jul 2021 07:30 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jul 2021 07:30 |
References: | Amason, A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision - making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148. Amason, A.C. & Sapienza, H.J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516. Bantel, K. A. & Jackson, S. E. (1989), Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?.Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107–124. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250100709 Bialas, M. & Solek, A. (2010) Evolution of Capital Adequacy Ratio, Economics & Sociology, Vol. 3, No 2. pp. 48-57. Boone, C. & Hendricks, W. (2009). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Moderators of functionalbackground and locus-of-control diversity. Management Science, 55 (2009), pp. 165–180 Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C.M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006) Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43 813 839. Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C. (1996) Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Glunk, U., Heijltjes, M., G., & Olie, R. (2001). Design characteristics and functioning of top management teams in Europe. European Management Journal, 19(3): 291–300 Habelian, J. & Finkelstein, S. (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating role of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36: 844-863. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. doi. org/10.2307/20159303 Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S. & Chen, M. (1996) The influence of top management Heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41: 659-684. Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9: 193-206. Hermalin, B. E. & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The Determinants of Board Composition. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589- 606. Hermann, P. & Datta, D. K. (2005) Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation’, British Journal of Management, Vol. 16 No. 1: 69-78. Jarzabkowski, P. & Searle, R. (2003)Top management team strategic capacity:diversity, collectivity & trust. Aston Business School Research Papers Kasmir. (2007). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya, Edisi Keenam, Penerbit Raja Grafindo Persada, PT, Jakarta Kusumastuti, S., Supatmi., & Astra, P. (2007) Pengaruh Board Diversity Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dalam Perspektif Corporate Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan, 9(2). 88-98 Mayr, R. (2011). Top Management Team Age Structure and Firm Performance, Ph.D Dissertation, University of St. Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) Maclean, M., C. Harvey & J. Press (2005) “Business Elites and Corporate Governance in France and the UK”, Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan. Michel, J. & D. Hambrick. (1992) Diversification posture and top management team characteristics, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 9-37. Pegels, C. C. & Yang, B., (2000). Top management team impact on strategies assets accumulation capabilities. Management Decision: Vol. 38: 694-710 Ponnu, C.H. (2008). Corporate Governance Structures and the Performance of Malaysian Public Listed Companies. International Review of Business Research Papers., 4 (2). pp. 217-230. Taylor, R. N. (1975). Age and Experience as determinants of Managerial Information Processing and Decision Making Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 18, pp.74-81 Tjager, I.N. (2003). Corporate Governance; Tantangan dan Kesempatan bagi Komunitas Bisnis Indonesia. PT Prenhallindo, Jakarta. Van Veen, K. & Elbertsen, J. (2008), Governance Regimes and Nationality Diversity in Corporate Boards: A Comparative Study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 386–399. Vroom, VH., & Pahl, B. (1971). Relationship Between Age and Risk Taking Among Managers.Journal of Applied Psychology, eric.ed.gov West, M.A. & Anderson, N.R. (1996), Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 81(6), Dec 1996, 680-693. West, C.T. Jr. & C.R. Schwenk. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), pp. 571-576. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79906 |