Gao, Lin (2017): What Affects General Trust? A Perspective from Institutional Economics and Empirical Evidence from China.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79948.pdf Download (926kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Given the importance of trust, exploring what may affect trust then becomes attractive. The main purpose of this paper is to explain general trust quantitatively. This paper from, but not limited to, a perspective of original institutional economics elaborates what may affect general trust and proposes three reasonable hypotheses first, and then uses CGSS 2013 dataset to execute ordered logit regression of general trust on some selected variables. It is found that taken advantage has a strongly significant negative impact on general trust; fairness, moral satisfaction, opinion similarity, leisure time for rest and leisure time for learning have strongly significant positive impacts on general trust; public security problem, however, has a negative but not significant impact on general trust. These core explanatory variables improve predictive capability by 4 percent. This paper also compares general trust and trust in strangers, and regress trust in strangers on the same independent variables of general trust. There are two main differences: the first is that the negative impact of public security problem gets significant for trust in strangers; the second is that the significant impact of leisure time for resting gets negative for trust in strangers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What Affects General Trust? A Perspective from Institutional Economics and Empirical Evidence from China |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | general trust, trust in strangers, original institutional economics, fairness, morality, opinion, public security, leisure time |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General |
Item ID: | 79948 |
Depositing User: | Lin Gao |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jun 2017 13:19 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 13:58 |
References: | Agresti, A., 2010. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. Wiley: Hoboken, New Jersey. 2nd Edition. Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E., 2000. Who Trusts Others? Journal of Public Economics, Vol.85, pp.207-234. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., 2010. Inherited Trust and Growth. American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 2060-2092. Bian, Y., Li, L., 2012. The Chinese General Social Survey (2003-8). Chinese Sociological Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 70-97. Blanco, L., Ruiz, I., 2013. The Impact of Crime and Insecurity on Trust in Democracy and Institutions. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 284-288. Bohnet, I., Huck, S., 2004. Repetition and Reputation: Implications for Trust and Trustworthiness When Institutions Change. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No.2, pp. 362-366. Daniele, G., Geys, B., 2015. Interpersonal trust and welfare state support. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.39, pp.1-12. Delhey, J., Newton, K., 2003. Who Trusts?: The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies. European Societies, Vol.5, No.2, pp.93-137. Dewey, J., 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Henry Holt & Co.: New York. Elsner, W., Schwardt, H., 2014. Trust and arena size: expectations, institutions, and general trust, and critical population and group sizes. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol.10, No.1, pp.107-134. Elsner, W., Schwardt, H., 2015. From emergent cooperation to contextual trust, and to general trust: overlapping meso-sized interaction arenas and cooperation platforms as a foundation of pro-social behavior. Forum for Social Economics 44(1): 69-86. Elsner, W., Heinrich, T., Schwardt, H., 2015. The microeconomics of complex economies: evolutionary, institutional, neoclassical, and complexity perspectives. Amsterdam, Elsevier. Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481-510. Heiss, F., 2016. Using R for Introductory Econometrics. CreateSpace. Companion website: http://www.URfIE.net. Hodgson, G.M., 2013. From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics without Homo Economicus. The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago. Kant, I., [1785] 2002, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood, Yale University Press: New Haven and London. Kant, I., [1788] 1968. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Kants Werke Adakemie Textausgabe V, Walter de Gruyter & Co.: Berlin. Kant, I., [1788] 2002. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.: Indianapolis / Cambridge. Kapp, K.W., 2011. The Foundations of Institutional Economics. Edited by Sebastian Berger and Rolf Steppacher. Routledge: London and New York. Knack, S., Keefer, P., 1997. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, No.4, pp. 1251-1288. Ku, H.-M., 1898. Discourses and Sayings of Confucius: A New Special Translation, Illustrated with Quotations from Goethe and Other Writers. Kelly and Walsh Limited: Shanghai. Liang, S.-M., [1949] 2005. The Essence of Chinese Culture. People’s Publisher of Shanghai, Shanghai. (In Chinese) National Survey Research Center, Chinese General Social Survey, 2013. CGSS 2013 Questionnaire A. Beijing (In Chinese) National Survey Research Center, Chinese General Social Survey, 2013. CGSS 2013 Questionnaire B. Beijing (In Chinese) Norman, G., 2010. Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 625-632. Paldam, M., 2009. The macro perspective on generalized trust. In: Svendsen, G.T. and Svendsen, G.L.H. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 354-375. Peiró-Palomino, J., Tortosa-Ausina, E., 2013. Can trust effects on development be generalized? A response by quantile. European Journal of Political Economy. Vol.32, pp. 377-390. R Core Team, 2016. foreign: Read Data Stored by Minitab, S, SAS, SPSS, Stata, Systat, Weka, dBase, …. R package version 0.8-67. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=foreign. R Core Team, 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Smith, A., [1759] 1966. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Augustus M. Kelley: New York. Veblen, T., [1899] 2005. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Aakar Books: Delhi. Yee, T.W., 2017. VGAM: Vector Generalized Linear and Additive Models. R package version 1.0-3. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VGAM. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79948 |