Rietz, Thomas and Schniter, Eric and Sheremeta, Roman and Shields, Timothy (2017): Trust, Reciprocity and Rules. Forthcoming in: Economic Inquiry
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80275.pdf Download (587kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many economic interactions rely on trust, which is sometimes violated. The fallout from business fraud and other malfeasance shows serious economic consequences of trust violations. Simple rules mandating minimum standards are attractive because they prevent the most egregious trust violations. However, such rules may undermine more trusting and reciprocal (trustworthy) behavior that otherwise would have occurred and, thus, lead to worse outcomes. We use an experimental trust game to test the efficacy of exogenously imposed minimum standard rules. Rules fail to increase trust and reciprocity, leading to lower economic welfare. Although sufficiently restrictive rules restore welfare, trust and reciprocity never return. The pattern of results is consistent with participants who are not only concerned with payoffs, but also use the game to learn about trust and trustworthiness of others.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trust, Reciprocity and Rules |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Trust, Reciprocity, Minimum Standards, Experiment |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation |
Item ID: | 80275 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2017 04:19 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 17:11 |
References: | Benabou, R. and J. Tirole. Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), (2006), 1652-1678. Berg, J. E., J. Dickhaut, and K. A. McCabe. Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, (1995), 122-142. Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston. Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity. American Economic Review, 88(4), (1998), 902-932. Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels. ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), (2000), 166-193. Bowles, S. and S. P. Reyes. Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), (2012), 368-425. Camerer, C. F. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2003. Clarke, E. Shared Space - The Alternative Approach to Calming Traffic. Traffic Engineering & Control, (2006), 290-292. Croson, R. T. A. and M. B. Marks. Step Returns in Threshold Public Goods: A Meta- and Experimental Analysis. Experimental Economics, 2(3), (2000), 239-259. Davis, J. Exchange. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1992. Dickinson, D. and M.-C. Villeval. Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort? The Complementarity between Agency and Crowding-out Theories. Games and Economic Behavior, 63(1), (2008), 56-76. Dufwenberg, M. and G. Kirchsteiger. A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), (2004), 268-298. Falk, A. and M. Kosfeld. The Hidden Costs of Control. American Economic Review, 96(5), (2006), 1611-1630. Fehr, E. and G. Kirchsteiger. Insider Power, Wage Discrimination and Fairness. Economic Journal, 104(424), (1994), 571-583. Fehr, E. and B. Rockenbach. Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism. Nature, 422, (2003), 137-140. Fehr, E. and K. Schmidt. A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), (1999), 817-868. Fischbacher, U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), (2007), 171-178. Glaeser, E., D. L. Laibson, J. Scheinkman, and C. Soutter. Measuring Trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), (2000), 811-846. Gneezy, U. and A. Rustichini. A Fine is a Price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), (2000), 1-17. Houser, D., E. Xiao, K. A. McCabe, and V. L. Smith. When Punishment Fails: Research on Sanctions, Intentions and Non-cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2), (2008), 509-532. Kahan, D. M. Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem. University of Chicago Law Review, 67(3), (2000), 607. Kimball, M. S. Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 53-73. Kurzban, R. and D. Houser. Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(5), (2005), 1803-1807. Levine, D. K. Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), (1998), 593-622. Menezes, C., C. Geiss, and J. Tressler. Increasing Downside Risk. American Economic Review, 70(5), (1980), 921-932. Munscher, R., M. Vetter, and T. Scheuerle. A Review and Taxonomy of Choice Architecture Techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, (2015), 511-524. Ostrom, E. and J. Walker. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons for Experimental Research. The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2003. Rabin, M. Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), (1993), 1281-1302. Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, D. S. Burt, and C. F. Camerer. Not so different after All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Managment Review, 23(3), (1998), 393-404. Schelling, T. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1960. Segal, U. and J. Sobel. Tit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings. Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1), (2007), 197-216. Sobel, J. Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(2), (2005), 392-436. Thaler, R. and C. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008. Titmuss, R. M., A. Oakley, and J. Ashton. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York, New York: The New Press, 1997. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80275 |