Mamoon, Dawood (2017): Missing the Peace Train in 2006: Economic and Political Dynamics of India Pakistan Hostility?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_81759.pdf Download (229kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper discusses the dynamics of peace initiatives made by Pakistan in 2006 and their importance in changing the regional dynamics in favour of increased economic cooperation in the light of the study undertaken by Murshed and Mamoon (2007) which has analysed the multiple determinants of conflict between India and Pakistan. The paper highlights the importance of peace in the region especially for Pakistan where the development potential of the country have been stifled greatly due to a long history of political and economic volatility while linking Pakistan’s progress with that of its neighbours through conflict mitigation process. The paper also presents the possibility of such dyadic economic and conflict trade off in 1990s where India may have utilised hostilities to curtail Pakistani economic potential to pressurise Pakistan to forego its support of insurgency in Indian held Kashmir. Pakistani peace initiatives in 2006 made the country as a leading factor in South Asia with a valid possibility of determining the pace and potential to realise long sought process of regional progress through greater integration of interests. However, the tangible response from Indian side was not forthcoming leading to loss of opportunities and thus creating a good explanation of Hawkish Indian behaviour 10 years down the time line in 2017.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Missing the Peace Train in 2006: Economic and Political Dynamics of India Pakistan Hostility? |
English Title: | Missing the Peace Train in 2006: Economic and Political Dynamics of India Pakistan Hostility? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | India, Pakistan, Conflict, Economy, Regionalism |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security ; Economic Nationalism F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development |
Item ID: | 81759 |
Depositing User: | Dawood Mamoon |
Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2017 14:48 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:17 |
References: | Angell-Lane, Ralph Norman (1910) The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage, London: Heinemann Hegre, Håvard (2002) ‘Trade decreases Conflict More in Multi-Actor Systems: A Comment on Dorussen’, Journal of Peace Research, 39(1): 109-114. Lipset, Seymour (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, New York: Doubleday Murshed, M. and Mamoon, D. (2007) ‘On the Costs of Not Loving Thy Neighbor as Thyself: the Trade and Military Expenditure Explanations behind India-Pakistan Rivalry’ Working Papers - General Series 446, Institute of Social Studies., The Netherlands, 2007 http://adlib.iss.nl/adlib/uploads/wp/wp446.pdf Polachek, Solomon W (1997) ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International trade and Cooperation’, Review of International Economics, 5(3): 295-309. Polachek, Solomon W and Carlos Seiglie (2006) ‘Trade, Peace and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute’, IZA DO No. 2170. World Development Indicators (2006), World Bank, Washington D.C |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/81759 |