Olawole, Kolawole and Adebayo, Temidayo (2017): Openness and Government Size:The Compensation and Efficiency Hypotheses Considered for Nigeria.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82022.pdf Download (582kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship among financial openness, trade openness and government size in Nigeria. The study employed the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration to investigate the relationship among the variables. Empirical estimates revealed that financial openness is significantly and negatively related to government size in line with the conventional wisdom that capital mobility may undermine the ability of governments to tax and raise revenue to finance government expenditure which is termed as the efficiency hypothesis. In addition, a positive relationship was reported between trade openness and government size which implies that there is evidence to support compensation hypothesis. The findings of the study suggest that openness has made the country highly vulnerable to external risk and there is need for the government to increase government expenditure and most especially, devote more funds to social welfare expenditure. This will help cushion the negative effects openness and its associated risks has on the country’s citizens.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Openness and Government Size:The Compensation and Efficiency Hypotheses Considered for Nigeria |
English Title: | Openness and Government Size: The Compensation and Efficiency Hypotheses Considered for Nigeria |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Openness; Government Size; External Risk |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General |
Item ID: | 82022 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Kolawole Opeyemi Olawole |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2017 10:27 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 04:19 |
References: | Agu, C. C. (1988). “Interest Rate Policy in Nigeria: An Attendant Distortion.” Savings and Investment Journal, 12 (1). Agu, C. C., Orji, A. and Eigbiremolen, G. (2014). “Financial Liberalization, Interest Rate Structure and Savings Mobilization: The Nigerian Experience” International Journal of Current Research 6 (1). Aregbeyen, O. and Ibrahim, T. M. (2014). “Trade Openness-Government Size Nexus: Compensation Hypothesis Considered for Nigeria.” Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Vol., 3, 364-372. Aydogus, I. and Topcu, M. (2013). “An Investigation of Co- Integration and Causality between Trade Openness and Government Size in Turkey”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3, 2, pp. 319-323. Benarroch, M. and Pandey, M. (2008). “Trade Openness and Government Size”, Economics Letters, Vol. 101, pp. 157-159. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2002). “Globalisation, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition:Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Economy, 18(4), 695–716. Cameron, D. (1978). “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 72, pp. 1243-1261. Central Bank of Nigeria (2015). “Statistical Bulletin.” Volume 26, December, 2015. Dickey, D. and Fuller, W.A. (1979). “Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 74: pp. 427–431. Dixit, V. (2014). “Relation between Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size in India: An Application of Bounds Testing-ARDL Approach to Co- integration.” Foreign Trade Review 49(1) 1–29. Garena, J. and Trask, K. (2005). “Do more open Economies have Bigger Governments? Another Look.”Journal of Development Economics, 77(2), 533–551. Iversen T. and Cusack T. (2000). “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?”, World Politics, 52, 313-349. Katumba, O. S. (2013). “Globalization and Government Size: Adopting the Mean Group Estimator Model.” An Unpublished M.Sc Thesis. Kimakova, A. (2009). “Government Size and Openness Revisited: The Case of Financial Globalization.” KYKLOS, Vol. 62 – August 2009 – No. 3, 394–406. Kocatepe, I. A. and Nevsehir, M.T. (2013). “An Investigation of Co-Integration and Causality between Trade Openness and Government Size in Turkey.” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 319-323. Lane, P. and Milesi-Ferretti G. (2017). “External Wealth of Nations Mark II Database: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2014.” Journal of International Economics, 73: 223–50. Lane, P. R. and Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2006). “A Global Perspective on External Positions,” NBER Working, No. 11589. Liberati, P. (2007). “Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size. “Journal of Public Policy, 27, pp. 215-247. Lin, F., Li, B. and Sim, N. (2014). “Trade Openness and Government Size of Small Developing Countries.” Economics of Transition, Vol, 22, Issue 4, pp.783-808. Gujarati, D. N and Porter, D.C. (2009). “Basic Econometrics”. McGraw Hill, New York, Fifth Edition. Molana H., Montagna C. and Violato M. (2004). “On the Causal Relationship between Trade Openness and Government Size: Evidence from 23 OECD Countries.” mimeo. Nwaka, I. D. and Onifade, S. T. (2010). “Government Size, Openness and Income Risk Nexus:New Evidence from Some African Countries.” African Governance Development Institute Working Paper, Volume VI, Issue 1, pg. 105 – 118. Orji, A. (2014). “Analysis of Financial Openness and Macroeconomic Performance in Nigeria”. A Ph.D Thesis. Pesaran, M. H and Pesaran, B. (1997), Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Pesaran, M. H and Shin, Y. (1995). “Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis”. DAE Working Paper Series No. 9514. Pesaran, M. H, Shin, Y. and Smith, R. J. (1996). “Testing the Existence of Long Run Relationship” DAE Working Paper Series, No. 9622. Pesaran, M. H, Shin, Y. and Smith, R.J. (2001). “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (3): 289- 326. Rodrik, D. (1998), “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997-1032. Sanz, I. and Velzquez, F. (2002). “Determinants of the Composition of Government Expenditure by Functions.” European Economy Group Working Paper No. 13. Schulze G. and Ursprung H. W. (1999). “Globalization of the Economy and the Nation State”, The World Economy, 22, 295-352. Shahbaz, M., Rehman, H. and Amir, M. (2010). “The Impact of Trade and Financial Openness on Government Size: A Case Study of Pakistan.” Journal of Quality and Technology. Swank, D. (2002). “Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Tash, M. S., Khoramabadi, T. and Laghab, S. B. (2017). “The Relationship between Government Size and Trade Openness in Iran.” International Business Management 11(2):375-380. Uchendu, O. A. (1993). “Interest Rate Policy in Savings and Investment in Nigeria” CBN Economic and Financial Review 31:13-25. Wagner, A. (1893). “Groundwork of Political Economy.” Grundlegung der Politschen Okonomie, Liepzig,Germany: C.F. Winter. World Bank (2012). “World Bank Development Indicators 2012.” World Bank (2015). “World Development Indicators 2016.” |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82022 |