Small Differences in Experience Bring Large Differences in Performance

Levine, Sheen S. and Reypens, Charlotte (2016): Small Differences in Experience Bring Large Differences in Performance. Published in: CEUR Workshop Proceeding , Vol. 1627, No. Experimental Economics and Machine Learning (25 July 2016): pp. 123-125.

Abstract

In many life situations, people choose sequentially between repeating a past action in expectation of a familiar outcome (exploitation), or choosing a novel action whose outcome is largely uncertain (exploration). For instance, in each quarter, a manager can budget advertising for an existing product, earning a predictable boost in sales. Or she can spend to develop a completely new product, whose prospects are more ambiguous. Such decisions are central to economics, psychology, business, and innovation; and they have been studied mostly by modelling in agent-based simulations or examining statistical relationships in archival or survey data. Using experiments across cultures, we add unique evidence about causality and variations. We find that exploration is boosted by three past experiences: When decision-makers fall below top performance; undergo performance stability; or suffer low overall performance. In contrast, individual-level variables, including risk and ambiguity preferences, are poor predictors of exploration. The results provide insights into how decisions are made, substantiating the micro-foundations of strategy and assisting in balancing exploration with exploitation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Exploration, Exploitation, Decision Making, Experiment, Protocol Analysis, Cross-culture
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility

References

Hills, T.T., Todd, P.M., Lazer, D., Redish, A.D., Couzin, I.D.: Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (1) (2015) 46-54

Mehlhorn, K., Newell, B.R., Todd, P.M., Lee, M.D., Morgan, K., Braithwaite, V.A., Hausmann, D., Fiedler, K., Gonzaleza, C.: Unpacking the exploration-exploitation tradeo : A synthesis of human and animal literatures. Decision (Washington) 2 (3) (2015) 191-215

Mason, W., Watts, D.J.: Collaborative learning in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (3) (2012) 764-769

Alchian, A.: Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58 (1950)

Gittins, J.C., Gittins, J.C.: Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (1979) 148-177

Kauffman, S., Levin, S.: Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 128 (1) (1987) 11-45

Nagel, R., Vriend, J.N.: An experimental study of adaptive behavior in an oligopolistic market game. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9 (1) (1999) 27-65

Winter, S.G.: Purpose and progress in the theory of strategy: Comments on gavetti. Organization Science 23 (1) (2012) 288-297

March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1) (1991) 71-87

Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Reviseded.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1993)

Horton, J.J., Rand, D.G., Zeckhauser, R.J.: The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14 (3) (2011) 399-425

Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making (2010) 411-419

Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466 (7302) (July 2010) 29