Beyond being Good Neighbors: Proximity to International Markets Matter More for India Pakistan Peace

Mamoon, Dawood (2017): Beyond being Good Neighbors: Proximity to International Markets Matter More for India Pakistan Peace.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether greater level of international integration, increased development spending and economic growth improve relations between India and Pakistan. The analysis controls for political orientation, defence spending and population for both countries. We investigate the causal links between different measures of bilateral conflict and these variables in a time series framework running between 1950-2005 in most instances. Our results suggest that more international trade, improved budget allocation for development sector and higher growth rates have been the primary determinants of conflict mitigation between India and Pakistan. The export capabilities of both countries are key for the peace process to move forward. We also find that India Pakistan conflict is the cause of high military expenditures and low/stagnant development expenditures in Pakistan over the Last 50 years. Another important finding of the study is that a weak relationship exists between conflict mitigation and relative political orientation of both countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Inter-state conflict and trade, democracy and conflict, conflict and economic development.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F68 - Policy

References

Azar, Edward E. (1980) ‘The Conflict and Peace Data bank (COPDAB) Project’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24 (1), 143-152

Chang, Yuan-Ching, Solomon W Polachek and John Robst (2004) ‘Conflict and Trade: The Relationship Between Geographic Distance and International Interactions’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 491-509.

Dorussen, Han (1999) ‘Balance of Power Revisited: A Multi-Country Model of Trade and Conflict’, Journal of Peace Research, 36(4), 443-462.

Edgeworth, Francis Y. (1881) Mathematical Psychics, London: C Kegan Paul

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T., and Stock, J. H. (1996) ‘Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root’, Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

Granger, Clive (1969) ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’, Econometrica, 37, 424-438.

Hegre, Håvard (2002) ‘Trade decreases Conflict More in Multi-Actor Systems: A Comment on Dorussen’, Journal of Peace Research, 39(1), 109-114.

Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A Bremer and David J Singer (1996) ‘ Militarised Inter-state Disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15 (2), 163-212.

Polachek, Solomon W (1997) ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International trade and Cooperation’, Review of International Economics, 5(3), 295-309.

Polachek, Solomon W and Carlos Seiglie (2006) ‘Trade, Peace and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute’, IZA DO No. 2170.

Richardson, Lewis Fry (1960), Arms and Insecurity, A Mathematical Study of the Causes and Origins of War, Pittsburgh: The Boxwood Press.

Robst, John, Solomon Polachek and Yuan-Ching Chang (2006) ‘Geographic Proximity, Trade and International Conflict/Cooperation’, IZA DP no. 1988.

Sims, Chris (1980) ‘Macroeconomics and Reality’, Econometrica, 48, 1-48.

Singer, David J. and Melvin Small (1972), The Wages of War, 1816-1965: A Statistical Handbook, New York: Wiley . Skaperdas, Stergios (1992) 'Cooperation, Conflict and Power in the Absence of Property Rights', American Economic Review, 82, 720-39.

Schwert, G William, 1989. ‘ Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change over Time?’, Journal of Finance, 44(5), 1115-53.

World Development Indicators (2006), World Bank, Washington D.C

Wright, Quincy (1942), A Study of War, Chicago: University Press.